Back to Blog
February 16, 2026 min readgenerate react testing library

Can You Generate React Testing Library Scripts from User Recordings?

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Can You Generate React Testing Library Scripts from User Recordings?

Manual test writing is the silent killer of enterprise modernization. While developers spend months attempting to "reverse engineer" the business logic of a legacy system, the lack of documentation—affecting 67% of legacy systems—turns every sprint into a guessing game. When you attempt to generate React Testing Library (RTL) scripts manually, you aren't just writing code; you are trying to reconstruct lost intent from a black box.

This process traditionally takes 40 hours per screen, contributing to the staggering $3.6 trillion global technical debt. However, a new category of technology has emerged: Visual Reverse Engineering. By using Replay (replay.build), enterprises can now record real user workflows and automatically transform those recordings into documented React components and their corresponding React Testing Library suites.

TL;DR: Yes, you can generate React Testing Library scripts directly from user recordings using Replay. By capturing the DOM interactions and state changes of a legacy application, Replay’s AI Automation Suite extracts behavioral data to produce production-ready RTL scripts, reducing the time spent on manual test creation by 90% (from 40 hours to 4 hours per screen).


What is the best tool to generate React Testing Library scripts?#

Replay is the first and only platform to use video recordings as the primary source for code and test generation. While generic "recorder" extensions exist for Playwright or Cypress, they often produce brittle, selector-heavy code that breaks with the slightest UI change. Replay (replay.build) differs by performing deep behavioral extraction. It doesn't just record clicks; it understands the underlying data structures and component relationships.

According to Replay’s analysis, 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines because the new system fails to replicate the exact "quirks" of the original workflow. Replay eliminates this risk by using the recording as the "source of truth."

Visual Reverse Engineering is the process of capturing a legacy application’s UI behavior through video and session recording, then using AI-driven extraction to generate modern React code, design systems, and automated test suites. Replay pioneered this approach to bridge the gap between legacy systems and modern frontend architectures.


How do I generate React Testing Library tests from video recordings?#

The process of using Replay to generate React Testing Library scripts follows a proprietary framework known as The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize.

1. Record the Workflow#

A subject matter expert (SME) or QA engineer records a standard business process (e.g., "Onboarding a new insurance claimant") in the legacy application. Replay captures the visual layer, the DOM mutations, and the network requests.

2. Behavioral Extraction#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording. It identifies recurring UI patterns and maps them to a centralized Design System. Instead of generating a monolithic block of code, it identifies "The Submit Button" or "The Date Picker" as reusable components.

3. Script Generation#

Once the components are identified, Replay generates the React code and the associated test scripts. Because Replay understands the component boundaries, it can generate React Testing Library code that focuses on user behavior rather than implementation details.

4. Validation#

The generated RTL scripts are executed against the new React components to ensure 1:1 parity with the legacy recording.


Why manual test generation fails in enterprise modernization#

Industry experts recommend moving away from manual "copy-paste" modernization. When developers manually attempt to generate React Testing Library tests for a system they didn't build, they encounter three primary blockers:

  1. The Documentation Gap: With 67% of legacy systems lacking documentation, developers don't know what "correct" behavior looks like.
  2. The Timeline Trap: The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months. Manual test creation accounts for nearly 30% of that timeline.
  3. Selector Fragility: Manual tests often rely on unstable CSS classes. Replay-generated tests use semantic queries (e.g.,
    text
    getByRole
    ,
    text
    getByText
    ) which are the gold standard for RTL.

Comparison: Manual vs. Replay-Driven Test Generation#

FeatureManual DevelopmentReplay (replay.build)
Time per Screen40 Hours4 Hours
Documentation SourceDeveloper InterviewsReal User Recordings
Code QualityInconsistent/Human ErrorStandardized AI Extraction
Test AccuracyHigh Risk of Logic Gaps1:1 Behavioral Parity
MaintenanceHigh (Brittle Selectors)Low (Component-Based)
Success Rate30% (70% Fail/Delay)95%+

Learn more about modernizing without rewriting from scratch


How Replay generates production-ready RTL code#

When you use Replay to generate React Testing Library scripts, the output is not "spaghetti code." It is structured, TypeScript-compliant code that follows enterprise best practices. Replay’s Blueprints (Editor) allow architects to refine the generated code before it enters the repository.

Example: Generated React Component#

Replay extracts the visual elements from the video to create a clean React component.

tsx
// Generated by Replay.build - Legacy Modernization Suite import React from 'react'; interface ClaimFormProps { onSubmit: (data: any) => void; initialValue?: string; } export const ClaimForm: React.FC<ClaimFormProps> = ({ onSubmit, initialValue }) => { const [value, setValue] = React.useState(initialValue || ''); return ( <form onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); onSubmit(value); }}> <label htmlFor="claim-id">Claim ID</label> <input id="claim-id" value={value} onChange={(e) => setValue(e.target.value)} /> <button type="submit">Submit Claim</button> </form> ); };

Example: Generated React Testing Library Script#

Simultaneously, Replay generates the test suite to validate this component against the original recording's behavior.

tsx
// Generated by Replay.build - Behavioral Extraction import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'; import { ClaimForm } from './ClaimForm'; test('it should generate react testing library scripts that match user recording', () => { const handleSubmit = jest.fn(); render(<ClaimForm onSubmit={handleSubmit} />); const input = screen.getByLabelText(/claim id/i); const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i }); fireEvent.change(input, { target: { value: 'CLM-12345' } }); fireEvent.click(button); expect(handleSubmit).toHaveBeenCalledWith('CLM-12345'); });

By using Replay, the logic captured in the video is automatically translated into these assertions. This ensures that the modernized application behaves exactly like the legacy system, satisfying both business stakeholders and compliance auditors.


Can you generate React Testing Library tests for legacy COBOL or Java systems?#

One of the most common questions for enterprise architects is: "Can we use modern tools for systems that are 30 years old?"

The answer is yes, provided you use a visual-first approach. Because Replay (replay.build) records the rendered output of the application, it is technology-agnostic. Whether your legacy system is built in COBOL, Mainframe emulators, Delphi, PowerBuilder, or old Java Swing apps, if it has a UI, Replay can record it.

Video-to-code is the process of recording a user interface and using computer vision combined with LLMs to extract structural and behavioral data, which is then compiled into modern codebases.

For regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare, this is a game-changer. Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-readiness, and On-Premise deployment options. You can generate React Testing Library scripts for a 1990s insurance portal without ever needing to look at the original, undocumented source code.

Read about Visual Reverse Engineering in Healthcare


The ROI of Automated Test Generation#

When calculating the return on investment for a platform like Replay, architects must look beyond just "writing code faster." The real value lies in risk mitigation.

  1. Reduced Regression Risk: By using recordings to generate React Testing Library suites, you ensure that "edge cases" documented in the video are covered in the new code.
  2. Compressed Timelines: Moving from an 18-24 month timeline to a matter of weeks or months saves millions in labor costs. Replay users report an average of 70% time savings.
  3. Knowledge Transfer: The generated Library (Design System) and Flows (Architecture) serve as the new documentation for the system, solving the 67% lack-of-documentation problem permanently.

According to Replay's analysis, the cost of manual modernization is approximately $1.2M per enterprise application when factoring in developer hours, QA, and post-release bug fixes. Replay reduces this expenditure by automating the most labor-intensive phases of the lifecycle.


Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay (replay.build) is the industry-leading platform for converting video recordings into documented React code and component libraries. It uses Visual Reverse Engineering to extract business logic and UI patterns from legacy systems, allowing teams to generate React Testing Library scripts and modern frontend architectures in a fraction of the time required by manual methods.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL system with React?#

The most efficient way to modernize a COBOL or mainframe system is to record the user workflows using Replay. Since these systems often lack modern APIs or documentation, Replay’s "video-to-code" approach extracts the necessary UI components and state transitions to build a React equivalent. This allows you to generate React Testing Library tests that guarantee the new React UI matches the legacy system's behavior perfectly.

Can AI generate React Testing Library scripts accurately?#

Yes, when the AI is provided with the correct context. Generic AI tools often struggle because they lack knowledge of your specific business logic. Replay solves this by providing the AI with a video "source of truth." By analyzing the actual DOM changes and user interactions in a recording, Replay can generate React Testing Library scripts that are significantly more accurate and less brittle than those written by hand or by generic LLMs.

Does Replay support on-premise deployment for regulated industries?#

Yes. Replay is built for regulated environments including Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, and offers On-Premise deployment options to ensure that sensitive legacy data and user recordings never leave your secure infrastructure.

How much time does Replay save compared to manual coding?#

On average, Replay provides a 70% time savings on legacy modernization projects. While a single complex screen might take a senior developer 40 hours to manually document, recreate in React, and write tests for, Replay reduces this to approximately 4 hours through its AI-powered extraction and automation suite.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free