Beyond Code Analysis: Why

The global technical debt crisis has reached a staggering $3.6 trillion. For the average enterprise, legacy systems aren't just a maintenance burden; they are a strategic anchor. When 70% of legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines, the industry must admit that our current methodology is broken. We have spent decades attempting to "solve" modernization through static code analysis and manual "archaeology," yet we continue to hit the same walls.

To move faster, we must look beyond code analysis. The future of modernization isn't found in the obfuscated, undocumented source code of 2005—it’s found in the living, breathing execution of the application as it exists today.

TL;DR: Visual Reverse Engineering bypasses the "archaeology" phase of modernization by using runtime video and DOM recording as the source of truth, reducing migration timelines from years to weeks.

The Failure of Static Code Analysis in Legacy Environments#

Traditional modernization begins with a "Discovery" phase. This usually involves a room full of expensive consultants trying to make sense of a Java or .NET monolith that hasn't seen a documentation update in a decade. Statistics show that 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation.

Static code analysis (SCA) tools attempt to map these systems by scanning the codebase. However, SCA has three fatal flaws in a modernization context:

1. •Dead Code Bloat: Large-scale systems are often 30-50% dead code. SCA treats all code as equally important, leading teams to modernize features that no one actually uses.
2. •Runtime Obfuscation: In legacy systems, business logic is often buried in stored procedures, dynamic reflections, or complex middleware that static scanners cannot resolve.
3. •The Intent vs. Reality Gap: Code tells you what the original developer intended to happen. It doesn't tell you how the user actually interacts with the system today.

Manual discovery is equally painful. The industry average for manually documenting and recreating a single legacy screen is roughly 40 hours. When you are dealing with an enterprise suite of 500+ screens, the math simply doesn't work. This is why the average enterprise rewrite timeline stretches to 18-24 months—a timeframe in which the business requirements usually change, ensuring the project is obsolete before it's even shipped.

Why Visual Reverse Engineering is the Paradigm Shift#

Visual Reverse Engineering, the core technology behind Replay, flips the script. Instead of starting with the "black box" of the source code, we start with the user interface.

By recording real user workflows, Replay captures the DOM state, network calls, and state transitions in real-time. This "Video as Source of Truth" approach allows us to see exactly what is being rendered and why. We aren't guessing what a function does; we are observing its output and its impact on the user experience.

Comparing Modernization Methodologies#

💰 ROI Insight: By moving from manual documentation to automated visual extraction, enterprises typically see a 70% time saving. What used to take 40 hours per screen is reduced to 4 hours of automated refinement.

From Black Box to Documented React Components#

When we go beyond code analysis, we stop treating the legacy system as a set of files and start treating it as a set of behaviors. Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recorded sessions to identify patterns, components, and data structures.

The result isn't just a screenshot; it's a fully functional, modern React component that mirrors the legacy behavior but uses modern best practices (Tailwind CSS, TypeScript, and functional components).

Example: Generated Component Extraction#

Below is an example of what Replay generates after analyzing a legacy insurance claims portal. Note how it abstracts the business logic while maintaining the functional requirements of the original system.

typescript
// Generated by Replay Visual Extraction
// Source: Legacy Claims Portal v4.2 (COBOL/JSP)
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { Button, Input, Card } from '@/components/ui-library';
import { validateClaimId } from '@/lib/legacy-bridge';

export const ClaimSubmissionForm = ({ userSession }: { userSession: any }) => {
  const [isSubmitting, setIsSubmitting] = useState(false);
  const [formData, setFormData] = useState({
    claimId: '',
    policyNumber: '',
    incidentDate: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0]
  });

  // Replay preserved the specific validation logic found during runtime
  const handleSubmit = async (e: React.FormEvent) => {
    e.preventDefault();
    setIsSubmitting(true);
    try {
      const response = await fetch('/api/v1/claims/process', {
        method: 'POST',
        body: JSON.stringify(formData),
      });
      // Logic inferred from network capture during recording
      if (response.ok) {
        window.notify('Claim processed successfully');
      }
    } catch (err) {
      console.error('Legacy bridge failure', err);
    } finally {
      setIsSubmitting(false);
    }
  };

  return (
    <Card title="Submit New Claim">
      <form onSubmit={handleSubmit} className="space-y-4">
        <Input 
          label="Claim ID" 
          value={formData.claimId} 
          onChange={(v) => setFormData({...formData, claimId: v})} 
        />
        {/* Component mapped to Design System automatically */}
        <Button type="submit" loading={isSubmitting}>
          Process Transaction
        </Button>
      </form>
    </Card>
  );
};

The Replay Architecture: Library, Flows, and Blueprints#

To handle the complexity of industries like Financial Services or Healthcare, a simple "screen-to-code" tool isn't enough. We need a structured architectural approach. Replay organizes the reverse-engineering process into three distinct layers:

1. The Library (Design System Alignment)#

Most legacy systems have inconsistent UI. One screen uses a blue button, another uses a grey one. Replay’s Library feature identifies these UI patterns across all recordings and maps them to a single, unified Design System. Instead of generating 50 different button components, it identifies the "Atomic" intent and maps it to your modern component library.

2. Flows (Business Logic Mapping)#

Code analysis often fails to show how a user moves through a multi-step process (e.g., a mortgage application). Replay’s Flows feature visualizes the state machine of the application. It documents every "if-this-then-that" scenario based on actual user behavior, generating comprehensive documentation and E2E tests (Playwright/Cypress) automatically.

3. Blueprints (The Editor)#

The Blueprints environment is where architects refine the extracted logic. It provides a visual interface to tweak the generated API contracts and ensure the new React frontend communicates perfectly with existing backend services or new microservices.

⚠️ Warning: Don't attempt to modernize the backend and frontend simultaneously without a clear API contract. Replay generates these contracts automatically from network traffic, preventing "integration hell" later in the project.

Step-by-Step: The Visual Reverse Engineering Process#

Modernizing with Replay follows a structured, repeatable four-step process that eliminates the ambiguity of traditional rewrites.

Step 1: Recording and Observation#

Users or QA testers perform standard workflows within the legacy application while the Replay recorder is active. This captures the DOM, network calls, and console logs. We aren't looking at the source code; we are looking at the rendered reality.

Step 2: AI-Powered Extraction#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite processes the recording. It identifies:

• •Input fields and their validation rules.
• •Data structures returned by legacy APIs.
• •Component boundaries (e.g., "This is a Header," "This is a Data Grid").
• •Technical debt hotspots (e.g., "This screen makes 42 redundant API calls").

Step 3: Architecture Mapping#

Architects use the Blueprints editor to map the extracted components to the target architecture. This is where you decide which legacy API calls should be consolidated or replaced by a new GraphQL layer.

Step 4: Code Generation and E2E Testing#

Replay generates the React code, TypeScript definitions, and API contracts. Crucially, it also generates E2E tests that compare the legacy system's output with the new system's output to ensure 1:1 functional parity.

typescript
// Example: Automatically generated API Contract from Replay extraction
// This ensures the new frontend matches the legacy backend expectations exactly.

export interface LegacyClaimResponse {
  /** Map to legacy 'CLM_ID_001' field */
  claimId: string;
  /** Map to legacy 'STS_CD' field */
  status: 'PENDING' | 'APPROVED' | 'DENIED';
  /** ISO Date extracted from legacy timestamp format */
  processedAt: string;
  metadata: {
    originatingSystem: string;
    version: number;
  };
}

Built for Regulated Environments#

For Enterprise Architects in Government, Healthcare, or Telecom, "cloud-only" is often a non-starter. Modernization tools must respect the same security boundaries as the systems they are replacing.

Replay is built with a "Security-First" mindset:

• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Data handling practices meet the highest standards for sensitive information.
• •On-Premise Availability: Run the entire extraction engine within your own VPC or data center.
• •PII Masking: Automatically redact sensitive user data during the recording process so that no actual customer data ever reaches the AI engine.

📝 Note: In highly regulated industries, the "Documentation Gap" isn't just a productivity issue—it's a compliance risk. Replay’s ability to generate "Technical Debt Audits" and "Functional Documentation" on the fly provides a paper trail that manual efforts can't match.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take?#

While a manual rewrite takes 18-24 months, a Replay-driven modernization typically takes 2-8 weeks for the initial extraction and documentation of a complex module. The total timeline depends on the desired level of refactoring, but the "Discovery" phase is virtually eliminated.

What about business logic preservation?#

Static analysis often misses logic hidden in the database or external services. Because Replay records the results of that logic (the data that actually reaches the UI), we preserve the functional outcome. If the legacy system shows a specific error message under a specific condition, Replay captures that behavior and ensures the new component replicates it.

Does this replace my developers?#

No. Replay replaces the "grunt work" of modernization—writing boilerplate, documenting old screens, and mapping CSS. It frees your Senior Engineers to focus on high-value tasks: designing the new microservices architecture, improving performance, and building new features that the business actually needs.

Can Replay handle mainframe or "green screen" applications?#

If the application has a web-based entry point (even a terminal emulator in a browser), Replay can extract it. For thick-client desktop apps, we recommend using a web-bridge or VDI approach to capture the UI stream.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.