Medical Device Software Reconstruction: Achieving FDA Parity through Visual Reverse Engineering

When a clinician looks at a patient monitoring screen, a 20-pixel shift in a heart rate trend line or a delayed UI response isn't just a "front-end bug"—it is a potential clinical risk. In the world of MedTech, the user interface is a part of the medical device itself, subject to the same rigorous FDA Class II or III validation as the underlying hardware. Yet, as the $3.6 trillion global technical debt continues to mount, thousands of critical medical applications remain trapped in aging frameworks like Silverlight, Delphi, or legacy WinForms.

The traditional path to modernization is a suicide mission: medical device software reconstruction through manual rewrites fails 70% of the time. When you lack the original documentation—a reality for 67% of legacy systems—developers are forced to "guess" the business logic by clicking through the old UI. This leads to "logic drift," where the new system fails to achieve functional parity with the validated legacy state, resulting in months of regulatory delays.

Replay changes this trajectory by replacing manual interpretation with Visual Reverse Engineering. By recording real user workflows, Replay converts legacy UIs into documented React code, ensuring that the reconstructed interface maintains 1:1 parity with the original validated workflows.

TL;DR:

• •The Problem: Manual medical device software reconstruction takes 18-24 months and risks FDA non-compliance due to "logic drift."
• •The Stats: 70% of rewrites fail; 67% of systems have no documentation; manual reconstruction takes 40 hours per screen.
• •The Solution: Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering to reduce reconstruction time by 70%, moving from months to weeks.
• •The Result: Documented React components, automated design systems, and guaranteed functional parity for regulated environments.

---

The Documentation Gap in Medical Device Software Reconstruction#

The greatest hurdle in medical device software reconstruction is the "black box" nature of legacy code. Most enterprise medical systems were built decades ago; the original architects have retired, and the design documents (if they ever existed) are long lost.

Video-to-code is the process of using computer vision and AI to analyze video recordings of legacy software interactions and automatically generate equivalent, modern source code that replicates the layout, state transitions, and logic of the original system.

According to Replay’s analysis, the average enterprise spends 40 hours per screen when manually reconstructing a legacy UI. This includes time spent on CSS discovery, state mapping, and functional testing. With Replay, this is reduced to 4 hours per screen. When you are dealing with a complex diagnostic suite containing 200+ screens, that is the difference between a 2-year project and a 4-month project.

Why Parity is Non-Negotiable#

For FDA-regulated software (SaMD - Software as a Medical Device), "close enough" is a liability. If the legacy system had a specific validation check for a drug dosage input, the reconstructed React component must mirror that behavior exactly.

Replay bridges this gap by using the "Flows" feature to map every user path. Instead of developers interpreting a PDF of requirements, they are working from a high-fidelity reconstruction of the actual validated software in motion.

---

Technical Architecture: From Legacy Video to Validated React#

The process of medical device software reconstruction requires a transition from imperative, legacy state management to a modern, declarative React architecture without losing the underlying business rules.

Industry experts recommend a "Component-First" approach to reconstruction. This involves extracting the atomic elements of the legacy UI—buttons, input fields, waveform displays—and standardizing them into a modern Design System.

Example: Reconstructing a Legacy Vital Signs Monitor#

In a legacy WinForms application, a vital signs display might be tightly coupled to a serial port listener. In the reconstructed React version, we need to maintain the visual timing and data precision while decoupling the UI.

typescript
// Reconstructed VitalSignDisplay.tsx
// Generated via Replay Blueprints from legacy recording

import React, { useEffect, useState } from 'react';
import { LineChart, Line, YAxis, ResponsiveContainer } from 'recharts';

interface VitalProps {
  patientId: string;
  threshold: number;
  onAlarm: (value: number) => void;
}

export const VitalSignDisplay: React.FC<VitalProps> = ({ patientId, threshold, onAlarm }) => {
  const [data, setData] = useState<{ time: string; bpm: number }[]>([]);

  // Parity Logic: Replicating the 250ms refresh rate of the legacy system
  useEffect(() => {
    const stream = MedicalDataStream.subscribe(patientId, (newBpm) => {
      setData((prev) => [...prev.slice(-20), { time: new Date().toISOString(), bpm: newBpm }]);
      
      if (newBpm > threshold) {
        onAlarm(newBpm);
      }
    });
    return () => stream.unsubscribe();
  }, [patientId, threshold]);

  return (
    <div className="medical-card border-l-4 border-red-500 bg-slate-900 p-4">
      <h3 className="text-xs font-bold text-slate-400 uppercase">Heart Rate (BPM)</h3>
      <div className="flex items-baseline gap-2">
        <span className="text-4xl font-mono text-green-400">
          {data[data.length - 1]?.bpm || '--'}
        </span>
      </div>
      <ResponsiveContainer width="100%" height={100}>
        <LineChart data={data}>
          <Line type="monotone" dataKey="bpm" stroke="#4ade80" strokeWidth={2} dot={false} />
          <YAxis hide domain={[0, 200]} />
        </LineChart>
      </ResponsiveContainer>
    </div>
  );
};

This code snippet demonstrates how medical device software reconstruction moves beyond simple aesthetics. The logic—specifically the 250ms refresh rate and the alarm thresholding—is preserved from the legacy recording and implemented in a type-safe, maintainable React component.

---

Comparing Reconstruction Methodologies#

When deciding how to approach your modernization project, it is essential to look at the data. Manual rewrites are often seen as the "safe" choice, but the statistics suggest otherwise.

As shown in the table, the efficiency gains of using Replay are not just marginal; they are transformative. By automating the extraction of the UI layer, your senior engineers can focus on the high-risk logic and backend integration, rather than fighting with CSS grid layouts to match a 1998 VB6 form.

For more on the costs of legacy systems, see our article on Technical Debt in Healthcare.

---

Maintaining FDA Parity during Medical Device Software Reconstruction#

The FDA's Quality System Regulation (QSR) requires that software changes are validated to ensure they meet user needs and intended uses. In a manual rewrite, proving that "New Screen A" performs exactly like "Legacy Screen A" is a documentation nightmare.

Visual Reverse Engineering provides an immutable audit trail. When you record a workflow in Replay, you are creating a "Golden Record" of the legacy behavior.

1. The Library: Establishing a Single Source of Truth#

Replay’s "Library" feature acts as the central repository for your reconstructed Design System. In medical software, consistency isn't just about branding; it's about usability. A "Confirm" button must always be in the same location to prevent user error. By extracting these components directly from the legacy video, Replay ensures that the spatial relationships and visual cues that clinicians rely on are preserved.

2. Flows: Mapping the Clinical Path#

The "Flows" feature allows architects to visualize the entire architecture of the application. If a legacy diagnostic tool requires a specific five-step sequence to calibrate a lens, Replay captures that sequence. During the medical device software reconstruction, this flow is used as the blueprint for the React Router configuration and state machine.

3. Blueprints: The Bridge to Code#

The "Blueprints" editor allows your team to refine the AI-generated code. This is where the "Human-in-the-Loop" ensures that the generated TypeScript meets your internal coding standards and security requirements.

typescript
// Example of a validated input component with built-in parity checks
import { useForm } from 'react-hook-form';

export const DosageInput = ({ initialValue, maxSafeLimit }: { initialValue: number, maxSafeLimit: number }) => {
  const { register, handleSubmit, formState: { errors } } = useForm({
    defaultValues: { dosage: initialValue }
  });

  // Replay captured this specific validation logic from the legacy "DosageModule.dll"
  const validateDosage = (value: number) => {
    if (value > maxSafeLimit) return "Exceeds safety threshold";
    if (value <= 0) return "Invalid dosage";
    return true;
  };

  return (
    <form className="p-4 bg-white shadow-md rounded">
      <label className="block text-sm font-medium text-gray-700">Enter Dosage (mg)</label>
      <input
        {...register("dosage", { validate: validateDosage })}
        className={`mt-1 block w-full rounded-md ${errors.dosage ? 'border-red-500' : 'border-gray-300'}`}
      />
      {errors.dosage && <p className="mt-2 text-sm text-red-600">{errors.dosage.message}</p>}
    </form>
  );
};

---

The AI Automation Suite: Accelerating Compliance#

Modernizing medical software in a vacuum is impossible. You need to consider SOC2, HIPAA, and often On-Premise requirements. Replay is built specifically for these high-stakes, regulated environments.

According to Replay's analysis, the AI Automation Suite can identify patterns across hundreds of legacy screens, automatically identifying "Master-Detail" views or "Data Grids" and applying a unified React template. This ensures that the medical device software reconstruction doesn't just result in a collection of disparate screens, but a cohesive, modern application architecture.

Internal Link Opportunity#

To understand how this applies to large-scale enterprise shifts, read our guide on Modernizing Financial Services Infrastructure, which shares many of the same regulatory hurdles as MedTech.

---

Overcoming the "Rewrite vs. Reconstruct" Dilemma#

The term "rewrite" implies starting from zero. It implies that the legacy system has no value. But in medical software, the legacy system is the result of years of clinical feedback and regulatory scrutiny. It is incredibly valuable.

Medical device software reconstruction is about honoring that value while upgrading the delivery mechanism. It’s about taking the validated "brain" of the application and giving it a modern "nervous system" (React, TypeScript, Cloud-native APIs).

The Implementation Roadmap#

1. •Record: Use Replay to capture every validated workflow in the legacy system.
2. •Analyze: Use the Library feature to identify common components and the Flows feature to map the architecture.
3. •Generate: Use Blueprints to generate the initial React/TypeScript codebase.
4. •Refine: Senior architects review the code, ensuring it meets security and performance standards.
5. •Validate: Run side-by-side tests between the legacy system and the reconstructed UI to ensure 1:1 parity.

By following this roadmap, organizations can avoid the 18-month average enterprise rewrite timeline and instead deliver a modernized, validated product in a fraction of the time.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does medical device software reconstruction ensure FDA compliance?#

Reconstruction through Replay focuses on maintaining functional and visual parity. By using video recordings as the source of truth, teams can create a clear traceability matrix between the legacy validated system and the new code. This reduces the risk of "logic drift," which is a primary cause of regulatory rejection during modernization.

Can Replay handle legacy systems with no source code available?#

Yes. Because Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering, it does not need access to the original legacy source code (which is missing in 67% of cases). It analyzes the behavior and output of the system through video, allowing for medical device software reconstruction even when the original codebase is a compiled "black box" or the documentation is lost.

Is Replay's AI-generated code secure and HIPAA-ready?#

Absolutely. Replay is built for regulated industries including Healthcare and Financial Services. We offer SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-ready data handling, and the option for On-Premise deployment to ensure that sensitive medical data never leaves your secure environment during the reconstruction process.

What is the difference between a rewrite and reconstruction?#

A rewrite typically involves developers looking at a legacy system and trying to build it again from scratch, often leading to missing features and logic errors. Medical device software reconstruction using Replay is a data-driven process that extracts the exact specifications of the legacy UI to ensure the new system is a modernized twin of the original.

---

The Future of MedTech Modernization#

The pressure to modernize is no longer just about "looking current." It is about interoperability, security, and the ability to integrate AI-driven diagnostics that legacy frameworks simply cannot support. However, the risk of a failed rewrite is too high for most medical device manufacturers to stomach.

By leveraging medical device software reconstruction through Replay, enterprise architects can finally break the cycle of technical debt. You can move from outdated, unsupported frameworks to a clean, documented React design system in weeks, not years. You save 70% of the time, 80% of the cost, and 100% of the regulatory headache.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay