De-risking the Big Bang Migration: Why Legacy Rewrites Fail and How Visual Reverse Engineering Saves Them

The "Big Bang" migration is a $3.6 trillion lie. Every year, enterprise leadership teams sign off on 18-24 month "ground-up" rewrites, only to see 70% of those projects exceed their timelines or fail entirely. We treat legacy systems like disposable artifacts when they are, in fact, the only documented record of your company's actual business logic.

TL;DR: Stop treating legacy modernization as a "delete and replace" mission; use Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay to extract existing logic into modern React components, reducing migration timelines from years to weeks.

The Pathology of the Failed Migration#

Most Enterprise Architects approach modernization through the lens of "The Great Rewrite." They assume that because the UI looks like it was built in 1998, the logic underneath is equally obsolete. This is a fatal mistake. Your legacy system is a battle-hardened repository of edge cases, regulatory requirements, and "weird" business rules that no one remembers writing.

The statistics are damning:

• •70% of legacy rewrites fail to meet their original objectives or timelines.
• •67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation, turning every migration into a manual archaeology project.
• •The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 to 24 months, during which time the business is frozen, unable to ship new features.

When you attempt a Big Bang migration, you aren't just writing new code; you are trying to rediscover a decade of institutional knowledge through manual code review. It is slow, it is expensive, and it is the primary driver of the global $3.6 trillion technical debt crisis.

Comparing Modernization Strategies#

De-risking the Big: From Archaeology to Extraction#

The future isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. We need to move away from "software archaeology" (digging through layers of dead code) and toward "Visual Reverse Engineering."

At Replay, we’ve seen that the most effective way to de-risk the big migration is to use the running application as the source of truth. Instead of reading 100,000 lines of undocumented COBOL or jQuery, you record a real user workflow. Replay captures the DOM states, the network calls, and the user interactions, then uses AI to synthesize that data into clean, documented React components.

💰 ROI Insight: Manual modernization typically requires 40 hours of engineering time per screen for discovery, design, and coding. Replay reduces this to 4 hours per screen—a 90% reduction in manual labor.

The Problem with Manual Discovery#

When an engineer manually migrates a screen, they spend 80% of their time figuring out what the screen does and only 20% writing the new React code. They have to:

1. •Trace the data flow from the legacy backend.
2. •Identify hidden validation logic in the UI.
3. •Map CSS classes to a modern Design System.
4. •Write E2E tests to ensure parity.

This is where the "Big Bang" falls apart. Humans are bad at capturing every edge case. Replay automates this by treating the video of the user session as the blueprint for the new architecture.

The Technical Reality: Extracting the "Black Box"#

When we talk about de-risking the big migration, we are talking about maintaining business logic parity. If your legacy insurance claims form has a specific validation rule for users in California, you cannot afford to "forget" that in the rewrite.

Replay’s AI Automation Suite extracts these rules directly from the execution trace. It generates not just the UI, but the underlying API contracts and TypeScript interfaces.

Example: Generated Component from Replay Extraction#

Here is what a typical output looks like when Replay extracts a legacy workflow into a modern React architecture. Notice how it preserves the business logic while mapping to a modern design system.

typescript
// Generated by Replay Visual Reverse Engineering
// Source: Legacy Claims Portal - Workflow: "Submit Policy Update"
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, Input, Alert } from '@/components/ui/design-system';
import { useLegacyBridge } from '@/hooks/useLegacyBridge';

interface PolicyUpdateProps {
  policyId: string;
  onComplete: (data: any) => void;
}

export const PolicyUpdateForm: React.FC<PolicyUpdateProps> = ({ policyId, onComplete }) => {
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);
  const { fetchLegacyData, submitToModernAPI } = useLegacyBridge();
  
  // Logic extracted from legacy network trace
  const handleValidation = (values: any) => {
    if (values.state === 'CA' && !values.licenseNumber) {
      return "California residents require a valid license number.";
    }
    return null;
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-sm">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-semibold mb-4">Update Policy: {policyId}</h2>
      {/* Replay maps legacy CSS to your modern Tailwind/Shadcn components */}
      <form onSubmit={async (e) => {
        e.preventDefault();
        setLoading(true);
        // ... implementation
      }}>
        <Input label="License Number" name="licenseNumber" required />
        <Button type="submit" loading={loading}>Sync Changes</Button>
      </form>
    </div>
  );
}

⚠️ Warning: Never attempt to rewrite a legacy system without first generating an API Contract. If you don't know exactly what the backend expects, your new frontend is just a pretty shell that will break on day one.

A Phased Approach to UI Modernization#

Instead of a 24-month blackout, we recommend a phased approach using the Replay platform. This allows you to deliver value to the business in weeks, not years.

Step 1: Visual Audit & Technical Debt Assessment#

Use Replay to record every critical path in your legacy application. The platform automatically generates a technical debt audit, identifying which screens are redundant and which contain the highest complexity. This is your "Source of Truth."

Step 2: Component Library Generation#

Using the Replay Library, the platform identifies recurring UI patterns across your legacy app and maps them to your modern Design System. This ensures visual consistency without manual CSS hacking.

Step 3: Automated Extraction (The Blueprints)#

Run the Replay Blueprints editor. This takes your recorded workflows and generates the React code, API contracts, and E2E tests. This is where the 70% time savings happen. You are no longer "writing" code; you are "reviewing" generated code that is already backed by real-world data.

Step 4: Parallel Testing and E2E Parity#

Replay generates Playwright or Cypress tests based on the original legacy recording. You can run the legacy app and the new app side-by-side to ensure 100% functional parity.

typescript
// Generated E2E Test for Parity Verification
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('Verify parity between Legacy and Modern Policy Update', async ({ page }) => {
  // 1. Record state in Legacy
  await page.goto('https://legacy-app.internal/policy/123');
  const legacyValue = await page.locator('#policy-status').innerText();

  // 2. Verify same state in Modernized Component
  await page.goto('https://modern-app.internal/policy/123');
  const modernValue = await page.locator('[data-testid="status-badge"]').innerText();
  
  expect(modernValue).toBe(legacyValue);
});

Built for the Regulated Enterprise#

For CTOs in Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" is often a non-starter. De-risking the big migration also means de-risking the data.

Replay is built for these environments:

• •SOC2 Type II & HIPAA Ready: Your source code and user data are handled with enterprise-grade security.
• •On-Premise Availability: Run the entire Visual Reverse Engineering suite within your own VPC.
• •Air-Gapped Support: For highly sensitive government or defense contracts, Replay can operate without an external internet connection.

💡 Pro Tip: When modernizing in regulated industries, use Replay's "Flows" feature to document the actual user journey for compliance auditors. This provides a visual trail of how data moves through the system, which is often more valuable than the code itself.

Challenging the "New is Better" Myth#

The biggest risk in any migration is the arrogance of the developer. We assume that because we are using Next.js 14, TypeScript, and Tailwind, the software will inherently be "better." But software quality is defined by its ability to solve a business problem reliably.

Legacy systems are reliable. They are just hard to change.

By using Replay to extract the "what" and the "how" from your legacy system, you preserve the reliability while gaining the agility of a modern stack. You aren't just moving pixels; you are migrating the intellectual property of your organization.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual rewrite of a complex enterprise module typically takes 4-6 months, Replay users generally complete the same extraction in 2-3 weeks. This includes the generation of React components, hooks, and API contracts.

What about business logic preservation?#

Replay doesn't just look at the UI; it records the state changes and network traffic during a live session. This means hidden validation logic and data transformation rules are captured in the "Blueprints" and reflected in the generated TypeScript code.

Does Replay support old frameworks like JSP, Silverlight, or Delphi?#

Yes. Because Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering (recording the rendered output and network layer), it is framework-agnostic. If it runs in a browser (or can be surfaced via a web wrapper), Replay can extract it.

How does this fit into a CI/CD pipeline?#

Replay integrates with your existing DevOps stack. The generated E2E tests and API contracts can be pushed directly to GitHub or GitLab, allowing your team to maintain a continuous modernization loop rather than a one-time migration.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.