Beyond the Str

The Strangler Fig pattern is failing the modern enterprise. While Martin Fowler’s 2004 approach of incrementally replacing legacy systems was a breakthrough for its time, it has become the "slow death" of the IT budget in an era of $3.6 trillion in global technical debt. For a Fortune 500 company, a traditional Strangler Fig migration takes an average of 18 to 24 months per module—by the time you’ve "strangled" the legacy system, the "modern" replacement is already approaching obsolescence.

We have reached a breaking point where 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines. The bottleneck isn't the coding; it's the archaeology. When 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation, your senior architects spend 80% of their time playing detective instead of building value. To move Beyond the Strangler Fig, we must stop trying to manually decipher 20-year-old COBOL or Java monoliths and start using Visual Reverse Engineering to extract the only source of truth that matters: the user workflow.

TL;DR: Moving Beyond the Strangler Fig means replacing manual code archaeology with Visual Reverse Engineering—recording user workflows to automatically generate documented React components and API contracts, reducing modernization timelines from years to weeks.

The Architectural Debt Trap#

The fundamental flaw in the Strangler Fig approach is the "Black Box" problem. Most enterprise systems in Financial Services, Healthcare, and Insurance are undocumented monoliths where the original authors retired a decade ago.

When you attempt to "strangle" these systems, you are essentially trying to build a bridge while simultaneously guessing the depth of the river. You end up with "Shadow Logic"—hidden business rules buried in the UI or middleware that no one remembers. This is why the average enterprise rewrite timeline stretches to 18 months or more.

Modernization Methodology Comparison#

⚠️ Warning: The "Big Bang" rewrite is almost never the answer. The risk of total project collapse increases by 15% for every six months the project remains in development without a production release.

Beyond the Strangler Fig: The Rise of Visual Reverse Engineering#

Visual Reverse Engineering shifts the focus from the code to the behavior. Instead of reading 50,000 lines of spaghetti code to understand a claims processing screen, you record a real user performing that task.

Replay captures every interaction, every API call, and every state change. It then uses an AI Automation Suite to translate that visual data into clean, documented React components and technical specifications. This isn't just "recording a video"; it's telemetry-driven code generation.

Why Video is the New Source of Truth#

In a manual audit, a senior architect takes approximately 40 hours to fully document a complex legacy screen—accounting for hidden validation logic, edge cases, and API dependencies. With Replay, that same screen is extracted in 4 hours.

By using video as the source of truth, you eliminate the "telephone game" between business stakeholders, developers, and the legacy system. You see exactly what the system does, not what the outdated documentation says it does.

The Replay Framework: From Black Box to React in Days#

To move Beyond the Strangler Fig, you need a structured pipeline that converts visual data into production-ready assets. Replay facilitates this through four core pillars:

1. •Flows (Architecture): Mapping the user journey across the legacy landscape.
2. •Library (Design System): Identifying recurring UI patterns to build a modern React-based design system.
3. •Blueprints (Editor): Refining the extracted logic before code generation.
4. •AI Automation Suite: Generating the final technical debt audit, E2E tests, and API contracts.

Step 1: Visual Assessment and Recording#

Instead of a three-month discovery phase, you spend three days recording key user workflows. These recordings capture the "as-is" state of the system with 100% fidelity.

Step 2: Component Extraction#

Replay analyzes the recording and identifies UI components, state transitions, and business logic. It doesn't just "scrape" the UI; it understands the underlying data structures.

typescript
// Example: Generated React component from a Replay video extraction
// This component preserves the legacy business logic while using modern hooks
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { LegacyService } from '@/api/legacy-bridge';

export const ClaimsProcessingForm: React.FC<{ claimId: string }> = ({ claimId }) => {
  const [data, setData] = useState<ClaimData | null>(null);
  const [isProcessing, setIsProcessing] = useState(false);

  // Business Logic preserved: Validation rules extracted from legacy behavior
  const validateClaim = (values: any) => {
    if (values.amount > 5000 && !values.supervisorOverride) {
      return { valid: false, error: "Supervisor override required for high-value claims" };
    }
    return { valid: true };
  };

  return (
    <div className="modern-container">
      <h3>Modernized Claim Entry: {claimId}</h3>
      <ModernForm 
        initialData={data} 
        onValidate={validateClaim}
        onSubmit={async (values) => {
          setIsProcessing(true);
          await LegacyService.submit(values);
          setIsProcessing(false);
        }}
      />
    </div>
  );
};

💰 ROI Insight: Companies using Replay see an average of 70% time savings. For a project budgeted at $2M with a 12-month timeline, this translates to a $1.4M saving and a 3-month delivery.

Bridging the Gap: API Contracts and E2E Tests#

One of the most dangerous parts of moving Beyond the Strangler Fig is the integration layer. How do you ensure your new React frontend talks correctly to a 30-year-old mainframe?

Manual API documentation is notoriously unreliable. Replay solves this by generating API contracts based on the actual traffic observed during the recording. If the legacy system expects a specific non-standard date format or a hidden header, Replay catches it.

yaml
# Generated API Contract from Replay Flow
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
  title: Legacy Claims API (Extracted)
  version: 1.0.0
paths:
  /v1/claims/submit:
    post:
      summary: Extracted from "Standard Claims Workflow"
      parameters:
        - name: X-Legacy-Auth-Token
          in: header
          required: true
          schema:
            type: string
      requestBody:
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              type: object
              properties:
                claim_amount: { type: number }
                incident_date: { type: string, format: "YYYY-MM-DD" } # Validated from trace

Built for the Regulated Enterprise#

Modernization in Financial Services, Government, and Healthcare isn't just a technical challenge; it's a compliance hurdle. You cannot simply upload legacy screenshots to a public LLM.

Replay is designed for high-security environments:

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data handling that meets the strictest regulatory standards.
• •On-Premise Available: For air-gapped environments or sensitive government infrastructure.
• •Audit Trails: Every extracted component is linked back to the original video source, providing a "paper trail" for why specific logic was implemented.

📝 Note: When modernizing in regulated industries, the "Why" is as important as the "How." Visual Reverse Engineering provides the evidence required by compliance teams to prove the new system maintains the integrity of the old.

The End of "Documentation Archaeology"#

The $3.6 trillion technical debt problem exists because we have treated documentation as an afterthought. We expect developers to write code and document it, which they rarely do.

By moving Beyond the Strangler Fig to a Visual Reverse Engineering model, documentation becomes a byproduct of the modernization process, not a prerequisite. You don't need to find the "one guy who knows how the COBOL works." You just need to see the system in action.

The New Modernization Workflow#

1. •Record: Capture real user interactions in the legacy environment.
2. •Analyze: Replay identifies components, data flows, and dependencies.
3. •Generate: Clean React code, API contracts, and E2E tests are produced automatically.
4. •Refine: Developers use Replay’s Blueprints to tweak logic and styling.
5. •Deploy: Ship the modernized module in weeks, not years.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle business logic that isn't visible in the UI?#

While Replay is a visual-first platform, it captures the network layer and state changes associated with every visual action. By analyzing the "cause and effect" between UI inputs and API outputs, Replay reconstructs the underlying business logic. For complex "hidden" logic, Replay provides a Technical Debt Audit that flags areas where manual code review is recommended.

Is this just another "No-Code" tool that creates vendor lock-in?#

No. Replay generates standard, clean React/TypeScript code and OpenAPI specifications. Once the code is extracted and generated, it is yours. There is no proprietary runtime required. Replay is the engine for the migration, not the hosting platform for the result.

What industries benefit most from Visual Reverse Engineering?#

Any industry with "High-Stakes Legacy"—systems that are too critical to fail but too old to maintain. We see the highest impact in:

• •Financial Services: Core banking and loan origination.
• •Healthcare: Patient management and claims processing.
• •Insurance: Policy administration and underwriting.
• •Manufacturing: Inventory and supply chain logistics.

How long does a typical pilot project take?#

A standard Replay pilot typically lasts 2 to 4 weeks. During this time, we usually extract 5-10 complex screens, generate the corresponding React components, and establish the API contracts required for the new architecture.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.