Beyond the Strangler Fig: Why Flow-Based Extraction Is Faster for Enterprise

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis isn't a budget problem; it’s a comprehension problem. For a decade, the "Strangler Fig" pattern has been the industry's security blanket—a slow, methodical way to migrate legacy systems by wrapping new services around old ones. But in an era where 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines, the Strangler Fig has become a trap. It assumes you have the time to spend 18 months on "archaeology" before you write a single line of production code.

The reality is grimmer: 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation. When you attempt to "strangle" a system you don't understand, you aren't migrating; you're just guessing in slow motion. We need to move beyond the Strangler Fig toward Flow-Based Extraction.

TL;DR: While the Strangler Fig pattern relies on slow, manual code archaeology, Flow-Based Extraction using Replay uses video as the source of truth to modernize legacy screens in days rather than months, reducing migration timelines by 70%.

The Strangler Fig Fallacy: Why Modernization Stalls#

The Strangler Fig pattern (popularized by Martin Fowler) suggests that you should incrementally replace system functionality until the old system is eventually "strangled." On paper, it reduces risk. In practice, it introduces a different kind of risk: The Infinite Horizon.

Enterprise architects often spend the first six months of a Strangler Fig project just trying to map out the existing API endpoints and hidden business logic. This "archaeology phase" is where most projects die. You are paying senior engineers to read 15-year-old COBOL or jQuery spaghetti code just to figure out what a "Submit" button actually does.

The Cost of Manual Archaeology#

The industry average for manually documenting and rewriting a single complex enterprise screen is 40 hours. In a typical financial services application with 200+ screens, that’s 8,000 hours of manual labor before accounting for QA and integration.

⚠️ Warning: The biggest risk in modernization isn't the new technology—it's the "lost" business logic hidden in the legacy system that no living employee remembers writing.

What is Flow-Based Extraction?#

Flow-Based Extraction flips the script. Instead of starting with the source code (the "how"), we start with the user workflow (the "what"). By recording a real user performing a task—like processing an insurance claim or auditing a ledger—Replay captures the entire state machine, the API calls, the data transformations, and the UI components.

This isn't just screen recording. It’s Visual Reverse Engineering.

From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

When you record a flow in Replay, the platform deconstructs the legacy "black box" into three distinct outputs:

1. •The Blueprint: A visual map of the architecture and state transitions.
2. •The Contract: Automatically generated API specifications (OpenAPI/Swagger).
3. •The Component: Clean, modular React components that mirror the legacy behavior but use modern design tokens.

💰 ROI Insight: Companies using Replay see an average time savings of 70%, moving from 18-month roadmaps to delivering modernized modules in under three weeks.

The Technical Reality: Generating React from Legacy Chaos#

The primary objection to automated modernization is the quality of the output. "Generated code is junk," is the common refrain. However, Replay doesn't just "scrape" the DOM. It interprets the intent of the workflow.

Consider a legacy form that handles complex validation and conditional logic. In a Strangler Fig approach, you’d spend a week tracing the JavaScript event listeners. With Replay, the logic is extracted directly from the execution trace.

Example: Extracted React Component#

Here is a simplified look at how Replay extracts a legacy form into a modern, type-safe React component:

typescript
// Generated via Replay Visual Reverse Engineering
// Source: Legacy Claims Portal v4.2 (ASP.NET)
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { useDesignSystem } from '@company/ds-library';
import { validateClaim } from './logic/claimValidation';

interface ClaimFormProps {
  claimId: string;
  onSuccess: (data: any) => void;
}

export const ModernizedClaimForm: React.FC<ClaimFormProps> = ({ claimId, onSuccess }) => {
  const { Input, Button, Card, Toast } = useDesignSystem();
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState({ amount: 0, reason: '' });
  const [isSubmitting, setIsSubmitting] = useState(false);

  // Replay extracted this logic from the legacy XHR trace
  const handleSubmit = async () => {
    setIsSubmitting(true);
    try {
      const response = await fetch(`/api/v1/claims/${claimId}/update`, {
        method: 'POST',
        body: JSON.stringify(formData),
        headers: { 'X-Legacy-Session': 'preserved' }
      });
      if (response.ok) onSuccess(await response.json());
    } catch (err) {
      Toast.error("Validation failed: " + err.message);
    } finally {
      setIsSubmitting(false);
    }
  };

  return (
    <Card title="Process Claim">
      <Input 
        label="Settlement Amount" 
        value={formData.amount} 
        onChange={(v) => setFormData({...formData, amount: v})} 
      />
      <Button onClick={handleSubmit} loading={isSubmitting}>
        Submit Modernized Claim
      </Button>
    </Card>
  );
};

💡 Pro Tip: Don't try to fix the backend and the frontend at the same time. Use Replay to extract the frontend logic first, pointing to your legacy APIs via a proxy, then modernize the services once the UI is stable.

The 3-Step Flow-Based Modernization Roadmap#

If you are a CTO looking at a 2-year migration plan, here is how you compress that timeline using Replay.

Step 1: Visual Assessment & Recording#

Instead of reading code, your subject matter experts (SMEs) or QA testers record themselves performing every core business process in the legacy app. These "Flows" become your source of truth. Replay's AI Automation Suite analyzes these recordings to identify common patterns across screens.

Step 2: Extraction & Component Generation#

Replay’s "Blueprints" editor allows you to review the extracted components. You can map legacy UI elements to your modern Design System (Library). If the legacy app used a blue "Submit" button, Replay can automatically replace it with the

component from your new React library.

Step 3: E2E Test & Contract Validation#

One of the highest costs in the Strangler Fig pattern is regression testing. Replay automatically generates End-to-End (E2E) tests based on the original recording.

• •Legacy Output: User clicks A, B happens.
• •Modernized Output: Replay runs a Playwright/Cypress test to ensure the new React component still results in B happening.

typescript
// Replay-generated E2E test to prevent regression
test('Modernized Claim Form matches Legacy Behavior', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/modern/claims/123');
  await page.fill('input[label="Settlement Amount"]', '5000');
  await page.click('button:has-text("Submit")');
  
  // Verify API contract matches legacy trace
  const request = await page.waitForRequest('**/api/v1/claims/123/update');
  expect(request.postDataJSON()).toMatchObject({ amount: 5000 });
});

Addressing the Regulated Enterprise#

For industries like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government, "cloud-only" tools are a non-starter. Technical debt in these sectors is often locked behind strict compliance barriers.

Replay was built for these environments.

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data privacy is baked into the extraction process.
• •On-Premise Availability: Keep your legacy source code and recorded flows within your own firewall.
• •Technical Debt Audit: Replay provides a comprehensive audit trail of what was changed, what was preserved, and why, which is essential for regulatory oversight.

Why "Understanding" Beats "Rewriting"#

The "Big Bang" rewrite fails because it attempts to build a future based on a misunderstood past. The Strangler Fig fails because it moves too slowly to keep up with business demands.

Flow-Based Extraction is the middle path. It acknowledges that the legacy system—despite its technical debt—is the only accurate documentation of the business logic. By using video as the source of truth, Replay allows you to extract that logic, package it into modern React components, and deploy it in a fraction of the time.

Stop doing archaeology. Start doing architecture.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual rewrite takes roughly 40 hours per screen, Replay reduces this to 4 hours. For a standard enterprise module, you can move from recording to a functional React prototype in 2-5 days.

What about business logic preservation?#

This is Replay’s core strength. Because we record the actual execution trace of the application, we capture the "side effects" and hidden logic that static analysis tools miss. The generated code reflects the actual behavior of the system, not just the visible UI.

Does Replay support monolithic backend migrations?#

Replay focuses on the "Head" of the system—the UI and Orchestration layer. By generating API contracts (Swagger/OpenAPI) from legacy flows, we provide the blueprint your backend teams need to build modern microservices that perfectly match the frontend's requirements.

Can we use our own Design System?#

Yes. Replay’s Library feature allows you to upload your existing React component library. During the extraction phase, you can map legacy CSS classes or HTML structures to your specific components, ensuring the modernized app is on-brand from day one.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.