Back to Blog
February 6, 20269 min readBridging the Documentation

Bridging the Documentation Gap: Why 75% of Legacy Apps Have No Living Specs

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Your legacy system is a black box, and your most senior developers are the only ones holding the keys—until they retire or quit. Every year, enterprises dump millions into "discovery phases" that yield nothing but outdated Confluence pages and brittle spreadsheets. The reality is stark: 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation, and the global technical debt bill has ballooned to $3.6 trillion.

We don't have a coding problem; we have an understanding problem. Bridging the documentation gap isn't about hiring more technical writers to perform "software archaeology." It’s about changing how we extract truth from running systems.

TL;DR: Manual documentation is a failed strategy for legacy systems; Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay allows teams to bridge the documentation gap by extracting living specs, API contracts, and React components directly from user workflows, reducing modernization timelines by 70%.

The Archaeology Trap: Why Manual Documentation Fails#

Most Enterprise Architects approach legacy modernization like an archaeological dig. They assign a team of expensive consultants to sit with users, watch them click buttons, and try to guess what the COBOL or Java 6 backend is doing under the hood. This process is slow, error-prone, and fundamentally disconnected from the source of truth.

When you attempt to document a legacy system manually, you are fighting architectural entropy. By the time a 200-page functional specification is approved, the system has already drifted. This is why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines. You are building on a foundation of assumptions rather than evidence.

The Math of Inefficiency#

The industry standard for manual reverse engineering is roughly 40 hours per screen. This includes discovery, logic mapping, data contract identification, and UI documentation. For an enterprise application with 200 screens, you're looking at 8,000 man-hours before a single line of modern code is written.

💰 ROI Insight: Replay reduces the time spent per screen from 40 hours to 4 hours. In a 200-screen environment, this saves 7,200 hours of high-cost engineering time, allowing you to move from discovery to delivery in weeks rather than years.

Bridging the Documentation Gap with Visual Reverse Engineering#

The future of modernization isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. Visual Reverse Engineering flips the script. Instead of reading dead code or interviewing distracted users, we record the "source of truth": the actual execution of the application.

Replay captures real user workflows and translates those interactions into documented React components, API contracts, and end-to-end tests. This is how you move from a black box to a documented codebase without the "archaeology" phase.

ApproachTimelineRiskCostDocumentation Quality
Big Bang Rewrite18-24 monthsHigh (70% fail)$$$$Often non-existent
Strangler Fig12-18 monthsMedium$$$Partial/Inconsistent
Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay)2-8 weeksLow$100% Accurate/Living

Why "Living Specs" Matter#

A static PDF is a tombstone for a project. "Living specs" are different. They are the programmatic output of how the system actually behaves. When Replay records a session, it isn't just taking a video; it's capturing the state changes, the network calls, and the DOM mutations.

This allows us to generate an API Contract that reflects reality, not what someone thinks the API does.

typescript
// Example: Generated API Contract from Replay Extraction // Service: LegacyClaimsProcessor // Workflow: SubmitNewClaim export interface ClaimSubmissionRequest { claimId: string; // UUID format detected policyNumber: string; // Pattern: [A-Z]{3}-\d{6} incidentDate: string; // ISO8601 claimantDetails: { firstName: string; lastName: string; ssnEncrypted: boolean; }; attachments: Array<{ fileName: string; mimeType: string; sizeKb: number; }>; } export interface ClaimSubmissionResponse { status: 'ACCEPTED' | 'PENDING_REVIEW' | 'REJECTED'; trackingNumber: string; estimatedProcessingDays: number; }

The Three Pillars of Modern Documentation#

To bridge the documentation gap effectively, your output must be actionable for three distinct groups: the Business, the Architects, and the Developers.

1. The Library (Design System)#

Legacy apps are often a hodgepodge of UI patterns. Replay's Library feature extracts these patterns and generates clean, modular React components. Instead of guessing the CSS or the state logic, you get a production-ready component that mirrors the legacy behavior but uses modern best practices.

2. The Flows (Architecture)#

Architecture documentation is usually the first thing to go out of date. Replay automatically maps the "Flows"—the sequence of screens and the logic that connects them. This provides a visual map of the system's state machine, which is essential for any Strangler Fig migration strategy.

3. The Blueprints (Logic)#

The most dangerous part of legacy systems is the "hidden" business logic—the validation rules that only exist in the frontend code or the specific way a form handles edge cases. Replay’s Blueprints capture these rules during the recording phase, ensuring that no business requirement is lost in translation.

⚠️ Warning: Relying on developer memory for business logic is the #1 cause of regression bugs in modernization projects. If it isn't documented in a living spec, it doesn't exist.

Step-by-Step: From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

Bridging the documentation gap requires a systematic approach. Here is how we execute this using Replay:

Step 1: Workflow Mapping#

Identify the critical paths in your application. In a financial services context, this might be "Onboard New Customer" or "Generate Quarterly Report." You don't need to document everything at once; focus on the high-value workflows that are slated for modernization.

Step 2: The "Golden Thread" Recording#

A subject matter expert (SME) performs the workflow while Replay records the session. This "Golden Thread" captures every network request, every state change, and every UI interaction. This becomes the source of truth.

Step 3: Automated Extraction#

Replay's AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording. It identifies recurring UI patterns and maps them to the Library. It looks at the data flowing back and forth to generate OpenAPI specs.

Step 4: Component Generation#

The system generates modern React components based on the extracted blueprints. These aren't just "scraped" versions of the old UI; they are clean, functional components.

tsx
// Example: Modernized React Component generated by Replay import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, Alert } from '@/components/ui'; import { submitClaim } from '@/api/claims'; export const LegacyClaimForm: React.FC<{ policyId: string }> = ({ policyId }) => { const [formData, setFormData] = useState({ incidentDate: '', description: '' }); const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null); // Business logic preserved: Validation for incident date within 30 days const validateDate = (date: string) => { const diff = Date.now() - new Date(date).getTime(); return diff <= 30 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000; }; const handleSubmit = async () => { if (!validateDate(formData.incidentDate)) { setError('Incident must be reported within 30 days.'); return; } await submitClaim({ ...formData, policyId }); }; return ( <div className="p-6 space-y-4"> <TextField label="Incident Date" type="date" onChange={(e) => setFormData({...formData, incidentDate: e.target.value})} /> {error && <Alert variant="destructive">{error}</Alert>} <Button onClick={handleSubmit}>Submit Claim</Button> </div> ); };

Step 5: Validation and E2E Test Generation#

Finally, Replay generates Playwright or Cypress tests that mimic the recorded workflow. This ensures that your new, modernized component behaves exactly like the legacy version, bridging the gap between old and new with 100% confidence.

Challenging the Status Quo: Why You Don't Need a "Discovery Phase"#

The traditional 6-month discovery phase is a relic of waterfall thinking. In a modern enterprise, discovery should be continuous and automated. If your modernization project starts with a three-month period of "understanding the current state" without using automated extraction tools, you are already behind schedule.

Replay allows you to skip the discovery phase entirely. By recording the system in action, you generate documentation and code simultaneously. You aren't "learning" the system to rewrite it; you are "extracting" the system to evolve it.

💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay to audit your technical debt before you start a migration. The platform can identify which screens are most complex and which API endpoints are most fragile, allowing you to prioritize your roadmap based on data, not gut feeling.

Built for the Regulated Enterprise#

We understand that "bridging the documentation gap" in Financial Services, Healthcare, or Government isn't just a technical challenge—it's a compliance requirement.

  • SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data privacy is baked into the extraction process.
  • On-Premise Availability: For highly sensitive environments, Replay can run entirely within your firewall.
  • Technical Debt Audit: Automatically generate the reports required by auditors to show that the modernized system meets the same functional requirements as the legacy one.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual audit of a complex enterprise screen takes 40+ hours, Replay typically extracts a fully documented React component and its associated API contracts in under 4 hours. Most enterprise pilots see a full workflow documented and ready for migration within 48 hours.

What about business logic preservation?#

This is where Replay shines. Because we record the actual execution of the app, we capture the "hidden" logic—the conditional rendering, the client-side validations, and the specific sequence of API calls—that often gets missed in manual documentation. This logic is then reflected in the generated Blueprints and E2E tests.

Does Replay work with mainframe-backed web apps?#

Yes. As long as the legacy system has a web-based frontend (even if it's an old ASP.NET, JSP, or Silverlight app running in a compatibility mode), Replay can record the traffic and interactions to extract the underlying business intent and modern components.

How does this affect our existing CI/CD pipeline?#

Replay is designed to integrate with modern DevOps workflows. The generated components, API contracts, and tests can be pushed directly to your Git repository, serving as the starting point for your new, modernized microservices or frontend architecture.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free