Insurance Platform Migration: Moving from Monolith to Micro-Frontends

The average insurance legacy migration costs $15 million and takes three years, yet 70% of these projects fail to meet their original objectives or exceed their timelines by 100%. In the insurance sector, where underwriting rules are buried in 15-year-old Java monoliths and claims processing logic exists only in the minds of developers who retired in 2019, the "Big Bang" rewrite is a suicide mission.

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just a number; it’s the reason your policy administration system can't integrate with a modern mobile app. The bottleneck isn't coding—it's archaeology. When 67% of legacy systems lack up-to-date documentation, your architects spend 80% of their time "discovery-mining" instead of building.

TL;DR: Insurance platform migration succeeds when you stop manual code archaeology and use visual reverse engineering to extract business logic into a micro-frontend architecture, reducing migration time from 18 months to weeks.

The Insurance Monolith: A Black Box Problem#

Most insurance platforms—whether for P&C, Life, or Health—are structured as tightly coupled monoliths. A change in the "Premium Calculator" module inadvertently breaks the "Claims Document Generator" because of shared state or undocumented database triggers.

When you decide to migrate to a modern stack, you face the "Document Gap." Manual extraction of a single complex insurance screen (like a multi-step underwriting workflow) takes an average of 40 hours. You have to trace the state, identify the API endpoints (often undocumented), and replicate the validation logic.

Why Traditional Migrations Fail#

The "Big Bang" approach fails because the business requirements have evolved past the original spec. The "Strangler Fig" pattern is better but still relies on manual discovery, which is prone to human error. Replay changes the paradigm by using the running application as the source of truth.

Moving to Micro-Frontends (MFE)#

For a massive insurance platform, a single React SPA (Single Page Application) is just a "modern monolith." The goal should be Micro-Frontends. This allows the Claims team to deploy updates independently of the Policy Admin team.

The Architectural Goal: Module Federation#

By breaking the monolith into MFEs, you achieve:

• •Independent Deployability: Fix a bug in the "Quote" flow without retesting the entire "User Profile" section.
• •Technology Agnostic: Run legacy parts alongside new React components.
• •Scalability: Scale only the high-traffic modules (e.g., the Customer Portal during open enrollment).

⚠️ Warning: Attempting to build micro-frontends without a unified Design System (Library) leads to "Franken-apps" where every button looks and behaves differently.

The Replay Workflow: From Video to React Components#

Instead of reading 100,000 lines of legacy Java or COBOL, Replay records a real user workflow. It captures the DOM changes, the network requests, and the state transitions. It then uses AI to reverse engineer these into clean, documented React components.

Step 1: Visual Recording#

A subject matter expert (SME) records a standard workflow, such as "Processing a Homeowners Insurance Claim." Replay captures every interaction, including hidden validation logic that only triggers under specific edge cases.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay's AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording and identifies UI patterns. It extracts these into a Library (Design System).

typescript
// Example: Replay-generated component from a legacy Claims form
// This captures the exact validation logic observed during the recording
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { TextField, Button, Alert } from '@/components/insurance-ui';

export const ClaimsSubmissionForm = ({ claimId, onComplete }) => {
  const [status, setStatus] = useState('pending');
  const [amount, setAmount] = useState(0);

  // Logic extracted from legacy XHR intercepts
  const validateClaimLimit = (val: number) => {
    return val <= 50000; // Policy limit discovered via Replay Flow analysis
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-6 border-l-4 border-blue-500">
      <h3>Claim ID: {claimId}</h3>
      <TextField 
        label="Claim Amount" 
        onChange={(e) => setAmount(Number(e.target.value))}
        error={!validateClaimLimit(amount)}
      />
      {amount > 50000 && <Alert type="warning">Requires Supervisor Approval</Alert>}
      <Button onClick={() => onComplete(amount)}>Submit to Underwriting</Button>
    </div>
  );
};

Step 3: API Contract Generation#

One of the biggest hurdles in insurance migration is the "Hidden API." Replay monitors the network layer during recording and generates OpenAPI (Swagger) contracts automatically.

yaml
# Generated by Replay from Legacy Traffic
/api/v1/claims/validate:
  post:
    summary: Validate Claim Amount
    parameters:
      - name: policy_id
        in: body
        required: true
        schema:
          type: string
    responses:
      '200':
        description: Validation successful
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              $ref: '#/components/schemas/ValidationResult'

💰 ROI Insight: Manual API documentation takes roughly 15 hours per endpoint. Replay generates these in seconds, saving an enterprise with 200 endpoints over 3,000 engineering hours.

Solving the "Black Box" Logic#

Insurance platforms are notorious for "Shadow Logic"—business rules that aren't documented but are critical for compliance. For example, a specific state-mandated disclosure that only appears if the policyholder is over 65 and lives in Florida.

Replay’s Flows feature maps these conditional paths visually. By seeing the "Video as source of truth," architects can see exactly when and why a component rendered, ensuring no compliance logic is lost during the move to React.

Step 4: Technical Debt Audit#

Before the final migration, Replay provides a Technical Debt Audit. It identifies:

• •Redundant components.
• •Dead code paths that users never actually trigger.
• •Security vulnerabilities in the legacy network layer.

📝 Note: In regulated industries like Insurance and Healthcare, Replay's SOC2 and HIPAA-ready status allows this extraction to happen on-premise, ensuring sensitive PII (Personally Identifiable Information) never leaves your firewall.

Case Study: Life Insurance Provider#

A Tier-1 Life Insurance provider had a 20-year-old underwriting portal. Their manual rewrite estimate was 22 months with a team of 15.

Using Replay:

1. •Discovery: Recorded 45 core workflows (2 weeks).
2. •Extraction: Generated 120 React components and 80 API contracts (1 week).
3. •Implementation: Built the Micro-Frontend shell and integrated the generated components (5 weeks).
4. •Total Time: 8 weeks.
5. •Savings: 70% reduction in total project timeline.

Implementation Details: The Micro-Frontend Shell#

When migrating, you need a container to host both the legacy screens (via iFrames or reverse proxies) and the new Replay-generated React components.

typescript
// Micro-Frontend Orchestrator Example
import { loadRemoteComponent } from '@replay/mfe-loader';

const InsurancePortal = () => {
  return (
    <div className="portal-container">
      <header>Insurance Enterprise Suite</header>
      <main>
        {/* Legacy Module (Still in Monolith) */}
        <LegacyModuleWrapper src="/old/policy-admin" />
        
        {/* Modernized Module (Extracted via Replay) */}
        <React.Suspense fallback={<Spinner />}>
          <NewClaimsModule claimId="CX-992" />
        </React.Suspense>
      </main>
    </div>
  );
};

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle complex business logic?#

Replay doesn't just look at the code; it looks at the execution. By recording the state changes and network traffic, Replay captures the "what" and the "how." The AI then maps these behaviors into functional React code. While complex backend calculations remain on the server, the frontend logic (validations, conditional rendering, state management) is extracted with 99% accuracy.

Is Replay safe for HIPAA/SOC2 regulated data?#

Yes. Replay is built for regulated environments. We offer On-Premise deployment options where the data never leaves your infrastructure. For cloud deployments, we provide PII masking tools that redact sensitive customer data from the recordings before they are processed for component extraction.

Can we use Replay for systems with no source code access?#

Absolutely. This is the core strength of Visual Reverse Engineering. Since Replay works by analyzing the rendered application and its network interactions, you don't need the original source code to document the system or extract the UI/UX logic.

How does this compare to low-code tools?#

Low-code tools often lock you into a proprietary ecosystem. Replay generates standard, high-quality React/TypeScript code that your developers own. There is no vendor lock-in. We provide the "blueprints" and the "bricks," but you own the house.

What is the learning curve for an Enterprise Architect?#

If you understand React and Micro-frontend architecture, you can use Replay. The platform is designed to augment your existing workflow, not replace it. Most architects are productive within 48 hours.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.