The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just a line item on a balance sheet; it’s a systemic risk to the global financial infrastructure. In high-stakes environments like Tier-1 banks and insurance providers, the distance between a COBOL-based mainframe and a modern React micro-frontend is often 40 years of undocumented logic, lost source code, and retired developers. Most modernization attempts fail not because the target technology is too complex, but because the source system is a black box.
TL;DR: Successful mainframe-to-micro-frontend modernization requires moving from manual "code archaeology" to automated visual reverse engineering, reducing screen extraction time from 40 hours to 4 hours while ensuring 100% logic parity.
The Archaeology Tax: Why 70% of Legacy Rewrites Fail#
The standard approach to legacy modernization is fundamentally broken. When a VP of Engineering initiates a "Big Bang" rewrite, they are usually signing up for an 18-24 month odyssey that has a 70% chance of exceeding its budget or being canceled entirely.
The primary culprit is the "Archaeology Tax." In 67% of legacy systems, documentation is either non-existent or dangerously outdated. This forces senior architects to spend months interviewing users and digging through millions of lines of spaghetti code just to understand what the system actually does.
The Manual Extraction Bottleneck#
Traditionally, a developer must:
- •Observe a user performing a task in a terminal or legacy web app.
- •Trace that action through layers of middleware and mainframe logic.
- •Manually document the business rules (e.g., "If the account is in 'Restricted' status and the transaction exceeds $5k, trigger a secondary KYC check").
- •Write a modern React component and API from scratch to replicate that behavior.
This process takes an average of 40 hours per screen. In a financial application with 500+ screens, you’re looking at years of manual labor before the first micro-frontend is even deployed.
| Metric | Manual Modernization | Replay Visual Extraction |
|---|---|---|
| Time per Screen | 40 Hours | 4 Hours |
| Documentation Accuracy | 40-60% (Human Error) | 99% (Video-based Truth) |
| Project Timeline | 18 - 24 Months | 2 - 8 Weeks |
| Risk of Regression | High | Low (E2E Tests Generated) |
| Knowledge Transfer | Manual Interviews | Automated Knowledge Base |
Moving From Black Box to Documented Codebase#
The future of modernization isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. This is where Replay shifts the paradigm. Instead of reading dead code, we record live user workflows. By treating the video of a user interaction as the "source of truth," Replay’s engine reverse-engineers the underlying logic, UI structure, and state transitions.
💰 ROI Insight: By automating the extraction of UI components and business logic, enterprise teams typically see a 70% reduction in modernization timelines. What used to take a quarter now takes a sprint.
Bridging the Gap: Mainframe to Micro-Frontend (MFE)#
Financial services are moving toward Micro-Frontends to enable independent scaling and deployment of modular banking functions (e.g., Credit Cards, Mortgages, Wealth Management). However, the "glue" between a CICS transaction on a mainframe and a modern MFE is often a mess of brittle APIs.
Replay bridges this gap by generating documented React components and API contracts directly from recorded sessions.
typescript// Example: React Micro-Frontend Component generated by Replay // Source: Legacy "Account Overview" Terminal Screen import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, Card, Table, StatusBadge } from '@enterprise/design-system'; import { getAccountDetails } from './api/account-service'; interface AccountProps { accountId: string; userRole: 'ADMIN' | 'VIEWER'; } export const LegacyAccountMigrated: React.FC<AccountProps> = ({ accountId, userRole }) => { const [data, setData] = useState<any>(null); const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true); // Business Logic extracted from legacy flow: // 1. Validate account prefix (Logic preserved from COBOL module ACCT-VAL-01) // 2. Map legacy status codes (01 -> Active, 02 -> Pending) useEffect(() => { async function fetchData() { const result = await getAccountDetails(accountId); setData(result); setLoading(false); } fetchData(); }, [accountId]); if (loading) return <Spinner />; return ( <Card title={`Account: ${data.accountNumber}`}> <StatusBadge status={data.statusCode === '01' ? 'success' : 'warning'}> {data.statusLabel} </StatusBadge> <Table data={data.transactions} columns={['Date', 'Amount', 'Description']} /> {userRole === 'ADMIN' && ( <Button onClick={() => handleOverride()}>Manual Override</Button> )} </Card> ); };
The 3-Step Visual Reverse Engineering Workflow#
To move from a 40-year-old mainframe to a modern MFE architecture, we follow a structured extraction process that eliminates the guesswork.
Step 1: Workflow Recording & Assessment#
Instead of reading code, you record the "Happy Path" and "Edge Case" workflows of your expert users. Replay captures every DOM change, network request, and state transition. This creates a visual blueprint of the legacy system.
Step 2: Automated Extraction & Component Generation#
Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording. It identifies recurring UI patterns and maps them to your modern Design System (Library). If a legacy table appears across 50 screens, Replay identifies it as a single reusable React component.
Step 3: API Contract & E2E Test Generation#
Modernization fails when the new UI doesn't talk to the old backend correctly. Replay generates Swagger/OpenAPI specifications based on the actual traffic observed during the recording. It also generates Playwright or Cypress E2E tests to ensure the new MFE behaves exactly like the legacy screen.
⚠️ Warning: Never attempt a modernization project without a "Side-by-Side" validation strategy. If your new React component doesn't produce the exact same output as the mainframe terminal for a given input, your financial data integrity is at risk.
Solving the Documentation Gap in Regulated Environments#
For Financial Services and Healthcare, "I don't know how this works" is not an acceptable answer for auditors. SOC2 and HIPAA compliance require clear documentation of how data is handled.
Replay’s Blueprints and Flows features automatically generate the technical documentation that your team is too busy to write. It creates a living map of your architecture, showing exactly how data flows from a user input to a backend mainframe record.
Generating API Contracts from Legacy Traffic#
One of the hardest parts of mainframe modernization is the "Middle Tier." Replay extracts the implicit contracts.
yaml# Generated OpenAPI Spec from Replay Recording openapi: 3.0.0 info: title: Legacy Account API version: 1.0.0 paths: /v1/accounts/{id}: get: summary: Extracted from Legacy Transaction ACCT-LOOKUP parameters: - name: id in: path required: true schema: type: string responses: '200': description: OK content: application/json: schema: $ref: '#/components/schemas/Account'
Challenging the "Strangler Fig" Status Quo#
The Strangler Fig pattern—gradually replacing legacy modules with new services—is the industry standard. But even the Strangler Fig is too slow for the current pace of digital transformation. It still relies on manual discovery.
Visual Reverse Engineering is the "Turbocharger" for the Strangler Fig. By using Replay, you aren't just strangling the old system; you are using the old system as a template to generate the new one.
💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay to document the "As-Is" state before you even decide on the "To-Be" architecture. Understanding the complexity upfront prevents the mid-project "scope creep" that kills most enterprise rewrites.
The Financial Impact of "Wait and See"#
Every month a legacy system remains in production without documentation, its technical debt interest grows.
- •Maintenance Cost: Mainframe developers are retiring; their salaries are skyrocketing.
- •Agility Cost: A simple UI change that takes 2 hours in React takes 2 weeks in a monolithic legacy stack.
- •Opportunity Cost: While you struggle to maintain a 40-year-old system, fintech startups are shipping features daily.
📝 Note: Replay offers On-Premise deployment for highly regulated industries, ensuring that your sensitive financial workflows and PII never leave your secure environment.
Frequently Asked Questions#
How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#
While a manual rewrite takes 18-24 months, Replay typically reduces this to days or weeks. For a standard financial dashboard, we can move from a recorded legacy session to a documented React component in under 4 hours.
Does Replay require access to the legacy source code?#
No. Replay performs Visual Reverse Engineering. It analyzes the rendered output, DOM, and network traffic. This is critical for systems where the original source code is lost or written in obscure languages like older versions of COBOL or Delphi.
How does Replay ensure business logic isn't lost?#
By recording real user workflows, Replay captures the "implicit" business logic—the way the system actually behaves in the real world. We then generate E2E tests (Playwright/Cypress) that compare the legacy system's output against the new system's output to ensure 100% parity.
Can Replay handle green-screen terminal emulators?#
Yes. Replay can record and analyze any web-based terminal emulator or legacy web application (Java Applets, Silverlight, etc.) to extract the underlying data fields and workflow steps.
Is the generated code "clean"?#
Yes. Replay doesn't just "scrape" the UI. It maps legacy elements to your specific Design System and generates clean, typed TypeScript/React code that follows your organization's coding standards.
Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.