The most dangerous component in a modern aircraft isn't a faulty turbine or a frayed wire—it’s the 30-year-old COBOL or PowerBuilder-based maintenance system that manages its service records. In aerospace, where technical debt is measured in decades and the cost of a system failure is measured in lives, the "Big Bang" rewrite is a catastrophic risk that 70% of organizations fail to navigate.
Modernizing aerospace maintenance requires a surgical approach. We can no longer afford to spend 18 months in "discovery" only to find that the original business logic was lost when the lead architect retired in 2005. The future of enterprise modernization isn't rewriting from scratch; it’s understanding what you already have through visual reverse engineering.
TL;DR: Modernizing aerospace maintenance systems requires moving from manual "code archaeology" to automated visual reverse engineering with Replay, reducing modernization timelines from years to weeks while preserving critical business logic.
The $3.6 Trillion Anchor: Why Aerospace is Stuck#
The global technical debt bubble has reached $3.6 trillion, and the aerospace sector carries a disproportionate share. Most Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) systems are "black boxes." They are undocumented, brittle, and running on infrastructure that belongs in a museum.
When a VP of Engineering at a Tier-1 aerospace firm decides to modernize, they typically face the "Archaeology Problem." Because 67% of legacy systems lack up-to-date documentation, teams spend the first six months of a project just trying to map out what the current system actually does. This is where the 18-24 month timeline begins, and where most projects die.
The Failure of Manual Extraction#
The traditional approach to modernizing aerospace maintenance involves hiring a small army of consultants to manually read legacy source code and interview end-users.
- •Manual Documentation: 40 hours average per screen.
- •Human Error: Business logic is often misinterpreted or missed entirely.
- •Scope Creep: By the time the "current state" is documented, the business requirements have already shifted.
Comparing Modernization Strategies#
| Approach | Timeline | Risk | Cost | Logic Preservation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Bang Rewrite | 18-24 months | High (70% fail) | $$$$ | Low (Complete loss) |
| Strangler Fig | 12-18 months | Medium | $$$ | Medium (Incremental) |
| Replay (Visual RE) | 2-8 weeks | Low | $ | High (Pixel-perfect) |
💰 ROI Insight: By switching from manual screen mapping to Replay’s visual extraction, enterprise teams reduce the cost per screen from roughly $6,000 (40 hours of labor) to $600 (4 hours of labor).
Visual Reverse Engineering: A New Standard#
Replay changes the paradigm by using video as the source of truth. Instead of digging through obfuscated legacy code, Replay records real user workflows—like an engineer logging a Part 145 maintenance release—and extracts the underlying architecture.
This isn't just a screen recording. Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the DOM mutations, network calls, and state changes during the recording to generate functional React components and API contracts.
From Black Box to Documented Codebase#
In aerospace, you cannot guess at business logic. If a maintenance form requires a specific validation for a Boeing 737-800 engine mount, that logic must be preserved.
Replay’s Flows feature maps these complex architectural paths, while Blueprints allows architects to edit the extracted components before they are committed to the new design system.
typescript// Example: React component extracted via Replay from a legacy MRO terminal // Original: Green-screen terminal 'Form 8130-3' // Generated: Modern, type-safe React component with preserved logic import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, Alert } from '@replay-library/ui'; interface MaintenanceRecordProps { partId: string; airworthinessDate: string; inspectorId: string; } export const AirworthinessForm: React.FC<MaintenanceRecordProps> = ({ partId, airworthinessDate, inspectorId }) => { const [isValid, setIsValid] = useState<boolean>(false); // Replay extracted this specific validation logic from observed legacy behavior const validateAerospaceCompliance = (id: string) => { const regex = /^[A-Z]{2}-\d{4}-\d{2}$/; return regex.test(id); }; return ( <div className="p-6 bg-slate-50 border rounded-lg"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Log Airworthiness Release</h2> <TextField label="Part Serial Number" value={partId} error={!validateAerospaceCompliance(partId)} /> <TextField label="Inspector ID" value={inspectorId} readOnly /> <div className="mt-4"> <Button variant="primary" onClick={() => console.log("Submitting to Modernized API...")} > Authorize Release </Button> </div> {!validateAerospaceCompliance(partId) && ( <Alert type="warning" message="Part ID does not match FAA format requirements." /> )} </div> ); };
The 4-Step Modernization Workflow for Aerospace#
Modernizing a mission-critical system requires a structured, repeatable process. Replay facilitates this through its integrated suite of tools.
Step 1: Workflow Recording (The Source of Truth)#
A subject matter expert (SME) performs a standard maintenance task in the legacy system while Replay records the session. This captures every edge case, every weird validation rule, and every hidden field that isn't in the (non-existent) documentation.
Step 2: Component & Logic Extraction#
Replay’s AI Automation Suite parses the recording. It identifies UI patterns and groups them into a Library (Design System). Simultaneously, it identifies the data structures being sent to the mainframe or legacy database.
Step 3: API Contract Generation#
One of the biggest hurdles in aerospace modernization is the "Data Gap." Legacy systems often use proprietary protocols. Replay generates OpenAPI/Swagger contracts by observing the data flow during the recording.
yaml# Generated API Contract from Replay Flow Analysis openapi: 3.0.0 info: title: Aerospace MRO Legacy Bridge version: 1.0.0 paths: /maintenance/records/{partId}: get: summary: Retrieves historical maintenance logs parameters: - name: partId in: path required: true schema: type: string responses: '200': description: OK content: application/json: schema: $ref: '#/components/schemas/MaintenanceLog' components: schemas: MaintenanceLog: type: object properties: logId: { type: string } timestamp: { type: string, format: date-time } status: { type: string, enum: [SERVICEABLE, UNREPAIRABLE, OVERHAULED] }
Step 4: Technical Debt Audit & Deployment#
Before the new code is deployed, Replay provides a Technical Debt Audit. It compares the legacy workflow to the new React-based workflow to ensure 100% parity. Because Replay is built for regulated environments, this process is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, with on-premise deployment options for high-security aerospace facilities.
⚠️ Warning: Never attempt to modernize an aerospace system without a side-by-side parity check. Visual reverse engineering provides the only reliable baseline for E2E (End-to-End) testing against legacy behavior.
Overcoming the "Document Without Archaeology" Hurdle#
Most modernization projects fail because they try to fix everything at once. They treat the legacy system as an enemy to be destroyed rather than a repository of business intelligence.
Replay allows you to "document without archaeology." Instead of spending months reading 1990s-era C++ or Java code, you document the behavior of the system. This behavior is the only thing that matters to the business.
- •Preserved Logic: If the legacy system had a specific "if/then" quirk for international shipping of hazardous materials, Replay captures it.
- •Automated E2E Tests: Replay generates tests based on the recorded workflows, ensuring the new system behaves exactly like the old one where it counts.
- •Design System Consistency: By extracting components into a Library, you ensure that the new UI isn't just a "reskin," but a consistent, modern design system that reduces user training time.
📝 Note: In highly regulated industries like aerospace or government, the "Audit Trail" of modernization is just as important as the code itself. Replay provides a visual record of how every new component was derived from the legacy system.
The Future of Aerospace Engineering#
We are entering an era where the speed of software updates must match the speed of hardware innovation. Aerospace companies can no longer wait 24 months for a UI refresh or a new data integration.
By utilizing Replay, organizations move from a state of "Legacy Dread" to "Continuous Modernization." You don't rewrite the system once every 20 years; you evolve it every week by continuously extracting, documenting, and improving your core workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions#
How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#
While traditional manual extraction takes 40+ hours per screen, Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours. For a standard aerospace maintenance module with 50 screens, you can move from "Legacy Black Box" to "Documented React Codebase" in about 3-5 weeks.
What about business logic preservation?#
Replay doesn't just copy the UI; it records the interactions and data transformations. Our AI Automation Suite identifies the logic triggers (e.g., "Disable 'Submit' if 'Part Number' is empty") and reflects those in the generated React components and API contracts.
Is Replay secure enough for aerospace and defense?#
Yes. Replay is built for regulated environments. We offer SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-ready protocols, and, most importantly for the aerospace sector, an On-Premise deployment model. Your data and legacy recordings never have to leave your secure network.
Does Replay support green-screen/terminal-based systems?#
Absolutely. Replay’s visual extraction engine is platform-agnostic. Whether your legacy system is a 3270 terminal, a PowerBuilder desktop app, or an early web-based Java app, if a user can interact with it, Replay can extract it.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.