Back to Blog
January 31, 20268 min readLegal Tech Modernization:

Legal Tech Modernization: Moving from On-Prem Case Management to Modern SaaS

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just a number on a balance sheet; it’s the reason your firm’s most critical case management workflows are still trapped in a Windows XP-era interface. In the legal sector, where document integrity and audit trails are non-negotiable, the "Big Bang" rewrite is a suicide mission. 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline, and for a high-stakes legal environment, that's a risk no CTO can afford.

The traditional path to legal tech modernization involves months of "software archaeology"—paying expensive consultants to dig through undocumented VB6, Delphi, or legacy .NET codebases to understand business rules that were written by developers who retired a decade ago. 67% of these systems lack any meaningful documentation. You aren't just migrating data; you are trying to reconstruct a black box while the plane is in flight.

TL;DR: Legal tech modernization fails when firms treat it as a coding problem rather than an understanding problem; Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay allows you to extract logic from user workflows and move to SaaS in weeks, not years, saving 70% of typical migration time.

The High Cost of the "Big Bang" Rewrite#

Most legal tech modernization projects follow a predictable, tragic arc. The firm decides the on-premise case management system is too slow. They hire an agency. The agency spends six months on "discovery." They realize the business logic for "Conflict of Interest" checks is buried in 4,000 lines of stored procedures. The project timeline slips from 12 months to 24 months. By the time the SaaS version is ready, the market has moved, and the budget is gone.

ApproachTimelineRiskCostDocumentation
Big Bang Rewrite18-24 monthsHigh (70% fail)$$$$Manual/Incomplete
Strangler Fig12-18 monthsMedium$$$Partial
Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay)2-8 weeksLow$Automated/Visual

The problem is the "Manual Gap." It takes an average of 40 hours per screen to manually document, design, and code a modern replacement for a legacy interface. When your case management system has 200+ screens, you’re looking at years of work before the first user logs in.

From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

The future of legal tech modernization isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. Replay changes the paradigm by using video as the source of truth. Instead of reading dead code, you record a real user performing a "New Matter Intake" or a "Document Assembly" workflow.

Replay's engine analyzes the execution, identifies the underlying data structures, and generates documented React components and API contracts automatically. This reduces the time per screen from 40 hours to just 4 hours.

Step 1: Visual Capture of Case Workflows#

Stop looking at the source code. Start looking at the behavior. In legal systems, the UI often dictates the business logic. By recording a partner or paralegal navigating the on-premise system, Replay captures the "as-is" state of the application.

Step 2: Extracting the "Library" (Design System)#

Legal firms need consistency. Replay’s Library feature takes the recorded workflows and identifies recurring UI patterns. It then maps these to your modern Design System (Tailwind, MUI, etc.).

Step 3: Generating API Contracts and E2E Tests#

One of the biggest pain points in moving to SaaS is ensuring the new API matches the legacy data flow. Replay generates the API contracts based on the actual data exchanged during the recording.

typescript
// Example: Generated API Contract for Case Intake // Extracted via Replay AI Automation Suite export interface CaseIntakeRequest { matterId: string; clientName: string; practiceArea: 'LITIGATION' | 'CORPORATE' | 'REAL_ESTATE'; assignedAttorneyId: string; isConflictCleared: boolean; metadata: { sourceSystem: "Legacy_OnPrem_v4"; extractionDate: string; }; } export async function submitCaseIntake(data: CaseIntakeRequest): Promise<ApiResponse> { // Business logic preserved from legacy system behavior const response = await fetch('/api/v1/cases', { method: 'POST', body: JSON.stringify(data), headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } }); return response.json(); }

Step-by-Step: Modernizing a "Conflict Check" Module#

Let’s look at a practical example. You have a legacy "Conflict Check" screen that is essential for compliance but the code is a mess of legacy SQL.

Step 1: Recording the Workflow#

A compliance officer performs a standard conflict check in the on-premise app while Replay records the session. Replay tracks every state change, API call (or database hit), and UI transition.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay’s Blueprints editor identifies the form fields, the validation logic (e.g., "Client Name cannot be empty"), and the results table. It generates a clean React component.

tsx
// Example: Generated React Component from Replay Blueprint import React, { useState } from 'react'; import { Button, Input, Table, Alert } from '@/components/ui'; export const ConflictCheckModule = () => { const [query, setQuery] = useState(''); const [results, setResults] = useState([]); const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false); // Logic extracted from legacy event handlers const handleSearch = async () => { setLoading(true); try { const data = await api.searchConflicts(query); setResults(data); } catch (err) { console.error("Legacy Logic Error: Conflict Search Failed", err); } finally { setLoading(false); } }; return ( <div className="p-6 space-y-4"> <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold">Conflict of Interest Search</h2> <Input value={query} onChange={(e) => setQuery(e.target.value)} placeholder="Enter Client or Party Name..." /> <Button onClick={handleSearch} loading={loading}>Run Check</Button> {results.length > 0 && ( <Table data={results} columns={['CaseID', 'PartyRole', 'Status', 'MatchScore']} /> )} </div> ); };

Step 3: Technical Debt Audit#

While generating the code, Replay performs a technical debt audit. It flags where the legacy system had redundant logic or security vulnerabilities (like unsanitized inputs) so they don't migrate to the SaaS version.

⚠️ Warning: Never blindly copy legacy business logic into a SaaS environment without an automated audit. Legacy systems often lack the modern security headers and CSRF protections required for web-facing applications.

Solving the Documentation Gap#

67% of legacy systems lack documentation, which usually means the "documentation" exists only in the heads of a few senior engineers. When they leave, the system becomes unmaintainable.

Replay solves this by creating Flows. These are visual maps of your application’s architecture, generated directly from usage. If a developer needs to know how "Document Assembly" works, they don't look for a PDF from 2012; they look at the live Flow in Replay.

💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay to document your "Shadow IT." Often, legal teams use small, undocumented helper apps. Record them once with Replay to bring them into your official architecture map.

Built for Regulated Environments#

Legal tech modernization isn't just about speed; it's about compliance. Moving from on-premise to SaaS requires rigorous security vetting. Replay is built for these high-stakes environments:

  • SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Your data remains encrypted and handled with enterprise-grade security.
  • On-Premise Available: For firms with strict data residency requirements, Replay can run entirely within your firewall.
  • Audit Trails: Every extraction and code generation is logged, providing a clear path from legacy behavior to modern code.

💰 ROI Insight: By reducing the migration timeline from 18 months to 3 months, an average mid-sized law firm saves over $1.2M in developer salaries and consultant fees alone, not counting the opportunity cost of delayed features.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take?#

With Replay, the initial capture takes as long as the workflow itself (minutes). The AI-assisted extraction of components and logic typically takes 4 hours per screen, compared to the 40+ hours required for manual reverse engineering and coding. Most enterprise legal modules can be fully mapped in 2-4 weeks.

What about business logic preservation?#

Replay doesn't just look at the UI; it monitors the state changes and data outputs. This ensures that complex legal calculations or validation rules are captured accurately in the generated API contracts and frontend logic. We call this "Behavioral Fidelity."

Yes. Because Replay uses visual reverse engineering, it can extract logic from any system a user can interact with—whether it's a modern web app, a legacy Windows desktop application, or even a green-screen terminal emulator.

Does this replace my developers?#

No. Replay replaces the "grunt work" of manual documentation and boilerplate recreation. It allows your senior architects to focus on high-level SaaS architecture and feature innovation rather than playing digital archaeologist.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free