Modernizing Clinical Research Systems: Reducing Validation Overhead in Pharma

The pharmaceutical industry is currently subsidizing a $3.6 trillion technical debt crisis, and nowhere is the tax higher than in clinical research systems. While other sectors pivot to agile microservices, life sciences remain shackled to monolithic Electronic Data Capture (EDC) and Clinical Trial Management Systems (CTMS) that were architected before the iPhone existed. The reason isn't a lack of ambition; it’s the "Validation Trap." In a regulated environment, the cost of proving a new system works often exceeds the cost of building it.

TL;DR: Modernizing clinical research systems fails because of manual documentation gaps and validation overhead; Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay reduces this burden by 70%, turning validated user workflows into documented, modern code in weeks rather than years.

The Validation Trap: Why Pharma Rewrites Fail#

In the world of 21 CFR Part 11 and GxP compliance, the code is only half the battle. The documentation—the functional specifications, the traceability matrix, and the validation protocols—is the "source of truth" that auditors care about. Unfortunately, 67% of legacy systems lack accurate documentation. When you attempt a "Big Bang" rewrite of a clinical research platform, you aren't just writing code; you are performing digital archaeology.

Architects often spend 18 to 24 months trying to replicate legacy business logic that was never written down. They interview retired SMEs, guess at edge cases in trial randomization logic, and manually map database schemas that have been mutated over decades. This manual "archaeology" is why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines.

Stop Guessing: Video as the Source of Truth#

The fundamental flaw in modernizing clinical research is the reliance on human memory and outdated PDFs. Replay shifts the paradigm by using Visual Reverse Engineering. Instead of reading 500 pages of outdated documentation, you record a clinical coordinator performing a real-world workflow—like patient enrollment or adverse event reporting.

Replay captures the DOM state, the network calls, and the business logic execution. It doesn't just record a video; it records the DNA of the application. This allows organizations to move from a black box to a documented codebase without the manual overhead.

💰 ROI Insight: Manual documentation and screen mapping typically take 40 hours per screen in complex clinical systems. With Replay, this is reduced to 4 hours—a 90% reduction in manual labor.

From Legacy EDC to Modern React: A Technical Deep Dive#

When modernizing clinical research, the goal is often to move from a clunky, table-heavy legacy UI to a modern, responsive React-based Design System. The challenge is preserving the complex validation rules (e.g., "If Patient Age < 18, hide Pregnancy Test field").

Replay's AI Automation Suite extracts these rules directly from the recorded session. Here is an example of a modern React component generated by Replay from a legacy clinical form recording:

typescript
// Generated by Replay Visual Reverse Engineering
// Source: Legacy_EDC_Enrollment_v4.jsp
// Logic: Preserves conditional validation for GxP compliance

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { ModernInput, ModernSelect, ValidationAlert } from '@org/clinical-design-system';

interface EnrollmentData {
  patientInitials: string;
  dateOfBirth: string;
  isMinor: boolean;
  informedConsentDate: string;
}

export const ClinicalEnrollmentForm: React.FC = () => {
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState<Partial<EnrollmentData>>({});
  const [errors, setErrors] = useState<string[]>([]);

  // Business logic extracted from legacy network trace and DOM state
  const validateInformedConsent = (dob: string, consentDate: string) => {
    const age = calculateAge(new Date(dob));
    if (age < 18 && !formData.isMinor) {
      return "Minor consent protocol must be flagged for patients under 18.";
    }
    return null;
  };

  return (
    <form className="space-y-4 p-6 bg-white shadow-sm">
      <ModernInput 
        label="Patient Initials"
        value={formData.patientInitials}
        onChange={(v) => setFormData({...formData, patientInitials: v})}
        maxLength={3}
      />
      <ModernInput 
        type="date"
        label="Date of Birth"
        onChange={(v) => setFormData({...formData, dateOfBirth: v})}
      />
      {/* Logic extracted from legacy conditional rendering */}
      {formData.isMinor && (
        <ValidationAlert message="Guardian signature required for GxP compliance." />
      )}
      <button className="btn-primary">Submit to Clinical Cloud</button>
    </form>
  );
};

Automating the API Contract#

One of the biggest pain points in modernizing clinical research is the backend. Most legacy systems use SOAP or proprietary XML formats. Replay automatically generates modern API contracts (OpenAPI/Swagger) by observing the data exchanged during the recording.

yaml
# Generated API Contract from Replay Recording
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
  title: Clinical Data Extraction API
  version: 1.0.0
paths:
  /v1/patient/enroll:
    post:
      summary: Extracted from Legacy Enrollment Workflow
      requestBody:
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              type: object
              properties:
                initials: {type: string, example: "JD"}
                dob: {type: string, format: date}
                site_id: {type: integer}
      responses:
        '200':
          description: Enrollment Successful

Three Steps to Modernizing Clinical Research Systems#

Step 1: Visual Recording and Workflow Mapping#

Start by identifying the high-value workflows that are currently slowing down trial timelines. Using Replay, a Subject Matter Expert (SME) records the end-to-end process of a clinical task. This replaces the "Requirement Gathering" phase that usually takes months.

Step 2: Extraction and Blueprinting#

Replay’s Blueprints engine parses the recording to identify every UI component, data dependency, and business rule. It builds a visual map of the architecture. In a regulated environment, this provides an immediate "As-Is" documentation set that is 100% accurate because it is based on actual system behavior, not human interpretation.

Step 3: Automated Code Generation and Test Suite Creation#

Once the "As-Is" state is captured, Replay generates the "To-Be" code. Crucially for pharma, it also generates E2E (End-to-End) Tests.

⚠️ Warning: In clinical systems, a lack of automated regression tests is the leading cause of validation failure during upgrades. Manual testing is no longer sustainable for modern release cycles.

Solving the Documentation Gap#

67% of legacy systems lack documentation. In clinical research, this isn't just a technical debt issue—it's a compliance risk. When an auditor asks how a specific data point is calculated in your 20-year-old CTMS, "we don't know" is not an acceptable answer.

Replay acts as an automated documentation engine. By recording the system in use, you generate:

• •Functional Specifications: Automatically derived from user flows.
• •Technical Debt Audit: Identify which parts of the legacy system are redundant.
• •API Documentation: Modern contracts for legacy endpoints.
• •Traceability Matrix: Map UI elements directly to the underlying business logic.

💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay to document your "Shadow IT." Many clinical trials rely on unauthorized Excel macros or legacy Access databases. Recording these workflows is the first step to bringing them into a governed, modern environment.

The Future: Understanding Over Rewriting#

The future of modernizing clinical research isn't about hiring 500 developers to rewrite code from scratch. It’s about understanding what you already have. The logic inside your legacy systems represents decades of institutional knowledge and regulatory compliance. You cannot afford to lose that in a rewrite.

Replay allows you to "extract" that value while discarding the obsolete technology. By reducing the time-to-modernize from 18 months to a few weeks, pharma companies can pivot faster to decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) gathering without being held back by their core systems.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle HIPAA and SOC2 requirements?#

Replay is built for highly regulated industries. We offer On-Premise deployment options where no data leaves your firewall. The platform is SOC2 compliant and HIPAA-ready, ensuring that Protected Health Information (PHI) used during recording is handled according to clinical standards.

Can Replay handle complex business logic, or just UI?#

While Replay excels at UI extraction, its true power lies in Flows. It captures the network layer and state transitions, allowing it to reconstruct the underlying business logic. If a legacy system performs a complex dosage calculation, Replay identifies the inputs, the outputs, and the triggers, allowing you to port that logic into a modern microservice.

What is the average time savings for a clinical system migration?#

Our enterprise partners see an average of 70% time savings. A typical clinical screen that takes 40+ hours to manually document, design, and code can be processed through Replay in under 4 hours. This moves the timeline for a 50-screen application from 12 months to roughly 6-8 weeks.

Does this replace our validation team?#

No. Replay empowers your validation team. Instead of spending months writing manual test scripts and documentation, they can use the auto-generated documentation and E2E tests as the basis for their validation package, significantly accelerating the UAT (User Acceptance Testing) phase.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.