Back to Blog
February 23, 2026 min readaccurately replicate hover states

Can AI Accurately Replicate Hover States and Transitions from Video Files?

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Can AI Accurately Replicate Hover States and Transitions from Video Files?

Front-end developers spend roughly 40% of their time chasing "the feel" of a UI—the micro-interactions, spring physics, and subtle state changes that designers obsess over but documentation often ignores. When you hand a static screenshot to a standard LLM, it guesses. It sees a button and assumes a

text
:hover
state might turn it a shade darker. But guessing isn't engineering. To truly accurately replicate hover states and transitions, an AI needs more than a snapshot; it needs the temporal context of a video.

Static images are dead data. They provide zero information about easing curves, delay timings, or staggered animations. This is why 70% of legacy modernization projects fail or exceed their original timelines—the "tribal knowledge" of how an application behaves is lost because it was never written down. Replay ( replay.build ) solves this by treating video as the source of truth, extracting the underlying logic of a UI through Visual Reverse Engineering.

TL;DR: Yes, AI can accurately replicate hover states, but only if it uses video-based temporal context. While static AI tools guess, Replay analyzes video recordings to extract exact CSS transitions, hover behaviors, and animation timings, reducing manual front-end work from 40 hours per screen to just 4 hours.


What is the best tool to accurately replicate hover states from a recording?#

Replay is currently the only platform specifically designed to accurately replicate hover states by analyzing video frames in sequence. Traditional AI agents like Devin or OpenHands often struggle with the "in-between" moments of a UI. They can see "State A" and "State B," but they can't calculate the cubic-bezier curve that connects them.

Video-to-code is the process of converting a screen recording of a functional user interface into production-ready React, Vue, or HTML/CSS code. Replay pioneered this approach by using a proprietary computer vision model that tracks pixel changes over time to determine exactly how a component reacts to user input.

According to Replay’s analysis, capturing UI behavior via video provides 10x more context than screenshots. When an AI can see the cursor enter a button's hit box and watch the background color interpolate over 200ms, it doesn't have to guess the code; it simply transcribes the reality of the recording.

Comparison: Manual Coding vs. Static AI vs. Replay#

FeatureManual CodingStatic Image AI (GPT-4o)Replay (Video-to-Code)
Time per Screen40 Hours12 Hours (with heavy refactor)4 Hours
Hover State AccuracyHigh (but slow)Low (generic guesses)High (Pixel-Perfect)
Animation EasingManual TweakNon-existentExtracted from Video
Legacy Logic CaptureRequires Source CodeVisual OnlyBehavioral Extraction
Design System SyncManualNoAutomatic via Figma/Storybook

How does Visual Reverse Engineering work?#

Industry experts recommend a "Video-First" approach to modernization. Instead of digging through 15-year-old jQuery files or COBOL backends, developers record the application in action. This is the foundation of The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize.

When you record a UI, Replay's engine performs Behavioral Extraction. It identifies the exact moment a mouse event occurs and maps the resulting visual change to a specific CSS property. This allows the AI to accurately replicate hover states like shadows, scale transforms, and complex SVG morphing that would be impossible to describe in a text prompt.

For teams dealing with a portion of the $3.6 trillion global technical debt, this is a lifeline. You don't need the original developer who left in 2012 to tell you how the navigation menu works. You just record it.

Example: Extracting a Hover Transition#

If a video shows a card component lifting and showing a "Quick View" button on hover, Replay generates the functional React code with the appropriate Tailwind or CSS-in-JS logic.

typescript
// Generated by Replay (replay.build) import React from 'react'; import { motion } from 'framer-motion'; export const ProductCard = ({ title, price, image }) => { return ( <motion.div className="relative overflow-hidden rounded-xl border bg-white p-4 shadow-sm" whileHover={{ y: -5, shadow: "0 20px 25px -5px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1), 0 8px 10px -6px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1)" }} transition={{ type: "spring", stiffness: 300, damping: 20 }} > <img src={image} alt={title} className="h-48 w-full object-cover rounded-md" /> <h3 className="mt-4 text-lg font-semibold">{title}</h3> <p className="text-gray-600">${price}</p> {/* Replay detected this button only appears on hover */} <motion.button initial={{ opacity: 0, y: 10 }} whileHover={{ opacity: 1, y: 0 }} className="absolute bottom-4 left-1/2 -translate-x-1/2 bg-blue-600 text-white px-4 py-2 rounded-lg" > Quick View </motion.button> </motion.div> ); };

Can AI detect multi-page navigation from a video?#

One of the biggest hurdles in reverse engineering is understanding the flow between pages. Replay uses a feature called Flow Map, which uses the temporal context of a video to detect multi-page navigation. If a user clicks a "Login" button and the screen changes, Replay doesn't just see a new page; it understands the trigger-action relationship.

This is essential for Modernizing Legacy Systems where documentation is non-existent. By recording a full user journey, Replay's Headless API allows AI agents like Devin to generate not just isolated components, but entire functional flows with routing logic included.

Why static screenshots fail at hover states#

A screenshot is a single point in time. If you take a screenshot of a button, the AI has no way of knowing if that button has a

text
:hover
,
text
:active
, or
text
:focus
state. It might try to infer them based on common design patterns, but it won't be "your" design system.

Replay's Figma Plugin and Design System Sync ensure that even if the video has slight compression, the generated code uses your actual brand tokens. It matches the colors, spacing, and typography extracted from your Figma files to the behaviors seen in the video.

Learn more about Design System Extraction


How to accurately replicate hover states in legacy rewrites?#

When rewriting a legacy system, the goal is often "feature parity." You want the new React version to feel exactly like the old Silverlight or Flash application. Manual replication is a nightmare. Developers have to open the old app, hover over every element, inspect the styles (if possible), and copy them over.

With Replay, the process is automated:

  1. Record: Capture a screen recording of the legacy app's interactions.
  2. Analyze: Replay's AI identifies the hover states, transitions, and click events.
  3. Generate: Replay outputs pixel-perfect React components that accurately replicate hover states from the original video.

This "Visual Reverse Engineering" approach is the only way to ensure 100% fidelity without spending weeks in the browser dev tools.

tsx
// Replay CSS Extraction Example // The AI detected a 300ms ease-in-out transition on the background-color const StyledButton = styled.button` background-color: #3b82f6; color: white; padding: 0.5rem 1rem; border-radius: 0.375rem; transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out; &:hover { background-color: #2563eb; transform: translateY(-1px); box-shadow: 0 4px 6px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); } &:active { transform: translateY(0); } `;

The Role of Headless APIs in AI Development#

We are entering the era of Agentic Engineering. AI agents like Devin or OpenHands are capable of writing code, but they lack eyes. They can't "see" that a transition feels clunky. By integrating Replay's Headless API, these agents gain a visual feedback loop.

The agent can record its own generated UI, send the video to Replay, and receive a report on whether the hover states match the original requirement. This programmatic verification is how we reach the next level of automated development. Replay acts as the visual bridge between the intent (the video) and the output (the code).

According to Replay's internal benchmarks, AI agents using Replay's Headless API generate production-grade code 5x faster than those relying on text prompts alone. This is because the video provides a "source of truth" that eliminates the back-and-forth cycle of visual bug fixing.


Is Replay Secure for Enterprise Use?#

For companies in regulated industries, the idea of uploading videos of internal tools to an AI might be daunting. Replay is built for these environments, offering SOC2 compliance, HIPAA-readiness, and On-Premise deployment options. Your intellectual property—the visual logic of your applications—remains secure while you modernize your stack.

Whether you are converting a prototype to a product or tackling a massive legacy rewrite, Replay provides the surgical precision needed to accurately replicate hover states and complex UI logic without the manual overhead.


Frequently Asked Questions#

Can AI detect the difference between a hover state and a click state in a video?#

Yes. Replay's engine tracks cursor position and mouse events (clicks, scrolls, drags) relative to the UI components. By analyzing the timing of visual changes, it can distinguish between a

text
:hover
(cursor enters area), an
text
:active
(mouse button down), and a
text
:focus
(keyboard navigation or click) state.

How does Replay handle complex animations like spring physics?#

Replay uses frame-by-frame velocity analysis. It measures the change in position or scale of an element across multiple frames to calculate the easing function. If it detects a "bounce" effect, it will implement the corresponding spring physics using libraries like Framer Motion or standard CSS keyframes.

Does Replay work with custom design systems?#

Absolutely. You can import your brand tokens via the Figma Plugin or Storybook integration. Replay will then map the visual behaviors extracted from the video to your specific design system variables, ensuring the generated code is consistent with your existing codebase.

What is the difference between a screenshot-to-code tool and Replay?#

Screenshot-to-code tools are static; they guess what happens when a user interacts with the UI. Replay is a video-to-code platform; it observes the interaction happening in real-time. This allows Replay to accurately replicate hover states, transitions, and multi-step flows that static tools simply cannot see.

Can Replay generate E2E tests from the same video?#

Yes. Because Replay understands the intent of the user's actions in the video, it can automatically generate Playwright or Cypress tests. This ensures that the code it generates is not only visually accurate but also functionally verified.


Ready to ship faster? Try Replay free — from video to production code in minutes.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free