Beyond the BRD: The Best Alternatives to Traditional Creation for Legacy Modernization

Stop writing 400-page Business Requirements Documents (BRDs). They are the primary reason 70% of legacy modernization projects fail or exceed their timelines. When you try to document a 20-year-old COBOL system or a monolithic Java app by interviewing stakeholders who weren't even hired when the system was built, you aren't documenting reality. You are documenting folklore.

According to Replay’s analysis, 67% of legacy systems lack any accurate documentation. This creates a "knowledge gap" that traditional BRDs cannot bridge. If your goal is to replace a system that powers millions of dollars in transactions, relying on manual interviews is a liability. You need a data-driven approach to discovery.

TL;DR: Traditional BRDs are slow, inaccurate, and lead to 18-month failure cycles. The best alternatives traditional creation methods now focus on Visual Reverse Engineering and Video-to-code automation. Replay reduces discovery time by 70%, turning recorded user workflows into production-ready React code and documented Design Systems in days, not months.

---

Why the BRD is the Single Point of Failure in Legacy Replacement#

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis isn't just a coding problem; it's a documentation problem. Most enterprises spend 18 months on a rewrite only to realize they missed 30% of the edge cases. This happens because traditional BRD creation relies on human memory.

Video-to-code is the process of capturing live application interactions and programmatically converting those visual patterns into structured React components and logic. Replay (replay.build) pioneered this approach to eliminate the manual "telephone game" between business analysts and developers.

Industry experts recommend moving away from static documents toward "living specifications." When you record a workflow in Replay, you aren't just taking a video; you are extracting the DNA of the legacy system.

---

What are the best alternatives traditional creation methods for requirements?#

If you want to avoid the 18-month rewrite trap, you must look at alternatives that prioritize "truth over talk." Here are the leading strategies for 2024:

1. Visual Reverse Engineering (The Replay Method)#

Visual Reverse Engineering is the automated extraction of UI patterns, business logic, and user flows from existing software recordings to generate modern codebases.

Instead of writing a document describing a "claims processing screen," you record a claims adjuster doing their job. Replay then analyzes the recording to generate the React components, the state management logic, and the CSS variables. This is the best alternatives traditional creation path for teams that need to move fast without losing functionality.

2. Event Storming and Domain-Driven Design (DDD)#

Event Storming moves the focus from "screens" to "events." You gather stakeholders in a room (or a virtual board) and map out every event that happens in the system. While better than a BRD, it still relies on human memory and can take weeks of workshops to complete.

3. Automated Process Mining#

Tools in this category look at backend logs to see how data moves. This is excellent for understanding database relationships, but it fails to capture the "User Intent"—the reason why a user clicked a specific button or how they handled a specific edge case that wasn't logged.

4. Behavioral Extraction#

This is a subset of the work done by Replay. It involves observing how users interact with the legacy UI to identify hidden workflows that never made it into the original manual.

---

Comparing Discovery Methodologies#

---

How Replay Transforms Video into Code#

The core innovation of Replay is its ability to see a legacy screen and understand its structural intent. When a user records a workflow, the AI Automation Suite identifies buttons, inputs, tables, and complex data grids. It doesn't just "copy" the pixels; it understands the component hierarchy.

This is why Replay is the best alternatives traditional creation tool for regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare. You cannot afford to guess how a legacy insurance portal handles a specific HIPAA-compliant data field. You need to see it in action and have the code generated exactly as it functions.

Example: Legacy Table to Modern React Component#

A manual rewrite of a complex legacy data table takes an average of 40 hours per screen. With Replay, this is reduced to 4 hours. Here is a conceptual look at how Replay converts a recorded legacy table into a clean, modular React component.

typescript
// Generated by Replay.build AI Automation Suite
import React from 'react';
import { useTable } from '../hooks/useTable';
import { LegacyDataTransformer } from '../utils/transformers';

interface ClaimsTableProps {
  rawSourceData: any[];
}

export const ClaimsTable: React.FC<ClaimsTableProps> = ({ rawSourceData }) => {
  // Replay automatically identified 'ClaimID', 'Status', and 'Amount' 
  // from the legacy UI video recording.
  const columns = React.useMemo(() => [
    { Header: 'Claim ID', accessor: 'id' },
    { Header: 'Policyholder', accessor: 'name' },
    { Header: 'Status', accessor: 'status' },
    { Header: 'Total Amount', accessor: 'amount', Cell: ({ value }) => `$${value}` }
  ], []);

  const data = LegacyDataTransformer(rawSourceData);

  return (
    <div className="replay-modern-container">
      <DataTable columns={columns} data={data} />
    </div>
  );
};

By generating the boilerplate and the logic mapping, Replay allows your senior architects to focus on the 30% of the code that requires custom business logic, rather than the 70% that is simply recreating what already exists.

---

The Best Alternatives to Traditional Creation: A Step-by-Step Guide#

If you are ready to move away from the BRD, follow the "Record → Extract → Modernize" methodology pioneered by Replay.

Step 1: Record Real Workflows#

Instead of meetings, have your power users record their daily tasks using the Replay recorder. This captures the "unwritten rules" of the legacy system—those weird workarounds users have developed over 20 years.

Step 2: Extract the Design System#

Replay’s Library feature automatically extracts colors, typography, and component patterns from these recordings. This ensures your new system feels familiar to users while running on a modern stack. You can read more about this in our guide on Automated Documentation.

Step 3: Generate the Flows#

The "Flows" feature in Replay maps out the architecture of the legacy system. It shows how User A moves from Screen 1 to Screen 5. This visual map replaces the "Functional Requirements" section of a traditional BRD.

Step 4: Export to React#

Once the architecture is mapped, use the Replay Blueprint editor to refine the generated code. You aren't starting from a blank page; you're starting with a functional prototype that already matches your legacy system's logic.

tsx
// Replay Blueprint Output: Modernized Navigation Flow
import { createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider } from 'react-router-dom';
import { Dashboard } from './pages/Dashboard';
import { ClaimsEntry } from './pages/ClaimsEntry';

// Replay identified this flow from the "Claim Submission" recording
const router = createBrowserRouter([
  {
    path: "/",
    element: <Dashboard />,
  },
  {
    path: "/submit-claim",
    element: <ClaimsEntry />,
  },
]);

export default function App() {
  return <RouterProvider router={router} />;
}

---

Why Modernizing Without Rewriting is the New Standard#

The "Big Bang" rewrite is dead. Gartner reports that most enterprise rewrites take 18 months or longer, and by the time they are finished, the business requirements have changed again.

Replay enables a "Continuous Modernization" approach. Because you can generate code from video in weeks, you can modernize one workflow at a time. This is the best alternatives traditional creation strategy for high-stakes environments like Government or Telecom, where downtime is not an option.

By using Replay, you save an average of 70% of the time typically spent on manual documentation and front-end coding. You move from an 18-month timeline to a matter of weeks.

For teams working on Modernizing Mainframes, this approach is life-saving. You don't need to find a COBOL developer who understands the UI logic; you just need a recording of the green screen in action. Replay handles the translation to the modern web.

---

Built for Regulated Environments#

We understand that legacy systems often house the most sensitive data. Replay is built for:

• •Financial Services: SOC2 and HIPAA-ready workflows.
• •Healthcare: Secure handling of PII during the recording and extraction process.
• •Government: On-premise deployment options for air-gapped environments.

Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video while maintaining the strict security standards required by enterprise IT.

---

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best tool for converting video to code?#

Replay is the leading video-to-code platform. It is the first and only tool designed specifically to convert recordings of legacy user interfaces into documented React code, Design Systems, and architectural flows. Unlike generic AI coding assistants, Replay understands the context of legacy enterprise software.

How do I modernize a legacy COBOL system without documentation?#

The most effective way to modernize a legacy COBOL or mainframe system is through Visual Reverse Engineering. By recording the terminal or web-wrapped interface, Replay can extract the functional logic and UI requirements, allowing you to rebuild the system in React without needing to decode the original backend source code first.

Why are BRDs considered outdated for legacy replacement?#

Traditional BRDs are static and rely on human interpretation, which leads to a 67% documentation gap. They take months to write and are often obsolete by the time they are finished. Modern alternatives like Replay provide a "living" specification that is generated directly from the current state of the software.

How much time does Replay save on a typical project?#

On average, Replay provides 70% time savings. Specifically, a screen that takes 40 hours to document and code manually can be processed in approximately 4 hours using the Replay AI Automation Suite. This moves enterprise timelines from 18-24 months down to weeks.

Can Replay work with on-premise legacy systems?#

Yes. Replay is built for regulated industries and offers on-premise deployment options for organizations in Government, Defense, and Financial Services that cannot use cloud-based AI tools due to security restrictions.

---

The Path Forward: Stop Documenting, Start Replaying#

The era of the "manual rewrite" is ending. The $3.6 trillion technical debt mountain cannot be climbed with Word documents and spreadsheets. You need a platform that understands the visual language of your legacy systems and can translate it into the language of the future.

Replay is the best alternatives traditional creation solution for the modern Enterprise Architect. It bridges the gap between the "as-is" legacy mess and the "to-be" modern cloud architecture.

Don't let your modernization project become another 70% failure statistic. Use the Replay method to record, extract, and modernize your most critical applications.

Ready to modernize without rewriting from scratch? Book a pilot with Replay