Aerospace Legacy Software: Modernizing High-Stakes Systems Safely

The most dangerous code in the world isn't a new virus; it's the 30-year-old undocumented software currently managing flight telemetry, satellite communications, or ground control systems. In the aerospace industry, "legacy" isn't just a technical term—it's a liability. With a global technical debt mountain reaching $3.6 trillion, aerospace firms are sitting on a powder keg of aging COBOL, Fortran, and monolithic C++ systems that no one living truly understands.

TL;DR: Modernizing aerospace legacy software requires moving away from manual "code archaeology" toward visual reverse engineering to eliminate the 70% failure rate of traditional big-bang rewrites.

The High Cost of the "Black Box"#

For decades, the aerospace sector has operated under the mantra: "If it isn't broken, don't touch it." This philosophy has created a massive documentation gap. Statistics show that 67% of legacy systems lack any form of accurate documentation. In a regulated environment where every line of code must be accounted for to meet FAA or EASA standards, this lack of visibility is a catastrophic risk.

When organizations decide to modernize, they typically fall into the trap of the "Big Bang" rewrite. They spend 18–24 months and millions of dollars trying to replicate functionality that was never properly documented in the first place. The result? 70% of these legacy rewrites fail or significantly exceed their timelines.

The Modernization Matrix: Risk vs. Reality#

Why Manual Archaeology is Killing Your Budget#

The traditional method of modernization involves hiring "code archaeologists"—expensive consultants who spend months reading through spaghetti code to understand business logic. In the aerospace world, this is even more complex due to the intricate physics and mathematical models embedded in the software.

On average, it takes 40 hours to manually document and reconstruct a single complex legacy screen. When you consider an enterprise aerospace application might have 500+ screens, the math becomes impossible. You are looking at 20,000 man-hours just to understand what you have before a single line of new code is written.

Replay flips this script. By recording real user workflows, we reduce that 40-hour window to just 4 hours per screen. We don't start with the code; we start with the truth of how the system is actually used.

⚠️ Warning: Relying on original source code as your "Source of Truth" is a fallacy. In systems over 10 years old, the "as-built" code rarely matches the "as-operated" reality due to decades of hotfixes and undocumented patches.

The Visual Reverse Engineering Framework#

To modernize Aerospace Legacy Software without risking mission-critical failures, we advocate for a three-stage visual extraction process. This moves the project from a "black box" to a fully documented, modern React-based architecture in weeks, not years.

Step 1: Workflow Recording (The Truth Phase)#

Instead of reading 50,000 lines of Fortran, an engineer or subject matter expert (SME) simply performs their standard operational tasks while Replay records the session. This captures every state change, every API call, and every UI transition.

Step 2: Automated Extraction (The Blueprint Phase)#

Replay’s AI Automation Suite analyzes the recording. It identifies the underlying patterns, business logic, and data structures. It then generates:

• •API Contracts: Defining exactly how the legacy system talks to the backend.
• •E2E Tests: Creating a safety net that ensures the new system behaves identically to the old one.
• •Technical Debt Audit: Identifying which parts of the legacy logic are redundant.

Step 3: Component Generation (The Modernization Phase)#

Replay generates documented React components and a centralized Design System (Library). This isn't "garbage-in, garbage-out" code; it's clean, modular, and ready for a modern CI/CD pipeline.

typescript
// Example: Generated Telemetry Dashboard Component from Replay Extraction
// This component preserves the legacy business logic for altitude calculation
// while providing a modern, performant React interface.

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { TelemetryStream, AltitudeGauge } from '@aerospace/design-system';

interface TelemetryData {
  rawAltitude: number;
  pressureHpa: number;
  timestamp: string;
}

export const FlightDataMonitor: React.FC = () => {
  const [data, setData] = useState<TelemetryData | null>(null);

  // Logic extracted from legacy C++ telemetry module
  const calculateCorrectedAltitude = (raw: number, pressure: number) => {
    const seaLevelPressure = 1013.25;
    return raw * (pressure / seaLevelPressure);
  };

  return (
    <div className="p-6 bg-slate-900 text-white rounded-lg">
      <h2 className="text-xl font-bold mb-4">Real-time Flight Telemetry</h2>
      {data ? (
        <AltitudeGauge 
          value={calculateCorrectedAltitude(data.rawAltitude, data.pressureHpa)} 
          unit="ft"
        />
      ) : (
        <p>Awaiting data stream...</p>
      )}
    </div>
  );
};

Preserving Business Logic in Regulated Environments#

In aerospace, the "How" is just as important as the "What." You cannot simply replace a flight-path calculation engine because it "looks old." You must prove that the new engine produces the exact same outputs as the validated legacy version.

This is where Replay's Blueprints become invaluable. By using video as the source of truth, you create a visual audit trail. If a regulator asks why a specific component behaves a certain way, you can point to the original recording of the legacy system.

💰 ROI Insight: Companies using Replay see an average 70% time savings on their modernization projects. For an aerospace firm, this can mean moving a decommissioning date up by 18 months, saving millions in maintenance fees for obsolete hardware.

Security and Compliance: Built for the Hangar#

We understand that aerospace data is often sensitive, classified, or subject to ITAR/EAR regulations. Unlike "black box" AI tools that require cloud access, Replay is built for high-security environments.

• •On-Premise Availability: Run the entire extraction suite on your own secure servers.
• •SOC2 & HIPAA Ready: While HIPAA is healthcare-specific, the same rigorous data handling standards apply to our aerospace deployments.
• •No Data Leakage: Your proprietary business logic and flight data never leave your perimeter.

Technical Debt Audit: The Silent Killer#

One of the biggest risks in Aerospace Legacy Software is "Ghost Logic"—code that exists but no longer serves a purpose, or worse, code that triggers unexpected side effects. Replay’s Technical Debt Audit analyzes the recording against the codebase to identify:

1. •Dead Code: Logic that is never triggered during actual user workflows.
2. •Redundant Paths: Multiple ways of achieving the same result that can be consolidated.
3. •Security Vulnerabilities: Legacy protocols that are no longer compliant with modern cybersecurity standards.

json
// Example: Replay Technical Debt Audit Output (Simplified)
{
  "screen": "GroundControl_Main",
  "redundancy_score": 0.42,
  "dead_logic_blocks": [
    "handleLegacySerialPortV1",
    "calculateFuelLoad_1994_Standard"
  ],
  "api_contract_mismatch": [
    {
      "endpoint": "/api/v1/telemetry",
      "issue": "Returns 14 unused fields, increasing latency by 200ms"
    }
  ]
}

The Future Isn't Rewriting—It's Understanding#

The industry is shifting. The era of the 24-month "Big Bang" rewrite is over. The risks are too high, and the talent pool of developers who understand 40-year-old systems is shrinking every day.

The future of aerospace software isn't about throwing away the past; it's about using Visual Reverse Engineering to bridge the gap between legacy reliability and modern agility. With Replay, you aren't just guessing what your software does—you are seeing it, documenting it, and transforming it in real-time.

💡 Pro Tip: Start your modernization journey with a "High-Value, Low-Complexity" screen. Use Replay to extract it in a single afternoon. This provides an immediate proof-of-concept for stakeholders and proves the 10x speed increase over manual methods.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How long does legacy extraction take with Replay?#

While a manual rewrite takes 18-24 months, Replay typically completes the extraction and documentation phase in 2-8 weeks. The actual "recording" of a screen takes minutes; the AI generation of components and tests takes hours.

What about business logic preservation?#

This is our core strength. Because Replay records the actual execution of the logic through the UI and API layers, we capture the "as-run" business logic. This is then generated into modern code or API contracts, ensuring 100% functional parity with the legacy system.

Does Replay support air-gapped environments?#

Yes. We offer a full On-Premise deployment model specifically for aerospace, defense, and government sectors where cloud connectivity is not an option.

Can Replay handle non-web legacy systems?#

Yes. Through our Flow capture technology, we can record workflows from various interface types and translate them into modern React components and standardized API structures.

What is the primary benefit for Enterprise Architects?#

Replay provides an instant, accurate architecture map. Instead of spending months drawing diagrams that are out of date by the time they are finished, architects get a living, visual representation of their system's "Flows" and "Blueprints."

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.