How Visual Reverse Engineering Solves the "Spaghetti Code" Problem

Your company is currently spending millions of dollars to pay "technical debt interest" on code that nobody actually understands. Every time a senior developer leaves, a piece of your institutional knowledge dies, leaving behind a "black box" of spaghetti code that your team is too terrified to touch.

The traditional response—the "Big Bang" rewrite—is a suicide mission. Statistics show that 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines, often stretching into 18-24 month marathons that yield zero ROI until the very end. The problem isn't your developers; it's the methodology. You are asking engineers to perform digital archaeology on undocumented systems when they should be building features.

TL;DR: Visual reverse engineering eliminates the "archaeology" phase of modernization by using real-time user workflows to automatically generate documented React components and API contracts, reducing migration time by 70%.

The $3.6 Trillion Spaghetti Code Crisis#

Global technical debt has ballooned to an estimated $3.6 trillion. For the average enterprise, this manifests as a "spaghetti code" problem: deeply intertwined dependencies, undocumented business logic, and UI layers that are inseparable from the backend.

When you decide to modernize, you typically start with a manual audit. This is where the bleeding starts. 67% of legacy systems lack any form of usable documentation. Your architects spend months "reading the tea leaves" of COBOL, Delphi, or ancient Java Server Pages (JSP) to figure out what the system actually does.

⚠️ Warning: Manual reverse engineering is the most expensive way to document a system. At an average of 40 hours per screen for manual extraction, a 100-screen enterprise application will cost you 4,000 engineering hours before you've written a single line of modern code.

Why "Reading the Code" is the Wrong Strategy#

Conventional wisdom says that to modernize a system, you must first read the source code. This is a fallacy. In a legacy environment, the source code is often a lie. It contains dead paths, deprecated logic, and "temporary" fixes that have lived for a decade.

The only "source of truth" that matters is the observed behavior of the system during a user workflow. This is where Replay changes the economics of modernization. Instead of digging through the backend, you record the frontend.

Comparison of Modernization Strategies#

Visual Reverse Engineering: How It Works#

Visual reverse engineering flips the script. By recording a real user performing a task—like processing an insurance claim or executing a trade—Replay captures the state transitions, API calls, and UI components in real-time.

It transforms a video of a legacy screen into a documented, modular React component. This isn't just a "screenshot-to-code" gimmick; it’s a deep extraction of the business logic embedded in the UI.

Step 1: Workflow Recording#

An analyst or subject matter expert (SME) performs a standard business process in the legacy application while Replay records the session. This captures every interaction, network request, and DOM change.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording to identify patterns. It separates the "spaghetti" into clean, reusable React components. It identifies what is a button, what is a data grid, and what is a complex validation rule.

Step 3: API Contract Generation#

While extracting the UI, Replay maps the data flow. It generates Swagger/OpenAPI specifications based on the actual traffic observed during the recording, solving the "undocumented API" problem instantly.

Step 4: Technical Debt Audit#

The platform provides a blueprint of the existing architecture, highlighting where logic is duplicated and where the "spaghetti" is most tangled.

💰 ROI Insight: Using Replay, the time spent per screen drops from 40 hours of manual labor to just 4 hours of automated extraction and refinement. That is a 90% reduction in the most tedious phase of modernization.

From Black Box to React: A Practical Example#

When Replay extracts a legacy form, it doesn't just copy the HTML. It generates functional, type-safe TypeScript code that preserves the original business intent while adhering to modern standards.

typescript
// Example: Legacy Insurance Claim Form Migrated via Replay
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, TextField, Alert } from '@/components/ui'; // From your Replay Library

interface ClaimData {
  policyNumber: string;
  incidentDate: string;
  claimAmount: number;
}

export const ModernizedClaimForm = ({ initialData }: { initialData?: ClaimData }) => {
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState<ClaimData>(initialData || {
    policyNumber: '',
    incidentDate: '',
    claimAmount: 0,
  });

  // Replay automatically extracted this validation logic from the legacy recording
  const validatePolicy = (num: string) => {
    return /^[A-Z]{2}-\d{6}$/.test(num);
  };

  const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => {
    e.preventDefault();
    if (!validatePolicy(formData.policyNumber)) {
      console.error("Legacy Validation Failed: Policy format invalid.");
      return;
    }
    // API Contract generated by Replay based on recorded network traffic
    await fetch('/api/v1/claims/submit', {
      method: 'POST',
      body: JSON.stringify(formData),
    });
  };

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit} className="space-y-4 p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow">
      <TextField 
        label="Policy Number" 
        value={formData.policyNumber} 
        onChange={(v) => setFormData({...formData, policyNumber: v})} 
      />
      {/* Additional fields extracted from legacy UI structure */}
      <Button type="submit">Submit Claim</Button>
    </form>
  );
};

Solving the Documentation Gap#

The greatest risk in any modernization project is the "hidden requirement"—the weird edge case that was hard-coded into the system in 2014 and forgotten. Manual documentation misses these 67% of the time.

Replay acts as a "living document." Because the source of truth is a recording of the actual system in use, the documentation is inherently accurate. It generates:

• •E2E Test Suites: Automatically creates Playwright or Cypress tests that mirror the recorded workflow.
• •Visual Blueprints: A map of how users actually navigate the "spaghetti," not how the original (and now incorrect) flowcharts say they do.
• •Design System Mapping: Identifies recurring UI patterns to help you build a unified Design System (via Replay’s Library feature).

💡 Pro Tip: Don't try to modernize everything at once. Use Replay to identify the "High Value, High Debt" screens. Extract those first to show immediate ROI to stakeholders.

Built for Regulated Environments#

We understand that for Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" is often a non-starter. Spaghetti code in these industries is often wrapped in layers of compliance requirements.

Replay is built with these constraints in mind:

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data handling that meets the highest security standards.
• •On-Premise Availability: Keep your legacy source code and recordings within your own firewall.
• •PII Masking: Automatically redact sensitive data during the recording and extraction process.

The Future Isn't Rewriting—It's Understanding#

The "Big Bang" rewrite is a relic of an era when we had more time and less complexity. In the modern enterprise, you cannot afford to stop the world for two years to fix your technical debt.

Visual reverse engineering with Replay allows you to modernize incrementally, with surgical precision. You aren't guessing what the code does; you are seeing what it does and capturing it in a modern stack. This is how you turn an 18-month project into a 18-day sprint.

typescript
// Replay-Generated API Contract (Swagger/OpenAPI snippet)
// Extracted from legacy 'ProcessOrder.do' endpoint
{
  "path": "/api/v1/orders/process",
  "method": "post",
  "summary": "Extracted from Legacy Order System",
  "parameters": [
    { "name": "orderId", "in": "body", "required": true, "type": "string" },
    { "name": "priorityCode", "in": "body", "schema": { "type": "integer", "enum": [1, 2, 3] } }
  ],
  "responses": {
    "200": { "description": "Order processed successfully" }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual audit of a complex enterprise screen can take 40+ hours of developer time, Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours. Most organizations see a full end-to-end extraction of a core workflow (5-10 screens) within a single business week.

What about business logic preservation?#

Replay captures the effects of business logic—the API calls, the state changes, and the UI responses. By generating API contracts and React state logic based on these observations, Replay ensures that the "intent" of the legacy system is preserved without carrying over the "rot" of the original implementation.

Does Replay require access to my legacy source code?#

No. Replay performs Visual Reverse Engineering. It works by observing the application at runtime. This is particularly valuable for systems where the original source code is lost, uncompilable, or written in languages your current team doesn't support.

Is the generated code "clean"?#

Yes. Unlike "low-code" platforms that output unreadable "blobs," Replay generates standard, human-readable TypeScript and React code that follows your organization's linting and architectural rules. It is designed to be checked into your Git repository and maintained by your developers.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.