Back to Blog
January 31, 20269 min readBeyond Static Analysis:

Beyond Static Analysis: Why Code-Only Modernization Misses 40% of Business Logic

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

Static analysis is the security blanket of the Enterprise Architect. It feels safe, it’s automated, and it’s fundamentally incomplete. If you are relying solely on grepping through 15-year-old Java monoliths or running SonarQube to plan your modernization strategy, you are walking into a $3.6 trillion trap.

The reality of enterprise software is that the source code is rarely the source of truth. The true "spec" of your system exists in the interaction between the user and the runtime environment. When you analyze code in a vacuum—ignoring the actual execution paths and state changes—you miss up to 40% of the business logic that keeps your company running. This "shadow logic" is why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines. You aren't just rewriting code; you're trying to perform archaeology on a living organism using only its skeleton.

TL;DR: Static analysis fails because it ignores runtime behavior and implicit user workflows; Replay captures the "missing 40%" of business logic through Visual Reverse Engineering, reducing modernization timelines from years to weeks.

The Static Analysis Trap: Why Your "Source of Truth" is Lying#

Most modernization projects begin with a "discovery phase" that lasts six months and produces a 200-page PDF that no one reads. Architects use static analysis tools to map dependencies and estimate complexity. But code that hasn't been touched in a decade is full of "dead" paths, redundant abstractions, and—most dangerously—undocumented side effects that only trigger under specific runtime conditions.

Static analysis tells you what the code says. It doesn't tell you what the system does.

The Gap Between Code and Reality#

In a typical Financial Services or Healthcare legacy stack, the business logic is often buried in:

  • Stored procedures that are called dynamically.
  • Conditional UI rendering based on undocumented state flags.
  • Third-party integrations that behave differently in production than in dev.
  • Legacy "hacks" that have become core business rules over time.

When you attempt a "Big Bang" rewrite based on static analysis, you inevitably break these hidden rules. This leads to the "90% done" syndrome, where the project stays at 90% completion for a year while developers play whack-a-mole with bugs that weren't in the original requirements.

ApproachTimelineRiskCostBusiness Logic Capture
Big Bang Rewrite18-24 monthsHigh (70% fail)$$$$Manual/Incomplete
Strangler Fig12-18 monthsMedium$$$Incremental
Static Analysis Only6-12 monthsHigh$$~60% (Misses Runtime)
Replay (Visual Reverse Engineering)2-8 weeksLow$99% (Runtime Truth)

The Missing 40%: What You Aren't Seeing#

What exactly is this "missing 40%"? It’s the delta between the technical documentation (which 67% of legacy systems lack anyway) and the actual user experience.

1. Implicit State Transitions#

Static analysis can show you a function, but it can’t easily show you the global state of a complex Insurance claims portal after a user has navigated through six different screens. Replay captures these transitions by recording the actual workflow, turning the "black box" of the legacy UI into a documented state machine.

2. The "Bug-as-Feature" Phenomenon#

In manufacturing or telecom systems, users often develop workarounds for system bugs. Over time, these workarounds become the standard operating procedure. If you modernize the code to "fix" the bug without understanding the workflow, you break the business process. Visual Reverse Engineering records the actual way work gets done, not just the way the original (and likely departed) developer intended it to work.

3. Dynamic Data Dependencies#

Legacy systems are notorious for "string-ly typed" logic—where a specific string in a database column changes the entire behavior of a front-end form. Static analysis struggles to trace these data-driven logic paths.

⚠️ Warning: Relying on manual documentation for legacy systems is a recipe for disaster. Most enterprise systems have a "Documentation Half-Life" of 18 months. If it hasn't been updated since 2021, it's a work of fiction.

Beyond Static Analysis: The Replay Methodology#

The future of modernization isn't rewriting from scratch; it's understanding what you already have with surgical precision. Replay introduces the concept of Visual Reverse Engineering. Instead of reading code to guess behavior, we record behavior to generate code.

From 40 Hours to 4 Hours#

The industry average for manually documenting and recreating a complex enterprise screen is roughly 40 hours. This includes discovery, requirement gathering, UI design, and front-end development. With Replay, this is compressed into 4 hours.

We don't just take a screenshot; we record the DOM mutations, the network calls, and the state changes. The platform then uses AI to transform that recording into a modern React component, complete with clean CSS and documented API contracts.

💰 ROI Insight: For a 100-screen enterprise application, manual modernization costs approximately $800,000 in developer hours. Replay reduces this to under $80,000 while eliminating the "discovery debt" that usually causes project overruns.

typescript
// Example: A legacy "Black Box" component extracted via Replay // The AI identifies business-critical logic that static analysis would miss, // such as specific validation rules triggered by runtime network responses. import React, { useEffect, useState } from 'react'; import { LegacyService } from '@internal/legacy-api'; export const ClaimsProcessor: React.FC<{ claimId: string }> = ({ claimId }) => { const [status, setStatus] = useState<'idle' | 'processing' | 'error'>('idle'); const [data, setData] = useState<any>(null); // Replay extracted this logic from a recorded session where a // 403 error on a specific sub-call actually meant "Redirect to Manual Review" // - a detail missing from the legacy Swagger docs. const handleProcess = async () => { try { const response = await LegacyService.process(claimId); if (response.code === 'ERR_AUTH_09') { // Logic found via runtime observation: window.location.href = `/manual-review/${claimId}`; return; } setData(response.payload); } catch (e) { setStatus('error'); } }; return ( <div className="modern-ui-wrapper"> <button onClick={handleProcess}>Process Claim</button> {data && <ClaimDetailView data={data} />} </div> ); };

How Visual Reverse Engineering Works: A 3-Step Guide#

Modernizing a legacy system shouldn't feel like an archaeology dig. Here is how Replay transforms the workflow:

Step 1: Record the Truth#

Instead of interviewing stakeholders who might not remember how the system works, you record a real user performing a business-critical workflow. Whether it's an underwriter processing a policy or a nurse updating a patient record, the video becomes the "Source of Truth."

Step 2: Extract the Blueprint#

Replay's engine analyzes the recording. It maps the UI components, identifies the underlying data structures, and logs every API interaction. It generates a Blueprint—a technical bridge between the old world and the new.

Step 3: Generate the Modern Stack#

From the Blueprint, Replay generates:

  • Clean React Components: Using your organization's Design System (via the Replay Library).
  • API Contracts: Documenting exactly what the front-end needs from the back-end.
  • E2E Tests: Automatically creating Playwright or Cypress tests that mirror the recorded workflow.
  • Technical Debt Audit: Identifying which parts of the legacy logic are redundant and can be retired.

💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay to generate your E2E test suite before you start the rewrite. This gives you a "Green/Red" baseline to ensure your modern version exactly matches the legacy behavior.

Built for Regulated Environments#

We understand that Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government agencies can't just upload their screens to a public cloud. Technical debt is a security risk, but so is data exposure.

Replay is built for these constraints:

  • SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Compliance is baked into the platform.
  • On-Premise Deployment: Run Replay entirely within your own firewall.
  • PII Redaction: Automatically scrub sensitive data from recordings before they are processed by the AI Automation Suite.

The Cost of Waiting#

The global technical debt stands at $3.6 trillion. Every day you wait to modernize, that debt accrues interest. Developers spend more time maintaining "zombie code" than building new features. The talent gap is widening—finding developers who want to work in COBOL or legacy PowerBuilder is becoming an expensive impossibility.

The "Big Bang" rewrite is dead. The "Manual Archaeology" approach is too slow. The only way forward is to leverage the runtime truth of your systems.

📝 Note: Replay doesn't just replace your legacy UI; it documents your business logic for the next generation of engineers. It turns your "black box" into a searchable, understandable, and modular codebase.

typescript
// Replay Blueprint Output: API Contract Generation // Automatically derived from observed network traffic during a legacy workflow. /** * @generated By Replay Visual Reverse Engineering * Source: Legacy Insurance Portal - Claims Submission Workflow * Risk Level: High (Financial Impact) */ export interface ClaimSubmissionRequest { id: string; timestamp: string; // Note: The legacy system requires this 'x-legacy-flag' // for claims over $5000 - discovered via Replay runtime analysis. metadata: { priority: number; 'x-legacy-flag': boolean; }; payload: { claimant_name: string; policy_number: string; incident_date: string; }; }

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle sensitive PII during recording?#

Replay includes built-in PII masking. You can define specific selectors or patterns to redact before any data leaves your secure environment. For highly regulated industries, our on-premise solution ensures that no data ever exits your network.

Does Replay require access to the legacy source code?#

No. That is the power of Visual Reverse Engineering. Replay works by observing the application at runtime. This makes it perfect for systems where the source code is lost, poorly documented, or too complex to navigate.

How does this integrate with our existing Design System?#

The Replay Library allows you to map legacy UI elements to your modern React component library. When Replay extracts a screen, it doesn't just give you generic HTML; it gives you code that uses your specific buttons, inputs, and layout components.

What is the typical timeline for a pilot project?#

Most organizations see their first fully documented and migrated screens within 48 hours. A full pilot covering a core business flow typically takes 2 weeks from setup to code delivery.

How does Replay help with Technical Debt Audits?#

By comparing the recorded runtime paths with the existing codebase, Replay identifies "Dark Code"—functions and modules that are never actually executed. This allows teams to safely decommission up to 30% of their legacy footprint before they even begin the rewrite.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free