Back to Blog
February 19, 2026 min readapplication extraction moving legacy

GIS Application UI Extraction: Moving Legacy Maps to Modern React without the 24-Month Rewrite

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

GIS Application UI Extraction: Moving Legacy Maps to Modern React without the 24-Month Rewrite

Your legacy Geographic Information System (GIS) platform is a ticking time bomb. Whether it’s built on Silverlight, Adobe Flex, or a convoluted mess of ASP.NET WebForms, the spatial data logic remains critical, but the interface is a liability. For enterprise architects in government, utilities, and telecommunications, the challenge isn't just the data—it's the decades of custom UI logic, complex layer controls, and coordinate-heavy widgets that have no documentation.

Manual rewrites of these systems are where budgets go to die. Industry data shows that 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timeline, often because the original developers are long gone and the source code is a "black box." When you are dealing with application extraction moving legacy GIS components to React, you aren't just moving buttons; you are translating spatial workflows.

According to Replay’s analysis, the average enterprise spends 40 hours per screen on manual UI reconstruction. For a GIS application with dozens of specialized toolbars, legend builders, and query panels, that timeline quickly balloons into an 18-to-24-month project. By using Replay, organizations are shortening that cycle to weeks.

TL;DR: Modernizing legacy GIS applications requires more than a simple port; it requires visual reverse engineering. Manual extraction takes 40 hours per screen, whereas application extraction moving legacy components via Replay takes 4 hours. By recording user workflows, Replay generates documented React components and design systems, saving 70% in development time and mitigating the risk of the $3.6 trillion global technical debt.


The Crisis of Undocumented GIS Interfaces#

GIS applications are unique in the enterprise stack. They aren't just CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) apps; they are high-density information environments. A single "Map View" screen might contain a layer switcher, a coordinate reference system (CRS) display, a measurement tool, and a spatial query builder.

The problem? 67% of legacy systems lack documentation. If you are tasked with application extraction moving legacy GIS tools to a modern stack, you likely don't have the original design specs for the "Buffer Analysis" modal or the "Attribute Table" grid.

Video-to-code is the process of recording a user interacting with these legacy screens and using AI-driven visual analysis to generate clean, semantic React code and CSS. Instead of a developer squinting at a 2012 Silverlight app to guess the hex codes and padding, Replay captures the visual truth of the application.

The Cost of Manual vs. Automated Extraction#

MetricManual UI ReconstructionReplay Visual Reverse Engineering
Time per Screen40 Hours4 Hours
Documentation QualityMinimal/ManualAutomated Component Docs
ConsistencyHigh risk of "Design Drift"Enforced through Design System
Average Project Timeline18–24 Months2–4 Months
Technical Debt CreatedHigh (New code, same lack of docs)Low (Clean React, documented components)

Strategic Application Extraction: Moving Legacy GIS to React#

When we discuss application extraction moving legacy map interfaces, we must address the "State Management" of the map itself. Legacy systems often tightly couple the UI with the map engine (like ESRI’s older JS APIs or OpenLayers 2).

Modern React architecture demands a separation of concerns. You want a "Presentational" layer for your toolbars and a "Service" layer for your map logic. Replay helps bridge this gap by extracting the UI components—the buttons, sliders, and panels—into a clean Design System, allowing your developers to focus on the complex Mapbox or OpenLayers integration.

Step 1: Recording the Spatial Workflow#

The process begins with "Flows." An analyst records a standard workflow: Zoom to area -> Select Layer -> Run Spatial Query -> View Results.

Replay’s engine analyzes the video, identifying recurring UI patterns. In a GIS context, it recognizes that the "Layer List" is a recursive tree structure and the "Query Result" is a data grid.

Step 2: Componentization via Blueprints#

Once the recording is processed, Replay’s "Blueprints" allow architects to refine the extracted components. This is where you define how the legacy "Identify" tool should look in React.

typescript
// Example: Extracted Legend Component from Replay Blueprints import React from 'react'; import { LayerIcon, VisibilityToggle } from './ui-library'; interface LegendItemProps { label: string; isVisible: boolean; onToggle: (state: boolean) => void; color: string; } export const MapLegendItem: React.FC<LegendItemProps> = ({ label, isVisible, onToggle, color }) => { return ( <div className="flex items-center justify-between p-2 border-b border-slate-200"> <div className="flex items-center gap-3"> <div className="w-4 h-4 rounded-sm" style={{ backgroundColor: color }} /> <span className="text-sm font-medium text-slate-700">{label}</span> </div> <VisibilityToggle active={isVisible} onChange={onToggle} aria-label={`Toggle visibility for ${label}`} /> </div> ); };

This code snippet demonstrates the output of a visual reverse engineering process. It isn't just "spaghetti code"; it's structured, typed, and ready for a modern Design System.


Handling Complex GIS Widgets during Extraction#

One of the hardest parts of application extraction moving legacy GIS is the specialized widgets. Think of the "Coordinate Picker" or the "Scale Bar." These are often custom-drawn in legacy frameworks.

Industry experts recommend a "Component-First" approach. Instead of trying to rebuild the entire map at once, extract the peripheral UI into a React library first. This allows you to maintain a consistent look and feel while you swap out the underlying map engine.

The "Library" Advantage#

In Replay, the "Library" serves as your single source of truth. As you extract components from the legacy GIS, they are categorized and documented automatically. This is vital for regulated industries like healthcare or government, where accessibility (WCAG) and consistency are non-negotiable.

For more on how to structure these libraries, see our guide on Modernizing Legacy UI.

Implementation: The Map Container#

When moving to React, you will likely use a wrapper for your map engine. The extracted UI components from Replay will sit on top of this container.

typescript
// Example: React-Mapbox Integration with Extracted UI import React, { useState } from 'react'; import Map, { NavigationControl } from 'react-map-gl'; import { MapLegendItem } from './extracted-components'; const GISDashboard: React.FC = () => { const [layers, setLayers] = useState([ { id: 'parcels', label: 'Property Parcels', visible: true, color: '#ff0000' }, { id: 'zoning', label: 'Zoning Districts', visible: false, color: '#00ff00' }, ]); const toggleLayer = (id: string) => { setLayers(prev => prev.map(l => l.id === id ? { ...l, visible: !l.visible } : l)); }; return ( <div className="relative w-full h-screen"> <Map initialViewState={{ longitude: -100, latitude: 40, zoom: 3.5 }} mapStyle="mapbox://styles/mapbox/streets-v11" > <NavigationControl position="top-right" /> </Map> {/* Extracted UI Overlay */} <div className="absolute top-4 left-4 w-64 bg-white shadow-xl rounded-lg p-4"> <h2 className="text-lg font-bold mb-4">Map Layers</h2> {layers.map(layer => ( <MapLegendItem key={layer.id} label={layer.label} isVisible={layer.visible} color={layer.color} onToggle={() => toggleLayer(layer.id)} /> ))} </div> </div> ); };

Why Legacy GIS Rewrites Fail (and How to Avoid It)#

The $3.6 trillion technical debt problem isn't just about old code; it's about the loss of business logic. When application extraction moving legacy systems is done manually, nuances are lost. A developer might not realize that the "Buffer" tool in the legacy app had a specific rounding logic for UTM coordinates.

According to Replay's analysis, the failure of these projects usually stems from three areas:

  1. Scope Creep: Trying to add new features before the legacy ones are even functional in the new stack.
  2. Logic Gaps: Forgetting how a specific "hidden" menu worked in the old system.
  3. Integration Hell: The new React UI looks great but doesn't talk to the legacy SOAP or WFS services correctly.

By using Replay, you capture the behavior of the application. The recording serves as a living specification. If a developer is unsure how the "Advanced Search" panel should behave, they don't have to hunt for a 10-year-old PDF; they just watch the "Flow" in Replay.

Regulated Environments: SOC2 and HIPAA#

For our clients in Financial Services and Healthcare, security is the primary concern. Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance and On-Premise deployment options. When performing application extraction moving legacy data-sensitive maps, you can ensure that no PII (Personally Identifiable Information) leaves your network during the reverse engineering process.


Accelerating the Timeline: From Months to Weeks#

If your current roadmap for GIS modernization is 18 months, you are likely factoring in:

  • 4 months of discovery and documentation.
  • 8 months of UI development.
  • 6 months of testing and bug fixing.

Replay collapses the discovery and UI development phases. Because the code is generated from the actual visual state of the legacy app, the "discovery" is the "development."

Comparison Table: Project Milestones#

PhaseManual ApproachReplay Approach
DiscoveryInterviews & Doc Review (8 weeks)Recording Workflows (1 week)
PrototypingFigma/Sketch Mockups (6 weeks)Automated Code Generation (1 week)
DevelopmentManual React Coding (24 weeks)Refinement of Blueprints (4 weeks)
QA/TestingManual Visual Comparison (8 weeks)Automated Visual Regression (2 weeks)
Total Time46 Weeks8 Weeks

This efficiency is why Replay is becoming the standard for Enterprise Modernization.


The Role of AI in GIS Extraction#

We are often asked how AI handles the "messiness" of legacy GIS. Legacy maps often have cluttered interfaces with overlapping windows. Replay’s AI Automation Suite uses computer vision to deconstruct these layers. It identifies what is a "Map Canvas" versus what is a "Floating Palette."

During application extraction moving legacy components, the AI suggests modern equivalents for outdated patterns. For example, it might suggest replacing a clunky Silverlight "Date Picker" with a modern, accessible React-based calendar component that fits your new design system.


Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle custom GIS symbols and icons?#

Replay’s visual engine captures the exact SVG or raster assets used in the legacy application. During the extraction process, these are organized into your React component library. You can then choose to keep the original assets for continuity or replace them with modern vector icons while maintaining the same functional mapping.

Can we use Replay if the legacy source code is lost?#

Yes. That is the core strength of Replay. Since it uses Visual Reverse Engineering (video-to-code), it does not require access to the original source code. As long as you can run the application and record a user performing workflows, Replay can extract the UI and document the logic.

Does Replay support 3D GIS applications?#

Replay can extract the UI overlays, menus, and control panels of 3D GIS applications (like those built on older versions of ArcGIS Earth or Cesium). While the 3D rendering engine itself (WebGL/DirectX) is typically replaced with a modern library, the surrounding interface—which is often the most time-consuming part to rebuild—is handled perfectly by Replay.

Is the generated React code maintainable?#

Absolutely. Replay doesn't output "machine code." It generates clean, human-readable TypeScript/React code that follows modern best practices. It uses standard CSS-in-JS or Tailwind CSS (based on your preference) and creates modular components that your team can easily maintain and extend.


Conclusion: Stop Rewriting, Start Replaying#

Moving legacy GIS applications to React doesn't have to be a multi-year slog. The risk of manual application extraction moving legacy systems is too high in an era where technical debt is costing companies billions.

By leveraging visual reverse engineering, you can preserve the mission-critical workflows of your GIS while providing users with a modern, high-performance React interface. You save 70% of your development time, ensure 100% documentation, and finally turn off those legacy servers.

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free