85. Reducing Customer Support Tickets by Modernizing Legacy UI

Every time a customer encounters an unhandled exception or an opaque "System Error" in your 15-year-old legacy portal, it costs your organization an average of $22 per ticket in direct labor. Multiply that by 5,000 monthly tickets, and you are burning $1.3 million a year just to manage the friction caused by an obsolete interface.

Reducing customer support tickets isn't just a UX goal; it’s a massive operational efficiency play. The problem is that most legacy systems are "black boxes." The original developers are gone, the documentation is non-existent (67% of legacy systems lack any useful documentation), and the business logic is buried under layers of spaghetti code. When you can’t understand the system, you can’t fix the UI. When you can’t fix the UI, the support tickets keep piling up.

TL;DR: Modernizing legacy UI through Visual Reverse Engineering reduces support volume by up to 40% by replacing brittle, undocumented interfaces with modern React components without the 18-month risk of a "Big Bang" rewrite.

The Support-Debt Loop: Why Legacy UI Kills Margins#

The global technical debt crisis has reached a staggering $3.6 trillion. For the Enterprise Architect, this debt manifests most visibly in the customer support queue. Legacy systems—often built on Silverlight, Flex, or early ASP.NET—suffer from "silent failures." These are states where the UI doesn't crash, but the user cannot complete their task because of an edge case the original team didn't anticipate in 2008.

Traditional modernization attempts usually fall into two traps:

1. •The Big Bang Rewrite: A high-risk, 18-24 month project that has a 70% failure rate. By the time it launches, the business requirements have changed.
2. •The "Lipstick on a Pig" Approach: Adding a modern CSS layer over legacy HTML. This fixes the look but leaves the underlying brittle logic intact, leading to the same support tickets.

Comparing Modernization Strategies#

💰 ROI Insight: Manual reverse engineering takes approximately 40 hours per screen to document and recreate. With Replay, this is reduced to 4 hours per screen—a 90% reduction in engineering overhead.

Reducing Customer Support Tickets Through Componentization#

The primary driver of support tickets in legacy environments is user confusion. Modernizing the UI allows for the implementation of real-time validation, better error handling, and intuitive flows. However, you cannot build a modern React-based UI if you don't know what the legacy API contracts look like.

Replay breaks this cycle by using "Video as the Source of Truth." Instead of digging through thousands of lines of COBOL or legacy Java, you record a real user workflow. Replay’s engine then extracts the DOM structure, state changes, and API interactions to generate documented React components.

From Black Box to Documented Codebase#

When we talk about reducing customer support tickets, we are really talking about visibility. If your support team can’t see why a user is stuck, they can’t help effectively. Replay generates the "Blueprints" (Architecture) and "Flows" (User Journeys) automatically.

typescript
// Example: A generated React component from a Replay extraction
// This component preserves legacy business logic while providing a modern UI
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
import { LegacyBridge } from '@replay/core';

export const ModernizedClaimsForm = ({ claimId }) => {
  const [status, setStatus] = useState('idle');
  const [data, setData] = useState(null);

  // Replay extracted this contract from the legacy network trace
  const handleSubmit = async (formData: any) => {
    setStatus('submitting');
    try {
      // Bridging to legacy SOAP/REST endpoint identified during extraction
      const response = await LegacyBridge.call('SubmitClaim_v2', formData);
      if (response.success) {
        setStatus('success');
      }
    } catch (error) {
      // Modern error handling reduces support tickets by explaining the 'why'
      console.error("Legacy System Error:", error);
      setStatus('error');
    }
  };

  return (
    <div className="modern-ui-container">
      <h3>Claim Submission: {claimId}</h3>
      {/* Modern validation prevents bad data from hitting the legacy DB */}
      <ValidationWrapper onSave={handleSubmit}>
        <LegacyFormFields data={data} />
      </ValidationWrapper>
    </div>
  );
};

The 3-Step Framework for Reducing Support Tickets#

To effectively reduce support volume, you must identify the high-friction screens and modernize them first. Here is the architectural workflow we recommend at Replay.

Step 1: Technical Debt Audit & Heatmapping#

Identify which screens correlate with the highest volume of support tickets. In most enterprise systems, 20% of the screens cause 80% of the support volume. Use Replay’s Technical Debt Audit feature to scan your legacy application and map out the complexity of these high-traffic areas.

Step 2: Visual Recording and Extraction#

Instead of "archaeology" (reading old code), have a subject matter expert (SME) record the ideal path through the high-friction workflow. Replay captures:

• •The exact DOM state at every interaction.
• •The API payloads and response headers.
• •The state transitions that lead to common "stuck" points.

⚠️ Warning: Do not attempt to fix business logic during extraction. The goal is to capture the current state perfectly so you can wrap it in a modern interface.

Step 3: Generating the Modern UI Library#

Replay takes the recording and generates a documented React component library. This includes:

• •API Contracts: Automatically generated TypeScript interfaces for the legacy backend.
• •E2E Tests: Generated Playwright or Cypress tests based on the recorded user flow.
• •React Components: Clean, modular code that reflects the legacy functionality but uses your modern design system.

💡 Pro Tip: Use Replay’s AI Automation Suite to automatically suggest UI improvements (like adding tooltips or inline validation) that directly address the reasons users file support tickets.

Real-World Implementation: Financial Services Case Study#

A Tier-1 bank was facing a massive influx of support tickets related to their internal loan processing system. The legacy UI was a complex grid built in 2011 that frequently timed out without telling the user why.

The Problem:

• •Average rewrite estimate: 18 months.
• •Documentation: Last updated in 2014.
• •Support tickets: 1,200/month specifically for "system timeout" errors.

The Replay Solution: The team used Replay to record the loan processing workflow. In 72 hours, Replay extracted the underlying API logic and generated a React-based "Strangler" UI. This new UI included a modern "loading" state and a retry mechanism that the legacy system lacked.

The Result:

• •Timeline: 3 weeks from extraction to production.
• •Support Reduction: Support tickets for this workflow dropped by 62% in the first month.
• •Engineering Savings: Saved an estimated 1,400 hours of manual documentation and coding.

Why "Video as Source of Truth" is the Future#

The biggest hurdle in reducing customer support tickets is the "Information Gap." Developers don't know how users use the system, and users don't know why the system is failing.

By using Replay to record workflows, you create a living document. If a user finds a new way to break the system, you record it, and Replay updates the documentation and the test suite automatically. This moves your engineering team from a reactive "fix-it" mode to a proactive "modernization" mode.

• •Library (Design System): Centralize your modernized components so they can be reused across the enterprise, ensuring a consistent (and less confusing) user experience.
• •Flows (Architecture): Visualize the entire user journey to identify where users are dropping off or getting frustrated.
• •Blueprints (Editor): Fine-tune the extracted code to match your enterprise coding standards.

📝 Note: Replay is built for regulated environments. Whether you are in Healthcare (HIPAA) or Finance (SOC2), Replay can be deployed on-premise to ensure that sensitive user data never leaves your network during the extraction process.

Frequently Asked Questions#

How does Replay handle complex business logic during extraction?#

Replay doesn't just record pixels; it records the state changes and network calls. When it generates a React component, it encapsulates that logic. If the legacy system requires a specific sequence of five API calls to "Save a Profile," Replay identifies that sequence and builds a modern wrapper around it, ensuring no logic is lost.

Can we use Replay if our legacy system is behind a VPN or On-Prem?#

Yes. Replay offers an on-premise version specifically for industries like Government and Manufacturing where data sovereignty is non-negotiable. The extraction happens within your secure perimeter.

How does this reduce the 18-month rewrite timeline?#

The majority of a rewrite's timeline is spent on "Discovery"—trying to figure out what the old system actually does. Replay automates Discovery. By cutting the documentation and reverse-engineering phase from months to days, you can move directly to implementation.

What is the average time savings for an enterprise project?#

On average, our enterprise partners see a 70% reduction in total project time. A project that was slated for 18 months can typically be completed in under 6 months using Visual Reverse Engineering.

---

Ready to modernize without rewriting? Book a pilot with Replay - see your legacy screen extracted live during the call.