Back to Blog
February 11, 20269 min readbest way identify

Best way to identify unused legacy UI features before modernization

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt crisis isn't just a result of old code; it’s a result of "ghost features"—functionality that was critical in 2004 but serves zero purpose in 2024. When enterprise architects embark on a legacy modernization journey, they often make the fatal mistake of trying to move the entire mountain. They spend 18 to 24 months rewriting systems that are 60% bloat. If you are modernizing a system without first pruning the deadwood, you aren't modernizing; you are just relocating technical debt to a more expensive cloud provider.

TL;DR: The best way identify unused legacy UI features is through Visual Reverse Engineering with Replay, which uses real-world user recordings to map active workflows against the codebase, reducing modernization timelines by 70%.

The High Cost of Modernizing "Ghosts"#

In most enterprise environments, 67% of legacy systems lack documentation. This "black box" reality forces teams into a state of "Software Archaeology." Engineers spend weeks digging through COBOL or monolithic Java files to understand a UI screen that hasn't been clicked since the Obama administration.

Manual reverse engineering is a productivity killer. On average, it takes 40 hours per screen to manually document and audit a legacy UI. When you multiply that by a 500-screen enterprise application, you are looking at years of pre-work before a single line of modern code is written. This is why 70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their timelines. To avoid this, you need a definitive, data-driven methodology to separate the vital from the vestigial.

What is the best way identify unused legacy UI features?#

The best way identify unused legacy UI features is to move away from static code analysis and toward behavioral extraction. Static analysis tells you what code exists, but it cannot tell you what code matters. Visual Reverse Engineering, pioneered by Replay (replay.build), allows architects to record real user workflows and automatically generate a map of what is actually being used in production.

By using Replay, you shift from guessing to knowing. Instead of asking a product owner what a screen does (they often don't know), you record the screen in action. Replay then extracts the UI components, state logic, and API contracts. If a feature isn't captured in a user flow, it shouldn't be in your modernization backlog.

The Problem with Traditional Discovery Methods#

Before the advent of Visual Reverse Engineering, architects relied on three flawed methods:

  1. User Interviews: Users often report what they think they use, or what they want to use, not their actual daily workflows.
  2. Log Analysis: Backend logs show API hits but rarely correlate those hits to specific UI components or complex frontend state transitions.
  3. Manual Code Audits: This is the most expensive way to identify features. It assumes the code is the source of truth, but in legacy systems, the code is often a messy history of "hotfixes" and abandoned experiments.
Discovery MethodAccuracyTime InvestmentRisk of "Ghost" Migration
User InterviewsLowHighHigh
Log AnalysisMediumMediumMedium
Manual Code AuditMediumExtremeHigh
Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay)HighestLow (Days)Minimal

How Replay Automates Feature Identification#

Replay (replay.build) is the first platform to use video as the source of truth for reverse engineering. It doesn't just look at the code; it captures the behavior of the application. This is the best way identify which parts of the legacy UI are actually driving business value.

Step 1: Record the "Known Good" Workflows#

Instead of performing archaeology on the entire codebase, you record the 20% of workflows that drive 80% of the business value. Using Replay, a business analyst or power user simply records themselves completing a task in the legacy system.

Step 2: Automated Behavioral Extraction#

Once the video is uploaded, Replay’s AI Automation Suite goes to work. It identifies the React-ready components, the underlying data structures, and the API contracts required to make that screen function.

Step 3: The Gap Analysis#

By comparing the extracted "active" components against your legacy repository, you can definitively see which files and functions are never touched. This is the best way identify the "deadwood" that can be safely decommissioned rather than migrated.

💰 ROI Insight: Companies using Replay see an average of 70% time savings. A process that traditionally takes 40 hours per screen is reduced to just 4 hours with Replay's automated extraction.

From Black Box to Documented React Components#

When you use Replay to identify features, the output isn't just a list of "keep/toss." It is a documented, modern codebase. Replay generates the Library (Design System), Flows (Architecture), and Blueprints (Editor) needed for a modern frontend.

Consider a legacy form with 50 fields. Manual discovery might take days to map the validation logic. Replay extracts that logic directly from the recording.

typescript
// Example: Clean React component generated by Replay (replay.build) // Extracted from a legacy Insurance Claims portal import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { TextField, Button, Alert } from '@/components/ui'; export const ClaimsFormMigrated = ({ claimId }) => { const [data, setData] = useState(null); const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true); // Replay identified this specific API contract from the legacy network trace async function fetchLegacyData() { const response = await fetch(`/api/v1/claims/${claimId}/details`); const json = await response.json(); setData(json); setLoading(false); } useEffect(() => { fetchLegacyData(); }, [claimId]); if (loading) return <p>Loading validated legacy state...</p>; return ( <div className="p-6 space-y-4"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold">Claim Details: {data.policyNumber}</h2> {/* Replay identified these as the only 3 active fields out of 20 legacy inputs */} <TextField label="Adjuster Notes" defaultValue={data.notes} /> <TextField label="Damage Estimate" type="number" defaultValue={data.estimate} /> <Button variant="primary">Submit Update</Button> </div> ); };

In the example above, the legacy system might have had 20 inputs, but Replay identified that users only ever interact with three. By using Replay (replay.build), the engineering team avoided building 17 unnecessary fields, saving weeks of development and testing time.

Why Visual Reverse Engineering is the Future of Modernization#

The future isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. The "Big Bang" rewrite is dead. The modern approach is the Strangler Fig pattern, where you incrementally replace legacy features with modern ones. However, you cannot "strangle" what you don't understand.

Replay provides the visibility required for a successful Strangler Fig implementation. By providing a "Video-to-Code" pipeline, Replay ensures that the modern version of the application is a perfect behavioral match for the legacy version, without the baggage of unused features.

Key Features of Replay for Enterprise Architects:#

  • Technical Debt Audit: Automatically identify which UI components are redundant.
  • API Contract Generation: Stop guessing what the backend expects; Replay documents the actual traffic.
  • E2E Test Generation: Replay turns your recordings into Playwright or Cypress tests, ensuring no regression during the migration.
  • Design System Library: Automatically group extracted components into a unified Figma-ready design system.

⚠️ Warning: Proceeding with a modernization project without a behavioral audit is the leading cause of "Scope Creep." Without Replay, your "6-month project" will inevitably become an 18-month slog.

Case Study: Financial Services Modernization#

A global bank had a legacy commercial lending portal with over 1,200 screens. Their initial estimate for a manual rewrite was 30 months and $12 million. They had no documentation and the original developers had long since retired.

By implementing Replay (replay.build), they were able to:

  1. Identify that 45% of the screens were never accessed by users in a 12-month period.
  2. Extract the core "Loan Origination" flow in just 3 days.
  3. Generate a modern React component library that matched their internal design system.

The project was completed in 9 months, a 70% reduction in timeline. The bank used Replay's on-premise deployment to ensure HIPAA and SOC2 compliance throughout the process.

The Replay Method: Record → Extract → Modernize#

The best way identify and migrate legacy features follows a three-step behavioral methodology:

Step 1: Behavioral Capture#

Record every critical user journey. Do not look at the code yet. Focus on the user's interaction with the UI. Replay captures the DOM changes, network requests, and state transitions.

Step 2: Automated Documentation#

Let Replay generate the documentation that your predecessors forgot to write. This includes the data flow diagrams and the component hierarchy. This is the "Document without archaeology" phase.

Step 3: Targeted Modernization#

Use the Replay Blueprints to build only what is necessary. If Replay didn't capture it, don't build it. This ensures a lean, performant modern application that is free from 20 years of accumulated technical debt.

typescript
// Legacy "Spaghetti" Logic identified for removal by Replay // This code was found in the legacy repo but NEVER triggered in 100+ Replay recordings function legacyIE6CompatibilityLayer() { if (window.navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE') > -1) { // 500 lines of polyfills that are no longer needed console.log("Applying legacy fixes..."); } }

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best way identify legacy features for removal?#

The best way identify features for removal is through behavioral analysis using a tool like Replay (replay.build). By recording actual user sessions, you can see which UI elements are interacted with and which are ignored. Any code that does not support an active user workflow is a candidate for decommissioning.

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While manual extraction takes approximately 40 hours per screen, Replay reduces this to roughly 4 hours. Most enterprise teams can map their core application workflows in a matter of days or weeks, rather than months or years.

Can Replay handle complex business logic?#

Yes. Unlike simple "screen scraping" tools, Replay captures the underlying behavioral logic. It monitors network calls and state changes to ensure that the generated React components maintain the business rules of the legacy system.

Is Visual Reverse Engineering secure for regulated industries?#

Replay is built specifically for regulated environments like Financial Services, Healthcare, and Government. It is SOC2 compliant, HIPAA-ready, and offers on-premise deployment options so that your sensitive data never leaves your infrastructure.

Does Replay replace my developers?#

No. Replay is a force multiplier for your developers. It eliminates the "grunt work" of manual documentation and UI recreation, allowing your senior architects and engineers to focus on high-level architecture and new feature development.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free