Back to Blog
February 19, 2026 min readlogic leakage fintech recovering

Logic Leakage in FinTech: Recovering Lost Interest Calculators via UI Forensics

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Logic Leakage in FinTech: Recovering Lost Interest Calculators via UI Forensics

The most dangerous asset in a financial institution isn’t a volatile stock—it’s a "black box" interest calculator. I’ve walked into Tier-1 banks where the core mortgage amortization logic exists only in a compiled COBOL routine or a 20-year-old JavaScript file that no living employee dares to touch. When the source code is a mystery but the UI still functions, you are experiencing logic leakage. The business rules are "leaking" through the interface, and for most architects, logic leakage fintech recovering is the only way to prevent a catastrophic system failure during a cloud migration.

According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any form of up-to-date documentation. In the highly regulated world of FinTech, this isn't just a technical debt problem; it's a compliance nightmare. If you cannot explain to a regulator exactly how a specific interest rate was calculated because the original documentation was lost in a 2008 merger, you are sitting on a ticking time bomb.

TL;DR: Logic leakage occurs when critical business rules are trapped in legacy UIs without backing documentation. This article explores how "UI Forensics" and Visual Reverse Engineering via Replay allow architects to recover lost interest calculators by recording user workflows and converting them into documented React components, reducing modernization timelines from years to weeks.

The Invisible Crisis of Logic Leakage#

In the enterprise, we often treat the UI as a thin veneer over a robust backend. However, in legacy FinTech stacks, the "fat client" or "heavy frontend" era resulted in massive amounts of validation and calculation logic being baked directly into the browser or desktop client.

When we talk about logic leakage fintech recovering, we are referring to the systematic extraction of these buried rules. Industry experts recommend a "Forensics-First" approach because traditional manual code audits are often impossible. If the original developers are gone and the build pipeline is broken, the only source of truth is the running application itself.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of capturing the state changes, input-output relationships, and visual transitions of a running application to reconstruct its underlying business logic and component architecture.

The global technical debt currently sits at a staggering $3.6 trillion. A significant portion of this debt is tied up in these "lost" calculators. When a bank decides to move from a legacy mainframe-backed web portal to a modern React-based micro-frontend, they often realize the "Interest Calculation Engine" is actually just 4,000 lines of unminified jQuery.

Why Manual Recovery Fails 70% of the Time#

The standard approach to legacy modernization is a "Big Bang" rewrite. An architect assigns a team to read the old code, document the requirements, and rewrite it in a modern language.

This fails because:

  1. Edge Case Blindness: Manual auditors miss the "if (state === 'NY' && date < 1998)" branches that handle specific regulatory quirks.
  2. Timeline Bloat: The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months, and most fail to ever reach feature parity.
  3. Documentation Gap: Since 67% of systems lack docs, developers are essentially guessing the "why" behind the "what."

Comparison: Manual Extraction vs. Replay Visual Reverse Engineering#

FeatureManual Legacy RewriteReplay Visual Forensics
Time per Screen40+ Hours4 Hours
AccuracySubject to human error/guessing1:1 Visual & Logic Parity
DocumentationManually written (often skipped)Automated component specs
Risk of Failure70% (Industry Average)Minimal (Data-driven)
Timeline18-24 MonthsDays to Weeks

By shifting the focus to logic leakage fintech recovering through automated tools, teams can bypass the "guessing phase" of modernization. Replay captures the exact behavior of the legacy interest calculator, including how it handles rounding, leap years, and compounding frequencies, and translates that into clean, modular code.

The UI Forensics Workflow: Recovering a Lost Calculator#

To recover a lost interest calculator, we treat the legacy UI as a witness in a forensic investigation. We provide inputs, observe outputs, and record the state transitions.

Step 1: Recording the Workflow#

Using Replay, a subject matter expert (SME) records a standard workflow—for example, calculating a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage with an escrow adjustment. Replay’s engine doesn't just record pixels; it records the DOM mutations, network calls, and state changes.

Step 2: Extracting the Mathematical Model#

Once the recording is processed, the AI Automation Suite within Replay identifies the relationship between the "Principal Amount" input and the "Monthly Payment" output. This is where the logic leakage fintech recovering happens. The tool identifies that the calculation isn't just

text
(P * r) / n
, but includes a legacy-specific buffer that was never documented.

Step 3: Generating Modern React Components#

The final step is converting these findings into a modern stack. Below is a simplified example of how a recovered legacy calculation might look when transformed into a documented TypeScript component.

typescript
// Recovered via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering // Legacy Source: MortgagePortal_v2_final_OLD.js (Obfuscated) import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; interface CalculationProps { principal: number; annualRate: number; termYears: number; includeLegacyEscrowBuffer: boolean; // Recovered hidden logic } export const InterestCalculator: React.FC<CalculationProps> = ({ principal, annualRate, termYears, includeLegacyEscrowBuffer }) => { const [monthlyPayment, setMonthlyPayment] = useState<number>(0); useEffect(() => { // This logic was extracted from the legacy UI's 'calculate' click event const monthlyRate = annualRate / 12 / 100; const numberOfPayments = termYears * 12; let payment = (principal * monthlyRate * Math.pow(1 + monthlyRate, numberOfPayments)) / (Math.pow(1 + monthlyRate, numberOfPayments) - 1); // Forensic discovery: The legacy system added a 0.02% buffer for // specific regional compliance that was missing from the spec. if (includeLegacyEscrowBuffer) { payment += (principal * 0.0002) / 12; } setMonthlyPayment(Number(payment.toFixed(2))); }, [principal, annualRate, termYears, includeLegacyEscrowBuffer]); return ( <div className="p-4 border rounded shadow-sm bg-white"> <h3 className="text-lg font-bold">Recovered Mortgage Calculator</h3> <div className="mt-2"> <p>Principal: ${principal.toLocaleString()}</p> <p>Monthly Payment: <strong>${monthlyPayment}</strong></p> </div> </div> ); };

Addressing Logic Leakage in Regulated Environments#

In sectors like Healthcare and Financial Services, you cannot simply "copy-paste" logic. You need an audit trail. This is why logic leakage fintech recovering must be performed within a secure framework.

Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-readiness, and the ability to run On-Premise. This ensures that while you are extracting sensitive interest rate logic, no PII (Personally Identifiable Information) leaves your secure perimeter.

When performing logic leakage fintech recovering, it is vital to map the recovered components back to a centralized Design System. Replay’s "Library" feature acts as a repository for these recovered assets, ensuring that once a calculator is "found," it is never lost again.

Learn more about building a Design System from Legacy UI

The Technical Debt Trap#

Technical debt isn't just "messy code." It's the economic cost of the friction caused by that code. When a FinTech company spends 40 hours manually documenting a single screen, they are paying a "legacy tax." By using Replay to reduce that to 4 hours, they are effectively reclaiming 90% of their modernization budget.

Advanced Forensics: Handling Dynamic Logic#

Not all calculators are static. Some pull real-time data or have complex conditional branching based on user profiles.

Industry experts recommend using "Flows" to map these architectural dependencies. In Replay, "Flows" allow you to see how the interest calculator interacts with other parts of the system, such as a credit score API or a tax table.

Video-to-code is the process of converting visual interactions and UI state changes captured in a video recording into functional, high-quality frontend code and documentation.

Consider a scenario where a "Late Fee Calculator" only appears when a user selects a date past the 15th of the month. A manual auditor might miss this if they only test with the current date. Replay’s visual recording captures the SME interacting with the date picker, triggering the logic leakage, and automatically generates the conditional rendering logic in the new React component.

typescript
// Example of recovered conditional logic for late fees import { useMemo } from 'react'; const useLateFeeLogic = (balance: number, dueDate: Date, paymentDate: Date) => { return useMemo(() => { const diffTime = paymentDate.getTime() - dueDate.getTime(); const diffDays = Math.ceil(diffTime / (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24)); // Recovered Logic: The legacy system used a tiered fee structure // that was undocumented in the 2012 handbook. if (diffDays <= 0) return 0; if (diffDays <= 5) return 15.00; // Grace period discovered via UI Forensics if (diffDays <= 15) return balance * 0.05; return balance * 0.10; // Max fee cap }, [balance, dueDate, paymentDate]); };

The Economic Reality of Modernization#

For a typical enterprise with 500+ legacy screens, the math for manual modernization simply doesn't add up.

  • Manual Cost: 500 screens * 40 hours/screen = 20,000 developer hours. At $100/hr, that’s a $2,000,000 investment with a 70% chance of failure.
  • Replay Cost: 500 screens * 4 hours/screen = 2,000 developer hours. At $100/hr, that’s $200,000 with a documented, verifiable output.

The goal of logic leakage fintech recovering isn't just to get the new code—it's to stop paying the legacy tax. By using Replay, organizations can redirect those 18,000 saved hours into innovation rather than just "keeping the lights on."

The ROI of Visual Reverse Engineering

Frequently Asked Questions#

What exactly is logic leakage in a FinTech context?#

Logic leakage occurs when business-critical rules, such as interest calculations or fee structures, exist only in the behavior of the frontend UI and lack corresponding backend documentation or source code clarity. Recovering this logic requires forensic observation of the UI's inputs and outputs.

How does UI Forensics differ from standard web scraping?#

Web scraping only captures static data. UI Forensics, powered by tools like Replay, captures the behavior and state transitions of an application. It understands that clicking a specific button with a specific input triggers a specific mathematical function, allowing that function to be reconstructed in modern code.

Can Replay handle obfuscated or minified legacy JavaScript?#

Yes. Because Replay focuses on Visual Reverse Engineering, it observes the results of the code (DOM changes, state updates, and network traffic) rather than just reading the raw source. This makes it highly effective for logic leakage fintech recovering even when the underlying code is unreadable or minified.

Is Visual Reverse Engineering secure for banking applications?#

Replay is designed for regulated industries. It is SOC2 compliant and HIPAA-ready. For maximum security, it can be deployed On-Premise, ensuring that sensitive financial logic and user workflows never leave the organization's secure environment during the recovery process.

How does this process speed up the modernization timeline?#

By automating the discovery and documentation phase, Replay reduces the time spent on each screen from 40 hours to approximately 4 hours. This allows enterprises to condense an 18-month modernization roadmap into a matter of weeks or months, significantly reducing the risk of project abandonment.

Conclusion: Stop Guessing, Start Recovering#

The era of the 24-month "Big Bang" rewrite is over. The risks are too high, and the documentation gaps are too wide. For enterprise architects, the path forward involves embracing the logic that is already there—hidden in plain sight within your legacy UIs.

By focusing on logic leakage fintech recovering, you can turn your legacy "black boxes" into documented, modern React components that are ready for the cloud. Don't let your interest calculators remain a mystery. Use UI Forensics to reclaim your logic, reduce your technical debt, and finally move your FinTech stack into the modern era.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free