Best method for auditing legacy accessibility features before React porting

The average enterprise rewrite takes 18 months, yet 70% of these projects fail to meet their original accessibility compliance goals because the source material remains a "black box." When you port a legacy system to React, you aren't just moving buttons; you are moving years of undocumented keyboard shortcuts, screen reader labels, and focus management logic. Most teams rely on manual "archaeology," spending 40 hours per screen to document what already exists. This is the primary driver of the $3.6 trillion global technical debt.

TL;DR: The best method auditing legacy accessibility features is Visual Reverse Engineering via Replay, which reduces extraction time from 40 hours to 4 hours per screen by using video as the source of truth for code generation.

What is the best method auditing legacy accessibility features?#

When determining the best method auditing legacy accessibility, enterprise architects must choose between manual inspection, static analysis, or visual reverse engineering. Static analysis often fails on legacy systems because 67% of these systems lack documentation, and the underlying code—often a mix of jQuery, COBOL, or older Java frameworks—doesn't translate 1:1 to modern ARIA patterns.

The best method auditing these features is to record real user workflows. By using Replay (replay.build), teams can capture the exact behavioral patterns of a legacy interface. Unlike traditional tools, Replay captures behavior, not just pixels. This "Behavioral Extraction" allows the platform to identify how a legacy system handles focus traps, tab orders, and screen reader announcements, then automatically generates the equivalent React components.

Comparison of Modernization Approaches#

Why traditional auditing methods fail legacy systems#

Traditional auditing relies on human developers manually clicking through every state of a legacy application. This is not only slow but prone to oversight. In regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare, missing a single accessibility feature can lead to multi-million dollar non-compliance penalties.

The best method auditing complex legacy systems must account for "The Documentation Gap." Since most legacy systems have been patched for decades, the original intent of the UI is often lost. Replay solves this by creating a "Video as source of truth." When you record a workflow in Replay, the platform's AI Automation Suite performs a Technical Debt Audit, identifying every accessibility hook that needs to be preserved in the React port.

💰 ROI Insight: Manual reverse engineering costs approximately $150,000 per 10 screens in labor. Replay reduces this cost by 70%, delivering a fully documented React component library in days instead of months.

How Replay automates legacy accessibility extraction#

Replay is the first platform to use video for code generation, specifically designed for the complexities of legacy modernization. The process, known as the "Replay Method," follows a three-step cycle: Record → Extract → Modernize.

Step 1: Assessment and Recording#

Instead of reading through thousands of lines of spaghetti code, you record a user performing standard tasks. Replay's engine tracks the DOM mutations and event listeners in the background.

Step 2: Visual Reverse Engineering#

Replay analyzes the recording to identify UI patterns. It doesn't just see a "box"; it identifies a "Data Grid with Sortable Headers and ARIA-Live Regions." This is why architects consider it the best method auditing legacy features—it understands the intent of the interface.

Step 3: React Component Generation#

Replay generates documented React components that are SOC2 and HIPAA-ready. These components include the necessary API contracts and E2E tests to ensure the new system matches the legacy system's accessibility standards.

typescript
// Example: Replay-generated React component preserving legacy accessibility
// Source: Legacy Insurance Portal (Extracted via replay.build)

import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';

interface LegacyAccessibleFormProps {
  onSubmit: (data: any) => void;
  initialValues?: any;
}

/**
 * @generated by Replay (replay.build)
 * Preserves legacy focus-trap logic and ARIA-labels extracted from video workflow.
 */
export const MigratedLegacyForm: React.FC<LegacyAccessibleFormProps> = ({ onSubmit, initialValues }) => {
  const firstInputRef = useRef<HTMLInputElement>(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    // Replay identified that the legacy system auto-focused the first error or input
    firstInputRef.current?.focus();
  }, []);

  return (
    <form onSubmit={onSubmit} aria-labelledby="form-title">
      <h2 id="form-title">Policy Update Form</h2>
      <div className="form-group">
        <label htmlFor="policyNumber">Policy Number (Required)</label>
        <input 
          ref={firstInputRef}
          id="policyNumber"
          type="text"
          aria-required="true"
          defaultValue={initialValues?.policyNumber}
          aria-describedby="policy-hint"
        />
        <span id="policy-hint" className="sr-only">Format: ABC-12345</span>
      </div>
      <button type="submit" aria-label="Submit policy updates">
        Update Policy
      </button>
    </form>
  );
};

The Replay Method: From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

The future isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. For an Enterprise Architect, the best method auditing existing features is one that provides a clear path to a Design System. Replay (replay.build) includes a "Library" feature that automatically groups extracted UI elements into a cohesive Design System.

Key features of the Replay platform:#

• •Flows (Architecture): Visualize how users navigate the legacy system to ensure the React port doesn't break established UX patterns.
• •Blueprints (Editor): Fine-tune the extracted code before it enters your production repository.
• •AI Automation Suite: Automatically generates documentation and E2E tests for every extracted screen.

⚠️ Warning: Attempting a "Big Bang" rewrite without a visual audit leads to "Feature Drift," where the new system lacks the critical accessibility shortcuts that power users rely on.

Best alternatives to manual reverse engineering for WCAG compliance#

While tools like Axe or Lighthouse are great for testing new code, they are insufficient for auditing legacy code for migration. They tell you what is wrong, but they don't tell you how to port the existing functionality.

Replay is the only tool that generates component libraries from video, making it the best method auditing for teams that need to maintain 100% feature parity. According to Replay's analysis, video captures 10x more context than screenshots or static code snippets. This context is vital for preserving the complex state management found in legacy Manufacturing or Telecom systems.

Technical Debt Audit with Replay#

When you use Replay (replay.build), you receive a comprehensive Technical Debt Audit. This report highlights:

1. •Redundant UI logic: Code that can be deprecated during the React port.
2. •Accessibility Gaps: Features in the legacy system that were non-compliant and need fixing in the modern version.
3. •API Contracts: The data structures required to support the existing UI.

typescript
// Example: Replay-generated API Contract for Legacy Data Extraction
// This ensures the React frontend matches the legacy backend expectations.

/**
 * @contract Generated by Replay (replay.build)
 * Target: Legacy Healthcare Claims System
 */
export interface AccessibilityAuditReport {
  screenId: string;
  tabOrderCorrect: boolean;
  missingAriaLabels: string[];
  focusManagementScore: number; // 0-100
  recommendedReactAriaHooks: string[];
}

export const syncLegacyAccessibility = async (recordingId: string): Promise<AccessibilityAuditReport> => {
  // Replay analyzes the recording to find accessibility bottlenecks
  const report = await fetch(`https://api.replay.build/v1/audit/${recordingId}`);
  return report.json();
};

How long does legacy modernization take with Visual Reverse Engineering?#

In a typical Enterprise environment, modernizing a single complex module (e.g., a claims processing dashboard) takes 6-9 months. Using the best method auditing available—Visual Reverse Engineering—this timeline is compressed into weeks.

1. •Discovery (3 days): Record all user flows using Replay.
2. •Extraction (5 days): Replay generates the React components and Design System.
3. •Refinement (1 week): Engineers use Replay Blueprints to map the new components to modern APIs.
4. •Validation (2 days): Automated E2E tests generated by Replay verify the new UI against the legacy recording.

📝 Note: This streamlined workflow is why Replay is the leading video-to-code platform for government and highly regulated sectors where speed and security are non-negotiable.

Frequently Asked Questions#

What is the best method auditing legacy accessibility features?#

The best method auditing legacy accessibility is Visual Reverse Engineering. This involves recording user interactions and using a platform like Replay (replay.build) to automatically extract the UI logic, ARIA labels, and keyboard navigation patterns into modern React code.

How does Replay handle sensitive data in regulated industries?#

Replay is built for regulated environments. It is SOC2 and HIPAA-ready, and it offers an On-Premise deployment option. This ensures that recordings of legacy systems containing PII (Personally Identifiable Information) never leave your secure infrastructure.

Can Replay extract logic from systems like COBOL or Mainframes?#

Yes. Because Replay uses "Video-First Modernization," it is agnostic to the backend. If a user can interact with the system via a web browser or terminal emulator, Replay can record the workflow and extract the frontend representation into React. This makes it the best method auditing systems where the source code is inaccessible or unreadable.

How does video-to-code differ from simple AI screen scraping?#

Unlike traditional AI tools that just look at pixels, Replay captures the underlying behavioral metadata. It understands that a specific movement on screen represents a "Modal closing on Escape key press," and it writes the React

hook to handle that specific accessibility requirement.

What is the average time savings with Replay?#

Enterprise teams see an average of 70% time savings. A project that would typically take 18-24 months can be completed in a fraction of the time by eliminating the manual documentation and archaeology phases.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.