Calculating the True TCO of Your 15-Year-Old ERP System

Your 15-year-old ERP isn't just a "legacy system"—it’s a $3.6 trillion liability hiding in plain sight. Most CTOs look at their annual maintenance fees and hosting costs and assume they have a handle on the budget. They are wrong. When calculating the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of a decade-old enterprise system, the visible line items represent less than 20% of the actual drain on your capital.

The "Cost of Doing Nothing" is a myth. Every day that legacy ERP stays in production, it accrues "Archaeology Debt"—the cost of paying senior engineers to dig through undocumented COBOL, Java, or .NET fragments just to understand how a single business rule works. With 67% of legacy systems lacking any usable documentation, your most expensive talent is essentially working as high-paid historians rather than architects.

TL;DR: Calculating the true TCO of a 15-year-old ERP requires factoring in the "Archaeology Tax" and 70% failure risk of traditional rewrites; Replay reduces this burden by extracting documented React components directly from user workflows, cutting modernization timelines from years to weeks.

The Hidden Variables in Calculating the True TCO#

To get an honest number, we have to move beyond the balance sheet. In my 20 years as an Enterprise Architect, I’ve seen companies ignore the "Innovation Tax"—the reality that for every $1 spent on new features, $4 are spent ensuring the legacy ERP doesn't break.

1. The Archaeology Tax (Manual Reverse Engineering)#

Manual documentation is the silent killer of enterprise budgets. On average, it takes a senior developer 40 hours to manually document and map the logic of a single complex legacy screen. In a typical ERP with 200+ screens, that is 8,000 hours of manual labor before a single line of modern code is written.

2. The 70% Failure Rate#

Traditional "Big Bang" rewrites have a catastrophic track record. 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines. When you calculate TCO, you must apply a risk-adjusted multiplier to any rewrite estimate. If your team says it will take 18 months, the statistical reality says it will take 36 months—if it finishes at all.

3. Talent Attrition and Specialized Labor#

As the engineers who built these systems in 2009 retire, the cost of maintaining them skyrockets. You are forced to hire niche consultants at $300/hour because your modern full-stack developers refuse to touch a "black box" system with no tests and no documentation.

Why the "Strangler Fig" Pattern Fails Without Understanding#

Most architects recommend the Strangler Fig pattern: slowly replacing legacy modules with microservices. It sounds good in a whiteboard session, but it falls apart in practice because you cannot "strangle" what you do not understand.

If you don't have a source of truth for the existing business logic, you end up building a "Modern Legacy"—a system that looks like React/Node on the outside but carries the same convoluted, broken logic on the inside. This is where Replay changes the trajectory. Instead of guessing what the legacy system does, you record real user workflows. Replay acts as the "Video Source of Truth," capturing the exact state, data flow, and UI components.

⚠️ Warning: Attempting to modernize a regulated ERP (Healthcare or FinServ) without automated documentation is a compliance nightmare. Manual audits of legacy logic often miss edge cases that lead to SOC2 or HIPAA violations during the transition.

The Replay Methodology: From Black Box to React in Days#

We have moved past the era of manual "code archaeology." The future isn't rewriting from scratch; it's understanding what you already have through Visual Reverse Engineering. By recording a user performing a task in the 15-year-old ERP, Replay extracts the underlying architecture and generates a modern equivalent.

Step 1: Workflow Recording#

Instead of interviewing users and writing requirements that are 50% accurate, we record the actual workflow. Replay captures every API call, every state change, and every UI element.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording and generates documented React components. This isn't just "screen scraping"; it's deep architectural extraction.

Step 3: API Contract Generation#

One of the hardest parts of calculating the true cost of migration is the integration layer. Replay automatically generates API contracts based on the legacy system's behavior, ensuring the new frontend talks to the old backend perfectly during the transition.

Step 4: Technical Debt Audit#

Replay provides a comprehensive audit of what was extracted, highlighting redundant logic and technical debt that should be discarded rather than migrated.

💰 ROI Insight: Companies using Replay see an average of 70% time savings. A project that would typically take 18 months is reduced to a few months of focused execution.

Preserving Business Logic: A Code-First Look#

When we talk about "modernizing without rewriting," we mean preserving the complex business logic that has been battle-tested for 15 years while upgrading the delivery mechanism.

Here is an example of a modern React component generated by Replay after analyzing a legacy ERP's procurement workflow. Note how the business logic (validation, tax calculation) is preserved but implemented in clean, type-safe TypeScript.

typescript
// Generated by Replay Visual Reverse Engineering
// Source: Legacy ERP Module "Procurement_v2_Final"
// Workflow: Purchase Order Approval

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, Alert, Table } from '@/components/ui/design-system';
import { validateTaxRules, calculateLineItems } from '@/lib/legacy-logic-bridge';

interface PurchaseOrderProps {
  orderId: string;
  onApprove: (id: string) => void;
}

export const ModernizedPOView: React.FC<PurchaseOrderProps> = ({ orderId, onApprove }) => {
  const [data, setData] = useState<any>(null);
  const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null);

  // Replay extracted the exact API sequence from the legacy recording
  useEffect(() => {
    async function fetchLegacyData() {
      const response = await fetch(`/api/v1/legacy/orders/${orderId}`);
      const result = await response.json();
      setData(result);
    }
    fetchLegacyData();
  }, [orderId]);

  const handleApproval = () => {
    // Preserving legacy validation logic extracted via Replay Blueprints
    if (!validateTaxRules(data.region, data.total)) {
      setError("Tax compliance mismatch detected in legacy logic.");
      return;
    }
    onApprove(orderId);
  };

  if (!data) return <div>Loading legacy context...</div>;

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">PO Approval: {data.orderNumber}</h2>
      {error && <Alert variant="destructive">{error}</Alert>}
      
      <Table data={data.items} />
      
      <div className="mt-4 flex gap-4">
        <Button onClick={handleApproval} variant="primary">
          Approve (Legacy Sync)
        </Button>
      </div>
    </div>
  );
};

Automating the E2E Test Suite#

One of the largest hidden costs in calculating the true TCO is regression testing. When you touch a 15-year-old ERP, you risk breaking dependencies you didn't even know existed. Replay doesn't just give you the code; it gives you the safety net.

Because Replay records the "Source of Truth" from a real user session, it can automatically generate Playwright or Cypress E2E tests that mirror the legacy behavior.

typescript
// Generated E2E Test: Ensuring Modernized UI matches Legacy Behavior
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('Legacy Workflow Parity: User can complete PO approval', async ({ page }) => {
  // Navigate to the modernized version of the legacy screen
  await page.goto('/modern/procurement/approve/PO-99281');

  // Verify that the data extracted by Replay matches the legacy state
  const orderTotal = await page.locator('.total-amount').innerText();
  expect(orderTotal).toBe('$12,450.00');

  // Trigger the approval logic
  await page.click('button:has-text("Approve")');

  // Verify the legacy backend bridge was called correctly
  const successMessage = await page.locator('.status-toast').innerText();
  expect(successMessage).toContain('Success');
});

The Financial Reality of the "Black Box"#

When an ERP becomes a "black box," the TCO begins to compound like high-interest debt. You aren't just paying for the software; you are paying for the lack of agility. If your competitors can launch a new customer portal in 3 weeks, and your ERP integration takes 6 months, that delta is a direct hit to your market share.

💡 Pro Tip: When presenting a modernization budget to the board, don't just show the cost of the new system. Show the "Archaeology Cost"—the number of hours your team spends simply trying to understand the current system. That is the number that usually shocks the CFO into action.

The Replay Advantage in Regulated Industries#

For Financial Services and Healthcare, "modernizing" isn't just about a prettier UI. It's about data integrity. Replay is built for these environments:

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Your data remains secure.
• •On-Premise Available: For government or high-security manufacturing environments where cloud-only isn't an option.
• •Audit Trails: Every extraction and code generation is documented, providing a clear trail for regulators.

Calculating the ROI of Visual Reverse Engineering#

If we look at a mid-sized ERP modernization project (approx. 100 screens):

• •Manual Approach: 100 screens x 40 hours/screen = 4,000 hours. At $150/hr (blended rate), that’s $600,000 just for the discovery and initial documentation phase.
• •Replay Approach: 100 screens x 4 hours/screen = 400 hours. At the same rate, that’s $60,000.

You have saved $540,000 before you’ve even started the bulk of the development. More importantly, you have saved 3,600 hours of time—roughly 21 months of "calendar time" for a single developer. That is how you turn an 18-month roadmap into a 3-month win.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual audit takes months, a Replay extraction begins the moment you record a workflow. Most teams can go from a recorded legacy session to a documented React component and API contract in under 4 hours per screen. For a standard enterprise module, you can see a fully functional modernized prototype in days, not months.

What about business logic preservation?#

This is Replay's core strength. Unlike generic AI code generators that "hallucinate" logic, Replay uses the video recording as the source of truth. It maps the actual data transformations and state changes that occur in the legacy system, ensuring the generated code reflects the real-world business rules that have been built over the last 15 years.

Does Replay require access to the legacy source code?#

No. Replay is a Visual Reverse Engineering platform. It works by observing the system's behavior, data flows, and UI patterns. This is ideal for legacy systems where the original source code is lost, undocumented, or written in obsolete languages that your current team cannot read.

Can Replay handle complex, multi-step workflows?#

Yes. Replay's "Flows" feature is designed specifically for complex enterprise architecture. It can record multi-screen processes—such as an insurance claim adjustment or a complex manufacturing ERP shipment—and map the entire end-to-end journey into a cohesive set of modern components and state management logic.

Is the generated code maintainable?#

Absolutely. Replay generates standard, clean TypeScript and React code using your organization's own Design System (via the Replay Library). It doesn't produce "spaghetti code." The output is structured, type-safe, and ready for your developers to take over and extend.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.