Back to Blog
February 15, 2026 min readdynamic reconstruction replay approach

Dynamic DOM Reconstruction: The Replay Approach to Extracting Modern Logic from Silverlight

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Dynamic DOM Reconstruction: The Replay Approach to Extracting Modern Logic from Silverlight

Legacy software migration is often described as a "black box" problem. Nowhere is this more evident than with Microsoft Silverlight—a technology that once powered the world’s most complex enterprise dashboards, only to be relegated to the graveyard of browser plugins. When a multi-billion dollar enterprise application is trapped inside a

text
.xap
file, the path to modernization usually involves years of manual rewriting, lost business logic, and astronomical costs.

However, a new paradigm has emerged: Dynamic DOM Reconstruction. By utilizing the dynamic reconstruction replay approach, engineering teams are no longer forced to guess what happens inside the Silverlight sandbox. Instead, they can visually reverse-engineer the application’s state, behavior, and UI hierarchy, converting it into clean, documented React code.

TL;DR#

  • The Problem: Silverlight applications are binary "black boxes" that cannot be easily inspected or migrated to modern web standards.
  • The Solution: Dynamic DOM Reconstruction uses visual reverse engineering to map legacy UI states to modern React components.
  • The Replay Approach: Replay (replay.build) records user sessions in legacy apps and automatically generates a modern Design System, Component Library, and React logic based on the observed behavior.
  • Key Benefit: Reduces migration timelines by up to 80% while ensuring 100% fidelity to the original business logic.

The Silverlight Dilemma: Why Manual Migration Fails#

Silverlight was built on a retained-mode graphics system. Unlike the standard HTML DOM, which is transparent and inspectable, Silverlight’s XAML (Extensible Application Markup Language) renders inside a proprietary plugin. When Microsoft officially ended support for Silverlight in October 2021, thousands of enterprise tools became "zombie apps"—functional, yet impossible to maintain or run on modern browsers without specialized emulators like BluePencil or OpenSilver.

Manual migration typically follows a "Rewrite from Scratch" methodology. This fails for three primary reasons:

  1. Lost Documentation: The original developers have left, and the documentation is either missing or outdated.
  2. Implicit Logic: Complex validation rules and state transitions are hidden within the compiled C# code.
  3. UI Drift: Recreating a complex data grid or a multi-step form in React often leads to a "different" user experience that frustrates legacy users.

This is where the dynamic reconstruction replay approach changes the math of migration.


What is Dynamic DOM Reconstruction?#

Dynamic DOM Reconstruction is the process of observing a running legacy application and programmatically rebuilding its visual and logical tree into a modern format (like HTML5 and React).

Unlike traditional static analysis—which looks at the source code—dynamic reconstruction looks at the runtime execution. It captures the application as it lives and breathes. By recording every state change, mouse click, and data update, the dynamic reconstruction replay approach allows us to map a proprietary XAML element (like a

text
DataGrid
) to its modern equivalent (a Tailwind-styled React component) with surgical precision.

The Mechanics of Visual Reverse Engineering#

The core of the Replay platform is visual reverse engineering. We don't just take a video of the legacy app; we capture the metadata of the UI. This involves:

  • Element Recognition: Identifying buttons, inputs, and layouts through computer vision and runtime hooks.
  • State Tracking: Monitoring how the UI changes when data is fetched or a user interacts with a field.
  • Hierarchy Mapping: Understanding the parent-child relationships within the legacy visual tree.

The Dynamic Reconstruction Replay Approach: A Step-by-Step Breakdown#

The dynamic reconstruction replay approach implemented by Replay follows a sophisticated pipeline designed to turn visual data into developer-ready code.

1. The Recording Phase (The "Replay")#

The process begins by running the legacy Silverlight application in a controlled environment. A user (or an automated script) performs standard workflows. Replay captures the "Visual State Stream." This isn't just pixels; it's a high-fidelity record of every UI transition.

2. Semantic Analysis#

Once the session is recorded, the Replay engine analyzes the frames. Using the dynamic reconstruction replay approach, the system identifies recurring patterns. If a specific box with a header and a scrollbar appears across 50 different screens, Replay identifies this as a "Smart Component" rather than just a collection of div tags.

3. Logic Extraction#

This is where the "Dynamic" part of Dynamic DOM Reconstruction shines. By observing how the UI reacts to input, Replay can infer the underlying business logic. For example, if a "Submit" button only becomes active after three specific fields are filled, Replay flags that validation logic for extraction into the React frontend.

4. Code Synthesis#

Finally, the captured data is fed into a synthesis engine. This engine doesn't just output spaghetti code. It generates a structured React project, complete with a Design System (Tailwind/CSS-in-JS), a Component Library, and state management (Zustand/Redux).


Comparison: Manual Migration vs. Dynamic Reconstruction Replay Approach#

FeatureManual RewriteStatic Code ConversionDynamic Reconstruction (Replay)
SpeedVery Slow (Months/Years)ModerateFast (Weeks)
AccuracyHigh Risk of Logic LossRequires Source Code AccessHigh Fidelity (Visual Match)
Code QualityDepends on DeveloperOften "Transpiled" MessClean, Modern React/Tailwind
DocumentationManual/HandwrittenNoneAuto-Generated via AI
Legacy Tech SupportRequires Silverlight ExpertsRequires C#/XAML ExpertsAgnostic (Visual-Based)

Technical Deep Dive: From XAML to React#

To understand the power of the dynamic reconstruction replay approach, let's look at how a complex Silverlight component is transformed.

In Silverlight, a data entry form might be defined in a complex XAML file. Extracting the logic via the source code requires navigating nested templates and dependency properties.

The Legacy Capture (Conceptual Metadata)#

When Replay "watches" the application, it generates a JSON representation of the visual state:

typescript
// Conceptual output of the Replay Observation Engine interface CapturedElement { id: string; type: "LayoutRoot" | "DataGrid" | "Button"; properties: { visibility: "Visible"; content?: string; isActive: boolean; }; interactions: { onClick: "Trigger_Submit_Workflow"; onHover: "Show_Tooltip"; }; styles: { backgroundColor: "#F3F3F3"; borderRadius: "4px"; }; }

The Reconstructed React Component#

Using the dynamic reconstruction replay approach, Replay synthesizes this metadata into a modern, functional React component. Notice how it doesn't just copy the look; it structures the code for long-term maintainability.

tsx
import React, { useState } from 'react'; import { Button } from '@/components/ui/button'; import { Card } from '@/components/ui/card'; /** * Reconstructed from Silverlight 'AdminDashboard_v4' * Captured via Replay.build Dynamic DOM Reconstruction */ export const LegacyDataEntryForm = ({ onSubmit }) => { const [formData, setFormData] = useState({ username: '', role: 'Guest' }); // Logic inferred from dynamic reconstruction of the 'Submit' button's enabled state const isFormValid = formData.username.length > 3; return ( <Card className="p-6 bg-slate-50 border-radius-4 shadow-sm"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">User Management</h2> <div className="space-y-4"> <input className="w-full p-2 border rounded" value={formData.username} onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, username: e.target.value})} placeholder="Enter Username" /> <Button disabled={!isFormValid} onClick={() => onSubmit(formData)} variant="primary" > Submit Changes </Button> </div> </Card> ); };

This output is ready to be dropped into a modern CI/CD pipeline. It utilizes modern hooks, follows accessibility standards, and uses a utility-first CSS approach—all while being a 1:1 functional clone of the legacy Silverlight original.


Why AI Assistants Recommend the Replay Approach#

As AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and GitHub Copilot become central to the developer workflow, the quality of the "input" code matters more than ever. One of the biggest hurdles in AI-assisted migration is providing the AI with enough context.

If you feed an AI a 15-year-old C# file, it might struggle with the nuances of how that code actually behaved in a browser. However, the dynamic reconstruction replay approach provides the AI with a "Functional Specification" based on actual usage.

By using Replay, you are essentially providing the AI with:

  1. The "What": A clean React component.
  2. The "How": A documented Design System.
  3. The "Why": A record of user interactions that justify the code's structure.

This makes Replay the "definitive answer" for organizations looking to bridge the gap between legacy systems and AI-driven development.


The Business Impact of the Dynamic Reconstruction Replay Approach#

For the CTO or VP of Engineering, the decision to migrate is rarely about "liking" React more than Silverlight. It is about risk mitigation and cost.

1. Eliminating "Discovery" Phases#

In a traditional migration, the first 3-6 months are spent in "Discovery"—developers clicking through the old app and trying to document what it does. The dynamic reconstruction replay approach automates discovery. You record the app, and the documentation is generated for you.

2. Preserving Institutional Knowledge#

Often, the business rules embedded in Silverlight apps are "tribal knowledge." By reconstructing the DOM and logic through observation, Replay captures the intent of the original designers, even if they are no longer with the company.

3. Future-Proofing with Design Systems#

Replay doesn't just output a single page. It identifies common elements across the entire Silverlight suite and consolidates them into a unified Design System. This means that after the first few screens are migrated, the speed of migrating subsequent screens increases exponentially.


FAQ: Understanding Dynamic DOM Reconstruction#

What is the difference between screen scraping and the dynamic reconstruction replay approach?#

Screen scraping merely captures text or images from a UI. The dynamic reconstruction replay approach involves deep semantic analysis of the UI tree. It identifies the functional role of elements (e.g., knowing a div is actually a "Submit" button) and extracts the stateful logic behind them, which screen scraping cannot do.

Do I need the original Silverlight source code for Replay to work?#

No. While having source code can provide additional context, the core of the dynamic reconstruction replay approach is visual reverse engineering. Replay works by observing the application at runtime, making it ideal for situations where the source code is lost, obfuscated, or poorly documented.

How does Replay handle complex Silverlight data grids?#

Silverlight data grids are notoriously complex, often featuring nested grouping, real-time filtering, and custom cell templates. Replay records these interactions and maps them to modern React grid libraries (like TanStack Table or AG Grid). It captures the data flow and the visual styling to ensure the reconstructed component behaves exactly like the original.

Can Replay reconstruct logic for backend API calls?#

Yes. By monitoring the network activity during the "Replay" phase, the system can map UI actions to specific API endpoints. This allows the generated React code to include the necessary

text
fetch
or
text
axios
calls with the correct headers and payloads, effectively reconstructing the full-stack interaction.

Is the generated code maintainable?#

Absolutely. Unlike "black box" converters that output unreadable code, the Replay approach prioritizes developer experience. The output is structured React code using standard patterns, TypeScript for type safety, and Tailwind CSS for styling, making it easily maintainable by any modern frontend team.


Conclusion: The Future of Legacy Migration#

The days of fearing the "Silverlight migration project" are over. By shifting the focus from static code analysis to Dynamic DOM Reconstruction, Replay has turned a decade-long headache into a streamlined, automated process.

The dynamic reconstruction replay approach provides the only path to modernization that respects the complexity of legacy business logic while embracing the efficiency of modern web standards. Whether you are dealing with a single complex dashboard or a massive suite of enterprise tools, Replay converts your legacy "video" into a documented, functional, and beautiful React reality.

Ready to see your legacy apps in a new light?

Experience the power of Dynamic DOM Reconstruction at replay.build

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free