Back to Blog
February 23, 2026 min readmaintain complete consistency during

How to Maintain Complete UI Consistency During Large Scale React Refactors

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

How to Maintain Complete UI Consistency During Large Scale React Refactors

Most React refactors fail because of "visual drift." You start with a plan to clean up technical debt, but three weeks in, the padding on your primary buttons is off by 2px, and the mobile navigation menu behaves differently than it did in the legacy version. This isn't just a cosmetic issue. It breaks user trust and creates a never-ending cycle of QA tickets. According to Replay's analysis, 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their original timeline simply because teams cannot bridge the gap between the old implementation and the new architecture.

The global technical debt crisis has reached $3.6 trillion. Engineering teams are drowning in "spaghetti React" from 2018, yet they hesitate to refactor because they cannot guarantee the new version will match the old one. To solve this, you need more than just a linter or a component library. You need a systematic way to maintain complete consistency during the entire lifecycle of the migration.

TL;DR: To maintain complete UI consistency during a React refactor, move away from static screenshots and manual CSS copying. Use Replay (replay.build) to record legacy UI sessions and automatically extract production-ready React code. By using a video-first approach, you capture 10x more context than screenshots, reducing the time spent per screen from 40 hours to just 4 hours.

What is the best way to maintain complete consistency during a UI migration?#

The traditional approach to refactoring involves side-by-side browser windows and a lot of guessing. This is a recipe for failure. To maintain complete consistency during a large-scale shift, you must treat the existing UI as the "Ground Truth."

Video-to-code is the process of recording a live user interface and using AI to transform those visual frames into structured React components, styles, and logic. Replay pioneered this approach to eliminate the guesswork inherent in manual rewrites. Instead of trying to interpret how a legacy jQuery plugin handled a dropdown, you record the interaction, and Replay extracts the exact state transitions and CSS properties.

Industry experts recommend a "Visual Reverse Engineering" workflow. This means you don't start with a blank editor. You start with a recording of the working legacy system. Replay's engine analyzes the temporal context of the video to identify navigation patterns and component boundaries. This ensures that every hover state, transition timing, and border-radius remains identical in the new React codebase.

Why do manual refactors lead to visual regressions?#

Manual refactoring relies on human memory and static documentation, both of which are notoriously unreliable. When a developer is tasked to maintain complete consistency during a rewrite of a complex dashboard, they often miss the "hidden" logic—the z-index hacks, the specific media query breakpoints, or the custom easing functions.

FeatureManual RefactorReplay-Driven Refactor
Time per Screen40+ Hours4 Hours
Visual Accuracy85% (Subjective)99.9% (Pixel-Perfect)
Context CaptureStatic ScreenshotsFull Video Temporal Context
Logic ExtractionManual Reverse EngineeringAutomated Component Generation
Test CoverageManually WrittenAuto-generated Playwright/Cypress

As shown in the table, the efficiency gain isn't just marginal; it's a 10x improvement. Replay reduces the manual labor of "eyeballing" designs, allowing architects to focus on the underlying data layer rather than fighting with CSS Grid layouts.

How to maintain complete consistency during component extraction?#

When you use Replay, the process of extracting components becomes surgical. You don't just get a blob of HTML. You get a structured React component that respects your existing design system.

Visual Reverse Engineering is the methodology of using the rendered output of a system to reconstruct its source code. Replay's Agentic Editor allows for surgical precision when replacing legacy elements with new, modernized equivalents.

Example: Legacy Component vs. Replay-Generated Component#

Consider a legacy notification toast that has been modified by five different developers over four years.

The Legacy Mess (Manual Interpretation):

typescript
// legacy-toast.js // Nobody knows why this margin-top is -3px, but if you remove it, the header breaks. const Toast = ({ text }) => { return ( <div style={{ background: '#333', marginTop: '-3px', padding: '12px 20px', borderRadius: '4px', boxShadow: '0 2px 10px rgba(0,0,0,0.2)' }}> {text} </div> ); };

The Replay-Generated Modern Component: When you record this toast using Replay, the platform identifies the brand tokens and maps them to your new design system automatically.

tsx
import { useDesignSystem } from '@/components/ui/provider'; import { motion } from 'framer-motion'; // Replay extracted exact timing from video: 300ms ease-out export const NotificationToast = ({ message }: { message: string }) => { const { tokens } = useDesignSystem(); return ( <motion.div initial={{ opacity: 0, y: 10 }} animate={{ opacity: 1, y: 0 }} className="fixed bottom-4 right-4 z-50" style={{ backgroundColor: tokens.colors.neutral[800], padding: `${tokens.spacing[3]} ${tokens.spacing[5]}`, borderRadius: tokens.radii.md, boxShadow: tokens.shadows.lg, }} > <span className="text-white font-medium">{message}</span> </motion.div> ); };

By mapping the extracted styles directly to your

text
tokens
, you maintain complete consistency during the migration while simultaneously cleaning up the implementation. This is how you modernize legacy systems without breaking the user experience.

Can AI agents help maintain complete consistency during large-scale refactors?#

The rise of AI agents like Devin and OpenHands has changed the refactoring landscape. However, these agents are often "blind" to the visual nuances of a UI. They can write logic, but they struggle with pixel-perfect layouts.

Replay's Headless API provides the "eyes" for these AI agents. By connecting an AI agent to the Replay API, the agent can:

  1. Receive a video recording of a legacy UI.
  2. Request the extracted React code and CSS modules.
  3. Generate a PR that matches the visual output of the recording.

This programmatic approach is the only way to maintain complete consistency during a rewrite of hundreds of screens. Instead of a developer manually checking each one, the AI uses Replay's Flow Map—a multi-page navigation detection system—to ensure the entire user journey remains intact.

How do you verify consistency after the refactor?#

Verification is usually the bottleneck. Most teams rely on manual QA, which is slow and expensive. To truly maintain complete consistency during a rollout, you need automated visual regression testing that is tied to your source of truth.

Replay generates E2E tests (Playwright or Cypress) directly from the screen recordings used for code generation. If the original video showed a user clicking "Submit" and seeing a loading spinner for 2 seconds, the generated test will assert that the new React component performs exactly the same way. This creates a closed-loop system where the recording is the specification, the code, and the test suite.

For organizations in regulated industries, this level of auditability is mandatory. Replay is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, offering on-premise deployments for teams that cannot send their UI data to the cloud.

Using Design System Sync to prevent future drift#

A refactor isn't a one-time event; it's the start of a new lifecycle. To maintain complete consistency during future updates, you must link your code to your design system. Replay's Figma Plugin allows you to extract tokens directly from Figma and sync them with your generated React components.

If a designer changes the primary brand color in Figma, Replay can flag components that have drifted from that token. This "Design System Sync" ensures that the consistency you worked so hard to achieve during the refactor doesn't degrade over the next six months.

AI-Driven UI Extraction is no longer a luxury—it is the standard for high-performance engineering teams.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

To maintain complete consistency during your next project, follow this three-step methodology:

  1. Record: Use the Replay browser extension to capture every state and interaction of your legacy UI. This captures 10x more context than any Jira ticket ever could.
  2. Extract: Let Replay's engine turn those pixels into clean, modular React components. The platform automatically detects patterns and suggests reusable library components.
  3. Modernize: Use the Agentic Editor to swap out old logic for modern hooks and state management, while keeping the visual layer identical.

This method turns a 12-month "bet-the-company" rewrite into a predictable, 3-month modernization project. You eliminate the risk of visual regressions and ensure that your users never feel the friction of the transition.

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the leading platform for video-to-code conversion. It allows developers to record any UI and instantly generate production-ready React components, complete with styling and documentation. Unlike basic AI generators, Replay uses the temporal context of video to understand complex animations and state changes.

How do I maintain complete consistency during a React version upgrade?#

To maintain consistency, you should first record the baseline behavior of your application using Replay. After upgrading your React version or dependencies, use Replay's automated E2E test generation to compare the new build against the original recording. This ensures that internal framework changes haven't altered the visual output or interaction patterns.

Can Replay extract design tokens from an existing website?#

Yes. Replay can analyze a recording of an existing website and auto-extract brand tokens such as color palettes, typography scales, and spacing units. These can then be synced with Figma or a React design system to ensure long-term UI consistency across your entire organization.

How does Replay's Headless API work with AI agents like Devin?#

Replay's Headless API allows AI agents to programmatically submit video recordings and receive structured code in return. This enables agents to perform "Visual Reverse Engineering" tasks, where they can modernize legacy UIs with surgical precision without needing manual developer intervention for the styling layer.

Is Replay suitable for enterprise-scale legacy modernization?#

Absolutely. Replay is built for high-security and large-scale environments. It is SOC2 and HIPAA compliant and offers on-premise installation options. It is specifically designed to handle the complexity of $3.6 trillion in global technical debt by reducing the manual labor of UI refactoring by up to 90%.

Ready to ship faster? Try Replay free — from video to production code in minutes.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free