Back to Blog
February 10, 20269 min readapplication portfolio rationalization

Application Portfolio Rationalization: Saving 20% on Licensing Fees

R
Replay Team
Developer Advocates

70% of legacy rewrites fail or exceed their original timeline. Most CTOs are currently sitting on a $3.6 trillion technical debt mountain, paying millions in annual licensing fees for "zombie" applications that no one in the organization fully understands. This isn't just an engineering problem; it’s a massive financial leak.

The traditional approach to application portfolio rationalization—manual documentation, months of "archaeology" through undocumented codebases, and high-risk "Big Bang" rewrites—is fundamentally broken. When 67% of legacy systems lack any meaningful documentation, your architects aren't building the future; they are historians trying to decipher the past.

TL;DR: Application portfolio rationalization fails because of documentation gaps, but Visual Reverse Engineering via Replay can reduce modernization timelines from 18 months to weeks, yielding an immediate 20% reduction in licensing fees by identifying and consolidating redundant legacy assets.

The High Cost of "Black Box" Engineering#

Enterprise architecture in regulated industries like Financial Services and Healthcare often resembles a geological dig. You have layers of COBOL, Java monoliths, and early-2000s .NET applications stacked on top of each other. Because the original developers are long gone, these systems become "Black Boxes."

The fear of breaking a critical business process leads to "License Bloat." Organizations keep paying for legacy IBM, Oracle, or SAP licenses simply because they don't know exactly what business logic is buried inside those screens.

The Manual Rationalization Tax#

Manual reverse engineering is a productivity killer. On average, it takes 40 hours of senior engineering time to manually document and reconstruct a single complex legacy screen. In a typical enterprise portfolio of 500+ screens, that’s 20,000 hours of manual labor before a single line of modern code is even written.

💰 ROI Insight: By moving from manual "archaeology" to automated visual extraction with Replay, the time per screen drops from 40 hours to just 4 hours. This 90% efficiency gain is the difference between a successful rationalization project and a multi-million dollar write-off.

Why Traditional Application Portfolio Rationalization Strategies Fail#

Most Enterprise Architects choose between three traditional paths, all of which carry significant risk:

ApproachTimelineRiskLicensing Impact
Big Bang Rewrite18-24 monthsHigh (70% fail)Double-pay during transition
Strangler Fig12-18 monthsMediumSlow reduction of fees
Lift and Shift3-6 monthsLowNo change (often increases cost)
Visual Reverse Engineering (Replay)2-8 weeksLowImmediate 20%+ reduction

The "Big Bang" fails because business requirements change faster than the rewrite can finish. "Lift and Shift" simply moves the technical debt to the cloud, where it often becomes more expensive due to consumption-based pricing on inefficient legacy code.

Visual Reverse Engineering: The Future of Rationalization#

The future isn't rewriting from scratch—it's understanding what you already have. Replay introduces a paradigm shift: using video as the source of truth for reverse engineering. Instead of reading 100,000 lines of undocumented code, you record a real user workflow. Replay then extracts the UI components, the business logic, and the API contracts automatically.

Moving from Black Box to Documented Codebase#

When you record a workflow in Replay, the platform doesn't just "see" pixels; it understands the underlying intent. It generates:

  1. Modern React Components: Clean, documented code that matches your design system.
  2. API Contracts: Clear definitions of how the frontend talks to the backend.
  3. E2E Tests: Automated tests that ensure the modern version behaves exactly like the legacy version.
typescript
// Example: Replay-generated component from a legacy insurance claims screen // This replaces 15-year-old JSP code with a modern, typed React component import React, { useState } from 'react'; import { Button, TextField, Card } from '@/components/ui'; interface ClaimData { claimId: string; policyNumber: string; status: 'PENDING' | 'APPROVED' | 'REJECTED'; } export const LegacyClaimMigrated: React.FC<{ initialData: ClaimData }> = ({ initialData }) => { const [claim, setClaim] = useState<ClaimData>(initialData); // Business logic preserved: Validation rules extracted from legacy user flow const handleApprove = async () => { if (claim.policyNumber.startsWith('POL-')) { // API Contract automatically generated by Replay await api.claims.updateStatus(claim.claimId, 'APPROVED'); } }; return ( <Card title={`Claim: ${claim.claimId}`}> <TextField label="Policy Number" value={claim.policyNumber} readOnly /> <Button onClick={handleApprove} variant="primary">Approve Claim</Button> </Card> ); };

A 4-Step Framework for Application Portfolio Rationalization#

To achieve a 20% saving on licensing fees, you must move systematically. Here is how to use Replay to accelerate this process.

Step 1: Inventory and Audit#

Use Replay’s Technical Debt Audit feature to scan your portfolio. Identify which applications are redundant. Often, three different departments are paying for three different tools that perform the same function (e.g., document intake or customer lookup).

Step 2: Visual Recording#

Instead of hiring consultants to interview users, have the users record their actual daily workflows using Replay. This captures the "unwritten rules" of the business logic—the edge cases that never made it into the (now non-existent) documentation.

Step 3: Automated Extraction#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite processes the recordings. It identifies common UI patterns across different legacy applications. This allows you to build a unified Library (Design System).

💡 Pro Tip: Look for "UI Collision." If five different legacy apps use five different versions of a "Customer Search" grid, consolidate them into one modern React component in your Replay Library. This is where the licensing savings start to compound.

Step 4: Component Consolidation#

By extracting the core logic into modern Blueprints, you can begin shutting down the legacy servers. This is the "Strangler Fig" approach on steroids. Instead of replacing the whole monolith, you replace the most expensive licensed components first.

⚠️ Warning: Do not attempt to rationalize without a verified API contract. Replay generates these contracts automatically from the network traffic of your recordings, ensuring the new frontend won't break the old backend.

Case Study: Financial Services Rationalization#

A Tier-1 bank was spending $45M annually on licensing for a suite of legacy wealth management tools. 67% of these systems had no documentation. Their projected timeline for a manual rewrite was 24 months.

By using Replay, they:

  • Recorded 400+ user workflows across 12 different legacy applications.
  • Identified that 30% of the features were redundant and could be consolidated into a single modern dashboard.
  • Extracted 150+ reusable React components into a central Library.
  • Result: They decommissioned 4 legacy platforms in 6 months, saving $9M in licensing fees (20% of their spend) and reducing their technical debt by 40%.

Technical Debt and the "Archaeology" Problem#

The $3.6 trillion global technical debt isn't just a number; it's a drag on innovation. When your best engineers are spent doing "archaeology"—digging through old code to find out why a button works the way it does—they aren't building new features that drive revenue.

Replay turns "archaeology" into "extraction."

typescript
// Replay-generated API Contract (OpenAPI/Swagger compatible) // Extracted from legacy SOAP/XML traffic during user recording export const ClaimServiceContract = { path: "/api/v1/claims/process", method: "POST", requestSchema: { type: "object", properties: { userId: { type: "string" }, claimAmount: { type: "number", minimum: 0 }, evidenceUrls: { type: "array", items: { type: "string" } } }, required: ["userId", "claimAmount"] }, responseSchema: { // ... automatically mapped from legacy response } };

By generating these contracts, Replay allows you to decouple the frontend from the legacy backend. You can move the UI to a modern React stack while the backend rationalization happens in the background. This "decoupled modernization" is the safest way to execute application portfolio rationalization.

Security and Compliance in Regulated Environments#

For industries like Government or Telecom, data privacy is non-negotiable. Replay is built for these high-stakes environments:

  • SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: Ensures that sensitive user data recorded during extraction is handled according to federal standards.
  • On-Premise Availability: For organizations that cannot use the cloud, Replay can be deployed entirely within your own firewall.
  • PII Masking: Automatically detects and masks sensitive information in recordings before they are processed for extraction.

The ROI of Understanding#

If you don't understand your portfolio, you can't rationalize it. Manual audits are outdated the moment they are finished. Replay provides a living, visual map of your architecture.

  • 70% average time savings compared to manual rewrites.
  • 18-24 months reduced to weeks for the discovery phase.
  • Visual Source of Truth: Anyone from a Product Manager to a Lead Architect can watch a Flow in Replay and understand the business logic.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does application portfolio rationalization save on licensing fees?#

Rationalization identifies redundant applications that perform similar functions. By consolidating these into a single modern platform using Replay's component extraction, organizations can decommission legacy software and stop paying the associated maintenance and licensing fees. Typically, this results in a 20-30% reduction in Opex.

Can Replay handle extremely old legacy systems (e.g., Mainframe/Green Screens)?#

Yes. Because Replay uses Visual Reverse Engineering, it focuses on the user interface and the network layer. If a user can interact with it on a screen, Replay can record the workflow, document the logic, and help extract the requirements into modern React components and API contracts.

What is the risk of losing business logic during extraction?#

Replay mitigates this risk by using the recording as the "source of truth." Unlike manual documentation where a developer might miss an edge case, Replay captures the actual execution of the logic. Furthermore, Replay generates E2E tests based on the legacy recording to ensure the new component behaves exactly like the old one.

How does this fit into a "Cloud Native" strategy?#

Application portfolio rationalization is often the first step in a cloud migration. By rationalizing the portfolio first, you ensure you aren't "lifting and shifting" waste. Replay helps you transform legacy monoliths into cloud-ready micro-frontends and services.

How long does a typical Replay pilot take?#

A standard pilot can document and extract a complex legacy workflow into modern React components in as little as 3-5 days. This compares to the 4-6 weeks usually required for manual discovery and prototyping.


Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.

Ready to try Replay?

Transform any video recording into working code with AI-powered behavior reconstruction.

Launch Replay Free