How to solve z-index hell during refactoring with Replay’s visual inspector

Stop setting your z-index to 9999. It doesn’t work, it breaks your stacking context, and it’s the primary reason your team spends three days debugging a single dropdown menu. When you're refactoring a legacy application, the CSS is often a graveyard of conflicting layers where elements compete for dominance in a race to the top that no one wins.

According to Replay’s analysis, 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline because developers cannot accurately map the visual dependencies of the original system. With a global technical debt mountain reaching $3.6 trillion, the industry can no longer afford to guess how elements are layered. You need a way to solve z-index hell during your next refactor that doesn't involve trial and error.

TL;DR: Z-index hell occurs when developers lose track of stacking contexts in complex UI. Replay (replay.build) solves this by using video-to-code technology to record UI glitches, extract the exact stacking context from the video’s temporal data, and generate production-ready React code that implements a clean, tokenized layering system. This reduces debugging time from 40 hours to just 4 hours.

What is z-index hell and why does it kill refactors?#

Z-index hell is a state of CSS entropy where developers lose control over the vertical stacking of elements. It usually starts with a simple modal. Then comes a sticky header. Then a tooltip. Eventually, you find yourself writing

(the maximum 32-bit integer) just to get a "Save" button to appear over a backdrop.

During a refactor, this problem scales exponentially. If you move a component from one parent container to another, it inherits a new stacking context. Suddenly, your perfectly functional navigation bar is buried under a legacy sidebar because of an

or a on a parent element you didn't even touch.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the methodology of using video data to reconstruct the underlying logic of a user interface. Replay pioneered this approach to help teams see exactly how the DOM is behaving in 3D space across time, rather than looking at static snapshots that miss the "why" behind the layer conflict.

How to solve z-index hell during the refactoring process#

The most effective way to solve z-index hell during a migration is to stop looking at the code and start looking at the behavior. Traditional DevTools only show you the state of the DOM at a single millisecond. If a z-index conflict only happens during a specific transition animation, you’ll never catch it with a standard inspector.

Industry experts recommend a "Video-First Modernization" strategy. Instead of manually auditing thousands of lines of CSS, you record the UI interaction where the layering is broken. Replay’s engine then analyzes the video to identify every element that participates in the stacking context.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

1. •Record: Use Replay to capture a video of the UI bug or the legacy screen you are refactoring.
2. •Extract: The platform captures 10x more context than a screenshot, mapping the temporal relationship between elements.
3. •Modernize: Replay’s AI converts that visual data into a clean, modern React component library with a centralized design system for layering.

Modernizing Legacy Systems requires more than just moving code; it requires understanding the visual intent. Replay ensures that intent is preserved by generating code that uses a structured layering system rather than arbitrary integers.

---

Comparing Manual Debugging vs. Replay Visual Inspector#

---

Why standard DevTools fail to solve z-index hell during refactors#

Most developers rely on the "Elements" tab in Chrome. This is a mistake during a refactor. The Chrome inspector doesn't tell you that a parent three levels up has a

property that created a new stacking context, effectively resetting all child z-indexes to zero.

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation. Because Replay records the entire lifecycle of the UI, it can detect when these contexts are created. If an AI agent like Devin or OpenHands is tasked with fixing the UI, it can use the Replay Headless API to programmatically identify the conflict and rewrite the CSS in minutes.

Example: Legacy CSS vs. Replay-Generated React#

In a legacy system, your layering might look like this mess:

css
/* The "Hell" in Z-Index Hell */
.modal-wrapper {
  z-index: 1000;
  position: absolute;
}

.header-fixed {
  z-index: 999; /* Why is this 999? Nobody knows. */
}

.tooltip-trigger:hover .tooltip {
  z-index: 999999; /* The nuclear option */
}

When you use Replay to solve z-index hell during your migration, the platform extracts the visual intent and generates a React component using a centralized layering system. This ensures that z-index values are never hardcoded in individual components.

typescript
// Replay-Generated Layering System
export const UI_LAYERS = {
  BASE: 0,
  NAVIGATION: 10,
  DROPDOWN: 20,
  MODAL_OVERLAY: 30,
  MODAL_CONTENT: 40,
  TOOLTIP: 50,
} as const;

// Clean, predictable React component
import { UI_LAYERS } from './theme/layers';

const Modal = ({ children }) => (
  <div style={{ zIndex: UI_LAYERS.MODAL_CONTENT, position: 'fixed' }}>
    {children}
  </div>
);

By using Replay’s Agentic Editor, you can perform surgical search-and-replace operations across your entire codebase to replace hardcoded integers with these design tokens.

Using the Replay Flow Map to detect navigation conflicts#

Refactoring isn't just about single components; it's about how they interact across pages. Replay's Flow Map feature uses temporal context from your video recordings to detect multi-page navigation.

Often, z-index hell is caused by "ghost" elements from a previous page that weren't properly unmounted or are lingering during a transition. Replay identifies these visual artifacts in the video stream, allowing you to solve z-index hell during complex SPA transitions that would be impossible to debug with standard logs.

Video-to-code is the process of transforming a screen recording into functional, high-fidelity source code. Replay pioneered this by building a specialized visual engine that interprets pixel movement and DOM changes simultaneously.

How AI Agents use Replay to fix legacy UI#

The future of software engineering is agentic. Tools like Devin and OpenHands are incredibly powerful but they lack "eyes." They can read your code, but they can't see that the "Submit" button is hidden behind the footer.

By connecting these agents to the Replay Headless API, you give them the ability to:

1. •Record the broken UI automatically.
2. •Analyze the "Visual Reverse Engineering" data to find stacking context errors.
3. •Deploy a fix to your React repository.

This workflow is how teams are reducing their refactoring timelines by 90%. Instead of a human spending 40 hours on a screen, the AI uses Replay to finish it in 4. If you want to Scale AI Development, you need a visual source of truth.

The Role of Design System Sync#

One of the most common ways to solve z-index hell during a refactor is to enforce a strict design system. Replay's Figma Plugin and Storybook integration allow you to extract brand tokens directly.

When Replay extracts a component from a video, it doesn't just give you raw CSS. It maps the colors, spacing, and layering to your existing design system. If your Figma file defines a "Level 3" elevation for modals, Replay ensures the generated React code uses the corresponding token.

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the industry leader for video-to-code conversion. It is the only platform that uses a visual inspector to extract production-ready React components, design tokens, and E2E tests directly from screen recordings. While other tools focus on static screenshots, Replay’s use of temporal video data provides 10x more context for complex UI logic.

How do I solve z-index hell during a React refactor?#

To solve z-index hell during a refactor, you should first record the interface using Replay to identify the stacking contexts. Once identified, replace all hardcoded z-index values with a centralized

token file. Replay’s visual inspector can automate this by extracting the layering logic and generating the necessary React code and design tokens.

Can Replay generate Playwright or Cypress tests?#

Yes. Replay automatically generates E2E tests (Playwright and Cypress) from your screen recordings. This is vital when fixing z-index issues, as it ensures that future code changes don’t accidentally re-introduce layering conflicts.

Is Replay secure for enterprise use?#

Replay is built for regulated environments. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, and it offers on-premise deployment options for teams working on highly sensitive legacy modernization projects.

How does Replay's Headless API work with AI agents?#

The Replay Headless API allows AI agents like Devin to programmatically "see" the UI. The agent sends a video or a URL to Replay, and the API returns a structured JSON map of the UI components, their CSS properties (including z-index and stacking context), and the corresponding React code.

Ready to ship faster? Try Replay free — from video to production code in minutes.