From Lotus Notes to Modern Web: A Content and UI Migration Strategy

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis has a graveyard, and its headstone is often engraved with the IBM Lotus Notes logo. For decades, Lotus Notes (now HCL Domino) was the gold standard for rapid application development. Today, it is a high-risk "black box" that holds critical business logic hostage within proprietary NSF files and archaic LotusScript.

The traditional approach to migrating from Lotus Notes is a binary choice: a "Big Bang" rewrite that has a 70% chance of failure or a slow manual extraction that takes 40 hours per screen. Neither is acceptable for the modern enterprise.

The future of legacy modernization isn't archaeology—it’s visual reverse engineering. By using Replay, organizations are moving from Lotus Notes to modern React-based architectures in weeks rather than years, achieving a 70% average time savings.

TL;DR: Modernizing from Lotus Notes fails when teams treat it as a data migration; success requires visual reverse engineering to capture undocumented business logic and UI patterns directly into modern React components.

The Lotus Notes Modernization Trap#

Most CTOs underestimate the complexity of moving from Lotus Notes because they view it as a simple database migration. It isn't. Lotus Notes is an integrated ecosystem where data, UI, and logic are tightly coupled.

The "Archaeology" problem is real: 67% of these legacy systems lack any form of current documentation. When the original developers have long since retired, the codebase becomes a "black box." Attempting to manually document every @Formula and LotusScript agent before writing a single line of modern code is why the average enterprise rewrite timeline stretches to 18-24 months.

The Cost of Manual Extraction vs. Replay#

Why "Big Bang" Rewrites Fail Lotus Notes Migrations#

The "Big Bang" approach fails because it assumes you can freeze the business while you spend two years rebuilding. In regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare, the business logic embedded in Lotus Notes is often the result of 20 years of edge-case handling.

When you rewrite from scratch, you miss these edge cases. You end up with a modern UI that lacks the functional depth of the legacy system, leading to user rejection and expensive post-launch fixes.

⚠️ Warning: Never attempt a "lift and shift" of Lotus Notes logic. The flat-file nature of NSF databases does not map 1:1 to relational SQL or NoSQL structures without significant architectural refactoring.

A New Strategy: Visual Reverse Engineering#

Instead of digging through 20-year-old LotusScript, Replay allows architects to use "Video as the Source of Truth." By recording a real user performing a workflow in the legacy Lotus Notes client, Replay’s AI Automation Suite extracts the UI components, state changes, and underlying API requirements.

This shifts the focus from "What does the code say?" to "What does the system actually do?"

Step 1: Workflow Recording#

A business analyst or power user records the standard operating procedures within the Lotus Notes environment. Replay captures every click, field validation, and hidden sub-form.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay’s engine analyzes the recording and generates documented React components. It doesn't just copy pixels; it understands the intent of the UI.

Step 3: API Contract Generation#

Because Replay sees the data entering and leaving the UI, it automatically generates API contracts. This allows your backend team to build the necessary microservices in parallel with the frontend development.

Step 4: Technical Debt Audit#

Replay provides an automated audit of the legacy screen, identifying redundant fields and obsolete workflows that shouldn't be migrated to the modern web.

💰 ROI Insight: Organizations using Replay reduce their "Time to First Byte" for modernized applications by 80%, moving from conceptual design to a functional React prototype in days.

Technical Implementation: From NSF to React#

When migrating from Lotus Notes, the goal is to move toward a headless architecture. You want a clean separation between your React frontend and your modern backend (Node.js, .NET, or Java).

Here is an example of a React component generated by Replay after analyzing a legacy Lotus Notes "Insurance Claims" form:

typescript
// Generated by Replay Visual Reverse Engineering
// Source: Lotus Notes Claims_v3_Final.nsf
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, Input, Card, Alert } from '@/components/ui';

interface ClaimData {
  claimId: string;
  policyNumber: string;
  incidentDate: string;
  status: 'Draft' | 'Submitted' | 'UnderReview';
}

export const ModernizedClaimForm: React.FC<{ id?: string }> = ({ id }) => {
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState<Partial<ClaimData>>({});
  const [isValidationAlertOpen, setValidationAlertOpen] = useState(false);

  // Replay identified this business logic from the legacy @Formula:
  // @If(IncidentDate > @Today; @Failure("Date cannot be in the future"); @Success)
  const validateIncidentDate = (date: string) => {
    return new Date(date) <= new Date();
  };

  const handleSubmit = async () => {
    if (!validateIncidentDate(formData.incidentDate || '')) {
      setValidationAlertOpen(true);
      return;
    }
    // API Contract generated by Replay
    await fetch('/api/v1/claims', {
      method: 'POST',
      body: JSON.stringify(formData),
    });
  };

  return (
    <Card className="p-6">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">Claim Submission</h2>
      {isValidationAlertOpen && (
        <Alert variant="destructive">Incident date cannot be in the future.</Alert>
      )}
      <div className="space-y-4">
        <Input 
          label="Policy Number" 
          value={formData.policyNumber} 
          onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, policyNumber: e.target.value})}
        />
        <Input 
          type="date" 
          label="Incident Date" 
          onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, incidentDate: e.target.value})}
        />
        <Button onClick={handleSubmit}>Submit Claim</Button>
      </div>
    </Card>
  );
};

Preserving Business Logic without the Junk#

One of the primary advantages of using Replay for Lotus Notes migrations is the ability to prune technical debt. Lotus Notes applications are often cluttered with "Admin Only" fields, legacy lookup buttons that no longer work, and UI elements designed for 800x600 resolution.

Replay’s Blueprints (Editor) allow architects to visually map legacy elements to a modern Design System (Library) before the code is even finalized.

💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay's "Flows" feature to map out the complex state transitions found in Lotus Notes workflow engines. This is often more valuable than the UI itself, as it defines the transition logic for your new BPMN or workflow engine.

The Strangler Fig Pattern in Lotus Notes#

For massive Domino environments with hundreds of databases, a "Strangler Fig" approach is recommended. You don't migrate everything at once. You migrate the most critical user journeys first.

1. •Identify the Core: Use Replay to record the 20% of screens that handle 80% of the business volume.
2. •Proxy the Rest: Keep the legacy Domino server running as a headless data store via the Domino Data Service (REST API).
3. •Visual Extraction: Use Replay to build the new React frontend for those core journeys.
4. •Cutover: Route users to the new modern web UI while the "tail" of the application remains in Notes until it can be decommissioned or archived.

Addressing Security and Compliance#

For Financial Services and Government agencies, "Cloud-only" is often a dealbreaker. Modernizing from Lotus Notes usually involves sensitive PII or HIPAA-regulated data.

Replay is built for these environments. It offers:

• •SOC2 Type II Compliance
• •HIPAA-ready data handling
• •On-Premise Deployment: Run the entire visual reverse engineering suite within your own firewall, ensuring that no sensitive legacy data ever leaves your network.

📝 Note: When extracting components, Replay can be configured to mask sensitive data fields automatically, ensuring that your generated documentation and code snippets remain compliant with data privacy regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does a typical Lotus Notes screen extraction take?#

Using manual methods, an architect might spend 40 hours documenting and coding a single complex Notes form. With Replay, the recording takes minutes, and the component generation takes seconds. Total time, including manual refinement, is typically under 4 hours per screen.

Can Replay handle LotusScript and @Formulas?#

Replay focuses on the observable behavior of the logic. By recording multiple paths through a workflow (e.g., a success path and a failure path), Replay identifies the validation logic and state transitions, generating equivalent modern TypeScript logic. This bypasses the need to manually decompile and translate archaic LotusScript.

What happens to the data in the NSF files?#

Replay handles the UI and Logic modernization. For the data layer, we recommend migrating to a relational database (PostgreSQL/SQL Server) or a document store (MongoDB). Replay provides the API Contracts needed to ensure your new data structure supports the modernized UI.

Does Replay support custom Design Systems?#

Yes. You can feed your corporate Design System into the Replay Library. When Replay extracts a legacy Lotus Notes screen, it will automatically map legacy buttons, inputs, and modals to your modern React components, ensuring brand consistency from day one.

The Path Forward#

The era of the multi-year, multi-million dollar legacy rewrite is over. The $3.6 trillion in technical debt won't be cleared by manual labor; it will be cleared by intelligent automation.

If you are still running mission-critical processes on Lotus Notes, you aren't just dealing with an old UI—you are dealing with a significant operational risk. Visual reverse engineering provides a low-risk, high-speed bridge to the modern web.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.